Profile Summary: cibarijus
Meet cibarijus, a blitz warrior and rapid tactician with a flair for both speed and endurance on the chessboard. Starting around 1900 in 2019, cibarijus has blitzed their way up to a peak rating near 2500 and keeps defying the odds with a knack for some truly impressive comebacks—winning nearly 90% of games after losing a piece! Yes, setbacks are mere speed bumps here.
With over 10,000 blitz wins and an average of more than 70 moves per victory, this player is no stranger to epic battles and deep strategic fights. Those who underestimate cibarijus early might find themselves on the losing side, as the “Early Resignation Rate” is a tiny 1.17%, meaning they stick around to scramble until the bitter end.
Whether playing White with a 54% win rate or Black with just over 51%, cibarijus shows a balanced game and solid psychological resilience—even though sometimes the tilt factor tries to sneak in (hey, who can be perfect?). Fun fact: their longest winning streak was an astounding 22 games in a row. Imagine the momentum!
Known to keep opponents guessing — from the most frequent foes like aflatunmamedov to the latest challengers like de1wolfe — cibarijus has a mix of ruthless determination and respect for the game that makes every match a potential thriller.
Timing? Oh yes, they win more than 60% of games played between 21:00 and 23:00 — perhaps a sign that cibarijus is a night owl or thrives under moonlight pressure!
In summary, cibarijus is a chess gladiator with a sharp mind, a stubborn heart, and the skill to back it all up. A player who not only plays the pieces but also plays the clock, the psychology, and yes, occasionally your nerves.
What you’re doing well in blitz
You demonstrate strong tactical awareness and a willingness to press when you sense activity against the opponent’s king. In your recent win, you coordinated your pieces to build a penalties-based attack on the king side and convert pressure into a decisive finish. You also show perseverance in dynamic middlegames, keeping lines open and using active rooks and central pawns to create practical winning chances.
- Piece activity and initiative: you often activate rooks and placed pieces on active squares, which helps you create threats quickly in fast time controls.
- Tactical calculation under time pressure: you spot combinations and forcing moves that create concrete winning chances even when the position is complex.
- Resilience in dynamic positions: you don’t rush to simplify when you have dynamic chances, preserving chances to outplay your opponent in the middlegame.
Areas to improve
- Keep king safety and back-rank awareness in blitz: in the recent attacking sequence, precise calculation is crucial to avoid blunders or giving the opponent counterplay. Build a habit of checking king safety after each forcing line, especially when pieces flood into the attack.
- Time management and pacing: several moves show you operating near time pressure. Practice a simple time-management plan (e.g., allocate a fixed block to the opening, then a dedicated middlegame segment) to avoid rushed decisions on critical moves.
- Endgame/conversion discipline: when you force trades, ensure you have a concrete plan to convert. If the position becomes complex, simplify methodically and verify key endgame ideas (pawn structure, king activity, and outside passed pawns) before the time runs low.
Key moments from your recent games
- Win highlight: you built pressure through piece activity and central pawn advances, culminating in a mating net against the opponent’s king. Next time, try to keep the attack compact and verify every forcing line to minimize counterplay for your opponent.
- Loss highlight: in the recent defeat, there were moments where king safety and piece coordination could have been tightened. Focus on choosing forcing lines that preserve king shelter and avoid overextension when the opponent’s counterplay becomes dangerous.
- Draws highlight: your play in slightly imbalanced positions shows you can maintain pressure and keep dynamic chances. Strengthen your ability to choose one clear plan in mixed positions to avoid getting bogged down in multiple simultaneous ideas.
Opening choices and plan
Your opening data indicates solid results in several dynamic, attacking setups. Consider focusing on two to three openings that align with your strengths and give you practical chances in blitz. Notable trends from your openings performance include:
- King’s Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation – strong win rate around 60%. Good for sharp, lines where you can press early in the middlegame.
- Dörny (Dory) Defense – solid results with a flexible structure that players often convert pressure into material gains in blitz.
- Sicilian lines like the Alapin Variation and related asymmetrical structures – offer practical non-mainline options with good winning chances.
Recommended approach: pick 1–2 openings you enjoy and study them in depth (typical move orders, common middlegame plans, and typical traps). This will help you avoid hedge lines and make faster, confident decisions in blitz.
Recent win in a sharp Sicilian-type line:
Actionable plan for the next 2 weeks
- Time management drill: in each blitz game, set a personal target to spend no more than a third of the time on the first 12 moves; practice with a timer to build consistent pacing.
- Two openings to specialize: commit to 1–2 lines from the strong-performing openings (e.g., King’s Indian lines and a Dory/Grunfeld-like structure). Create a short study sheet with key ideas, typical piece placements, and typical endgames from those branches.
- Tactics and pattern practice: include 15–20 quick tactical puzzles per week focused on typical blitz motifs (back rank patterns, rook activity, and attacking chances against exposed kings).
- Endgame basics: practice converting small material advantages in knight and pawn endgames, focusing on pushing passed pawns and activating the king in the endgame.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| captain_buggy | 5W / 3L / 0D | |
| doubting-castle | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| juliusgladiator | 2W / 0L / 1D | |
| astrofan08 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| ellipally | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| garryzet | 1W / 4L / 0D | |
| onlyshallow | 3W / 11L / 0D | |
| vladom2019 | 9W / 2L / 2D | |
| shyamkumar2003 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| whoisgosset | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| aflatunmamedov | 37W / 47L / 7D | |
| RaphaelGilles | 30W / 32L / 6D | |
| Tom Borvander | 38W / 24L / 5D | |
| Trainingbg81 | 26W / 28L / 11D | |
| Dario Alivodic | 25W / 25L / 8D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2343 | 2331 | ||
| 2024 | 2401 | 2333 | ||
| 2023 | 2242 | 2419 | ||
| 2022 | 1891 | 2235 | 2435 | |
| 2021 | 2374 | 2313 | ||
| 2020 | 2276 | 2325 | ||
| 2019 | 2283 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 863W / 744L / 148D | 802W / 787L / 143D | 72.2 |
| 2024 | 943W / 796L / 167D | 886W / 874L / 143D | 74.1 |
| 2023 | 726W / 544L / 113D | 676W / 588L / 123D | 73.9 |
| 2022 | 1030W / 630L / 154D | 973W / 700L / 175D | 74.4 |
| 2021 | 1127W / 664L / 165D | 1061W / 716L / 151D | 75.2 |
| 2020 | 1031W / 661L / 161D | 965W / 710L / 178D | 75.0 |
| 2019 | 266W / 138L / 39D | 259W / 145L / 41D | 74.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 808 | 433 | 300 | 75 | 53.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 800 | 421 | 303 | 76 | 52.6% |
| Döry Defense | 770 | 418 | 303 | 49 | 54.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 693 | 412 | 233 | 48 | 59.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 676 | 334 | 269 | 73 | 49.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 638 | 353 | 225 | 60 | 55.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 580 | 305 | 231 | 44 | 52.6% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 566 | 265 | 247 | 54 | 46.8% |
| Benko Gambit | 528 | 283 | 195 | 50 | 53.6% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bg5 c6 | 507 | 272 | 180 | 55 | 53.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Döry Defense | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 16.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 2 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |