Overview
Sasa Micic (username: Cicmis) is a fast-talking, faster-moving blitz specialist who prefers the thrill of the clock over the comforts of long thinking sessions. A prolific online player since the mid‑2010s, Sasa built a reputation for sharp Sicilian battlegrounds, cheeky gambits and a knack for late comebacks that make spectators spill their coffee.
- Primary alias: Cicmis
- Preferred time control: Blitz chess — a true speed enthusiast
- Career highlight (peak blitz):
- Trend snapshot:
Playing style & strengths
Sasa plays like someone who treats each 3+0 game as a micro-opera: dramatic, tactical, and often resolved before the final aria. Key traits:
- Blitz specialist — excellent time management and practical decision making under pressure.
- Tactical awareness with a high comeback rate; not afraid to grind after a material slip.
- Endgame durability — long average game lengths show Sasa enjoys battles that last.
Fun statistic: Sasa's best hours for wins skew late at night — an insomniac's secret weapon.
Favorite openings & signature lines
Openings read like a love letter to the Sicilian. If you want to bother Sasa, invite them into Najdorf territory and expect fireworks.
- Top repertoire: Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation — many games, many decisive results.
- Also fond of: Blackburne Shilling Gambit and Scheveningen ideas.
- Successes across time controls, but particularly strong in blitz sharp lines.
Example clip — a typical Sicilian skirmish (click to replay in the viewer):
Notable opponents & streaks
Sasa has battled many regular rivals in the online arena. A few frequent names:
- musd9 — solid match history and memorable tactical scraps (musd9).
- cheezemaster45 — another recurring foe (cheezemaster45).
- Other frequently met opponents include 12dola and bediajr.
Streaks: Sasa's longest winning run reached 21 games — a streak long enough to make the calendar jealous. When things go south the tilt factor can rise, but comebacks are common.
Quirks, fun facts & how to spot Cicmis online
If you face Sasa, expect:
- Fast clock moves and a tendency to steer games into sharp, tactical waters.
- A healthy respect for gambits — both giving and receiving.
- Occasional early resignations (a merciful civility), followed by immediate rematches.
SEO-friendly quick facts for search engines and curious fans: Sasa Micic, aka Cicmis — blitz specialist, Sicilian advocate, comeback artist, peak blitz rating and notable peak in bullet .
Want a rematch? Keep a sharp eye on late‑night lobbies — that’s where Cicmis does their best work.
Quick overview
Nice conversion vs jayvietampalasan — you handled the transition to an ending well and pushed your passed pawn confidently. In the loss vs darklordwauron you got outplayed in a pawn‑race and allowed a promotion. Overall your blitz shows good practical sense but some recurring issues in time‑pressure, pawn races and coordination.
What you did well (keep doing these)
- Active king play in the endgame — you brought the king forward at the right moments (win vs jayvietampalasan).
- Creating and advancing a passed pawn — you turn small advantages into concrete winning plans instead of chasing every tactic.
- Exchanging into favorable endgames — when rooks and pawns remained you converted methodically.
- Good use of rooks on open files and seventh rank pressure — repeated in recent wins.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- Pawn‑race awareness: in the loss you underestimated opponent’s pawn majority and promotion threats. Before trading, count pawn moves to queen and ask “who queens first?”
- Time management in complex positions — you win with a lot of clock left, but in other games you let fast pawn pushes decide the game. Practice slower decision checkpoints: 30s left = simplify or create a single clear plan.
- Piece coordination vs passed pawns — sometimes pieces are active but not ideally placed to stop queening (look for defending squares for rooks/king).
- Tactical vigilance on back‑rank/queening motifs — check the opponent’s queening squares and possible sacrifices before pushing pawns.
Concrete drills and habits (daily/weekly)
- Daily 10–15 tactics (focus on pawn promotions, queening traps, and rook tactics).
- Three 15–20 minute endgame sessions per week: rook+pawn vs rook, pawn race scenarios, basic queenless king+rook endgames.
- One slow game per week (15|10 or longer) where you force yourself to use a 30s+ decision rule at critical positions — improves clock discipline.
- After every loss, do a 5–10 minute post‑mortem: find the single turning move and write one sentence rule to avoid it next time (e.g., “don’t allow e‑pawn to advance unopposed”).
Opening checklist (practical blitz fixes)
Your win came from a Petrov structure. Keep these blitz opening habits:
- Stick to 3–4 reliable sidelines you know well — reduce “think time” in the first 10 moves.
- If the opponent deviates, aim to simplify into structures you can play (exchanges that lead to clear plans).
- Study a few model endgames that arise from Petrov's so you recognize the right simplifications quickly.
Mini training plan — next 2 weeks
- Week 1: Tactics (10/day) + 3 endgame drills (rook endings + pawn races). Play 10 blitz games focusing on time checkpoints.
- Week 2: Add 2 longer games (15|10) and one session reviewing the last 10 losses with the 5–10 minute post‑mortem rule.
- Goal: fewer panic moves in the final 5 minutes and better evaluation of pawn race outcomes.
Practical tips to apply immediately
- Before any pawn push that opens the board, do a quick “who queens first?” calculation — 3 ply is often enough in blitz.
- If you have a material edge but little time, simplify to an ending you know (king+rook vs king+rook is easier than a chaotic queen ending).
- When your opponent plays fast and aggressively, don’t mirror speed — force them to prove the attack or trade into a technical endgame.
Examples / review links
Replay your last win to see the transition from middlegame to winning endgame:
Openings to review: Petrov's and basic pawn‑race motifs against knights/rooks.
If you want, I can...
- Annotate 1–2 of your losses (5–10 minute focused analysis) and give exact blunder moments.
- Create a personalized 2‑week tactics + endgame plan based on which mistakes you want to stop repeating.
Tell me which option you'd like and I’ll prepare the next steps. Also happy to review a specific game from your archive — drop the link or opponent name.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kaspirateur74 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| firasbk | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| itimiii | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ericsadriddin | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chapatz007 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| jjulasri | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| invsun | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| yura081991 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| colombia10 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| spartan125 | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12dola | 5W / 13L / 1D | View Games |
| Bedia Dungon | 8W / 10L / 1D | View Games |
| iliriku_pellazgjik | 6W / 11L / 1D | View Games |
| musd9 | 10W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
| chesscoot | 9W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1835 | 2145 | 1493 | |
| 2024 | 1819 | 2007 | 1502 | |
| 2023 | 1818 | 1948 | 1571 | |
| 2022 | 1728 | 1972 | 1599 | |
| 2021 | 1752 | 1967 | 1590 | |
| 2020 | 1736 | 1971 | 1663 | |
| 2019 | 1926 | |||
| 2018 | 1986 | |||
| 2017 | 1849 | |||
| 2016 | 1444 | 1867 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 888W / 798L / 123D | 920W / 777L / 118D | 79.8 |
| 2024 | 700W / 539L / 82D | 641W / 619L / 65D | 75.0 |
| 2023 | 637W / 577L / 82D | 600W / 644L / 70D | 74.4 |
| 2022 | 587W / 449L / 66D | 525W / 518L / 59D | 72.7 |
| 2021 | 968W / 842L / 135D | 887W / 880L / 136D | 77.8 |
| 2020 | 901W / 840L / 188D | 821W / 926L / 189D | 76.2 |
| 2019 | 468W / 397L / 45D | 435W / 426L / 45D | 79.7 |
| 2018 | 616W / 510L / 68D | 577W / 553L / 52D | 77.3 |
| 2017 | 581W / 513L / 48D | 556W / 518L / 61D | 75.9 |
| 2016 | 129W / 94L / 18D | 121W / 109L / 17D | 78.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 482 | 234 | 229 | 19 | 48.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 480 | 265 | 200 | 15 | 55.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 258 | 121 | 116 | 21 | 46.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 237 | 104 | 120 | 13 | 43.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 183 | 80 | 96 | 7 | 43.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 178 | 94 | 78 | 6 | 52.8% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 163 | 81 | 74 | 8 | 49.7% |
| Czech Defense | 144 | 68 | 64 | 12 | 47.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 138 | 59 | 75 | 4 | 42.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 136 | 84 | 45 | 7 | 61.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1018 | 529 | 425 | 64 | 52.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1000 | 536 | 404 | 60 | 53.6% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 498 | 259 | 204 | 35 | 52.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 488 | 230 | 227 | 31 | 47.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 410 | 204 | 191 | 15 | 49.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 389 | 188 | 182 | 19 | 48.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 304 | 157 | 125 | 22 | 51.6% |
| Czech Defense | 286 | 143 | 117 | 26 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 276 | 151 | 116 | 9 | 54.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 266 | 144 | 110 | 12 | 54.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 388 | 145 | 195 | 48 | 37.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 372 | 211 | 127 | 34 | 56.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 239 | 139 | 81 | 19 | 58.2% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 162 | 80 | 60 | 22 | 49.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 152 | 76 | 62 | 14 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 139 | 114 | 20 | 5 | 82.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 130 | 54 | 60 | 16 | 41.5% |
| Unknown | 124 | 123 | 0 | 1 | 99.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 121 | 53 | 50 | 18 | 43.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 120 | 83 | 27 | 10 | 69.2% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 1 |