Overview
ComeHugMyKing is the online chess handle of Michael W. A naturally curious rapid player who treats the clock as a second opponent. He competes across Blitz, Rapid, and Bullet, with a fondness for sharp lines, daring gambits, and endgames that refuse to quit. For a quick profile peek, see ComeHugMyKing.
Career Highlights
- Preferred time control: Rapid (top-drawer rapid battles, lots of late-night battles and clutch finishes).
- Peak rapid rating: 1615 (Rapid) as of 2024-05-04, with other peak marks in Blitz and Bullet around the 1615–1658 range over different periods. 1615 (2024-05-04)
- Longstanding streaks: Longest winning streak 19 games; current winning streak 5. Longest losing streak 68 with a resilient climb back after rough stretches.
- Openings a constant theatre: blitz openings show a love for the Sicilian Defense (2642 games, ~48.3% win rate) and Amar Gambit (1455 games, ~44%), with other favorites like Blackburne Shilling Gambit and Scandi contributing to a dynamic repertoire.
Openings and Style
His Blitz repertoire leans toward aggressive, tactical skirmishes, with the Sicilian Defense and the Amar Gambit often steering the action. In Rapid and Bullet, he explores a wide mix—from solid C00/A00 workloads to sharp A45/B20 lines—showing versatility and a willingness to gamble when the position invites it. Notable trends across time controls include a penchant for fast, dynamic play and a readiness to switch gears as the clock ticks down. Highlights across formats include:
- Blitz: Sicilian Defense (2642 Games, Wins 1276, Losses 1208, Draws 158, WinRate 48.3); Amar Gambit (1455 Games, Wins 640, Losses 739, Draws 76, WinRate 43.99); Blackburne Shilling Gambit (1307 Games, Wins 616, Losses 624, Draws 67, WinRate 47.13).
- Daily: Nimzo-Indian Rubinstein System; Scandinavian Defense; English Drill Variation among others, reflecting a flexible, study-heavy approach.
- Rapid: Sicilian Defense; Amar Gambit; Philidor Defense; Scandinavian and other lines appear with strong continued use, showing adaptability under time pressure.
- Bullet: a battleground where aggressive choices like Amar Gambit and several sharp responses keep the pace frantic and instructive.
Records and Character
Streaks and endurance are a theme in ComeHugMyKing's journey: the longest winning streak reached 19 games, while the longest losing streak stretched to 68 games before turning around. The player has demonstrated a willingness to endure rough patches and come back with renewed tactical energy. The profile also shows a broad, data-driven engagement across multiple openings and time controls, underscoring a scholar-warrior mindset that enjoys both calculation drills and practical, push-the-bishop-into-action play.
Notes and Personality
Humor often accompanies the grind: when the clock runs low and a tactic misfires, ComeHugMyKing tends to smile, adjust, and forge onward to the next interesting tactical puzzle. In conversation and play, there’s a lighthearted stubbornness that keeps the learning curve steep and the games entertaining.
Data Snapshots
Live-insight snapshots and historical trends are available through dynamic charts and stats:
1615 (2024-05-04)
What went well in your recent rapid games
You showed good initiative and willingness to take tactical chances when the position allowed. In your win, you kept the opponent under pressure with active piece play and decisive rook and queen coordination that culminated in a practical finish. You also demonstrated the ability to castling safely and to generate multiple forcing threats when the game opened up.
- Active piece activity and willingness to sacrifice or trade into favorable lines when you detect a concrete plan.
- Consistent castling and king safety in the early to middlegame, which helped you execute your attacking ideas.
- Recognition of tactical opportunities to win material or create decisive threats in several sequences.
Key areas to improve for your next sessions
- Endgame technique: strengthen conversion of material or positional advantages into a win, especially in murkier middlegame-to-endgame transitions.
- Back-rank and defensive awareness: in some losses, there were sharp tactical blows aimed at the king’s position. Practice prophylaxis and identifying vulnerable back-rank patterns to avoid surprises.
- Time management: balance time spent on sharp tactical lines with a steady approach. Build a simple plan for the opening moves and stick to it to reserve time for accuracy in the middlegame.
- Calculation discipline: in complex lines, verify forcing moves and candidate responses before committing. This reduces careless blunders in fast time controls.
Openings: how to strengthen your repertoire
Your openings data shows solid results across several systems, with the Scandinavian Defense and certain Sicilian lines performing well. For rapid games, a compact, repeatable plan helps you avoid overreach in the first 15 moves. Consider focusing on a small, reliable set of lines and study typical middlegame plans that arise from them:
- Scandinavian Defense: continue refining the main branches you use. Build a clear middlegame plan based on quick development, central control, and pressure on light squares.
- Sicilian paths that align with your style: you’ve shown mixed results in broader Sicilian lines. Choose 1-2 specific Sicilian variations to master deeply (e.g., Dragon-leaning lines or a solid Scheveningen setup) and practice standard middlegame plans from those positions.
- Italian Game family: given the exposure in your recent games, pin down a straightforward plan for the Two Knights and Dragon variations, focusing on development, king safety, and clear tactical motifs you can rely on in counterplay.
If you want, I can tailor a simple 2-3 opening repertoire for White and Black based on how you typically respond to common responses, with a short set of standard middlegame plans for each.
Strength-adjusted performance and rating trends: what they mean for your plan
Your strength-adjusted win rate is around 0.499, which suggests there’s room to push your results a bit further with more consistency. Your rating-change data show periods of solid progress but also volatility. The takeaway is to couple sharp, tactical play with a steadier, principled approach in the opening and a checklist for the middlegame to reduce blunders.
- Focus on a dependable opening plan and a simple, repeatable middlegame idea for each line.
- Incorporate a quick “blunder check” before making a move in tense positions—a mental prompt to verify threats, captures, and checks.
- Use regular post-game reviews to identify recurring mistakes and track improvement on a weekly basis.
Two-week practice plan to target improvement
- Daily 15–20 minute tactic sessions focusing on common tactical motifs you’ve encountered (forks, pins, discovered attacks, back-rank ideas).
- Review 1 recent win and 1 recent loss in depth. Identify the first critical decision point and what you could have done differently.
- Practice 2-3 chosen openings with a simple middlegame plan. Use a timer to simulate rapid-game constraints and avoid overthinking the early moves.
- Endgame drills: rook endings and minor piece endings that frequently arise from the openings you play.
- Time-management drill: play quick 15–20 move mini-games from a position with equal material, focusing on making purposeful, efficient moves rather than chasing complications.
Next steps and how I can help
If you’d like, share the PGN of a recent game you found tricky and I’ll annotate it move-by-move, highlighting the decision points and suggesting concrete improvements. I can also generate a personalized two-week schedule built around your preferred openings and typical opponent profiles. You can think of this as a targeted coaching plan to translate your talent into more consistent wins in rapid play.
Profile aid: michaelw
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rbjrk | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| josephock27 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| arianmahrokh | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| soyelcesar | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| quantumlatke | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| dominuschessplayer | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| jaunty_boxer | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| simeone222 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| sighting01 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| emily_ginger | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1276 | |||
| 2024 | 1405 | 1401 | 949 | |
| 2023 | 1604 | 1278 | 1588 | |
| 2022 | 1504 | 1431 | 1521 | 906 |
| 2021 | 1232 | 1092 | 1244 | |
| 2020 | 1100 | 1369 | ||
| 2019 | 653 | 1047 | 1026 | 971 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 241W / 287L / 20D | 250W / 271L / 30D | 66.1 |
| 2024 | 596W / 675L / 61D | 624W / 631L / 81D | 64.0 |
| 2023 | 2060W / 2131L / 251D | 2041W / 2109L / 287D | 71.5 |
| 2022 | 2564W / 2642L / 341D | 2615W / 2591L / 341D | 73.8 |
| 2021 | 1122W / 1017L / 94D | 1068W / 1043L / 116D | 68.8 |
| 2020 | 108W / 89L / 11D | 102W / 96L / 8D | 63.4 |
| 2019 | 455W / 434L / 18D | 384W / 488L / 27D | 59.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 2654 | 1280 | 1215 | 159 | 48.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 1459 | 641 | 742 | 76 | 43.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1318 | 622 | 629 | 67 | 47.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 754 | 352 | 362 | 40 | 46.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 644 | 284 | 328 | 32 | 44.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 632 | 306 | 285 | 41 | 48.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 601 | 263 | 309 | 29 | 43.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 573 | 256 | 287 | 30 | 44.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 527 | 246 | 250 | 31 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 525 | 242 | 245 | 38 | 46.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 719 | 365 | 319 | 35 | 50.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 389 | 182 | 184 | 23 | 46.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 196 | 100 | 82 | 14 | 51.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 175 | 79 | 84 | 12 | 45.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 156 | 79 | 70 | 7 | 50.6% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 155 | 70 | 76 | 9 | 45.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 150 | 87 | 55 | 8 | 58.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 133 | 62 | 62 | 9 | 46.6% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 112 | 55 | 51 | 6 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Accelerated Dragon | 106 | 53 | 40 | 13 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2916 | 1416 | 1337 | 163 | 48.6% |
| French Defense | 904 | 428 | 419 | 57 | 47.4% |
| Australian Defense | 692 | 314 | 338 | 40 | 45.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 553 | 259 | 263 | 31 | 46.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 298 | 139 | 146 | 13 | 46.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 167 | 67 | 87 | 13 | 40.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 124 | 48 | 71 | 5 | 38.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 109 | 63 | 41 | 5 | 57.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 109 | 49 | 56 | 4 | 45.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 107 | 43 | 58 | 6 | 40.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 68 | 2 |