Jan Kokoszczynski - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Jan Kokoszczynski, also known in some circles as crazy_but_lazy, is a chess aficionado who has earned the distinguished title of FIDE Master. Blessed with an uncanny tactical awareness, Jan's comeback rate is an astonishing 92.59%, proving that giving up is simply not in their vocabulary. In fact, Jan boasts a nearly 99% win rate after losing a piece – talk about turning lemons into lemon bites!
Since bursting onto the rated blitz scene in 2019 with a rating of 2429, Jan has steadily climbed, reaching an impressive blitz peak of 2778 in 2024. Bullet chess fans have also witnessed Jan’s prowess, with ratings soaring past 2700 on several occasions. Rapid might be less frequented, but Jan still shows dominance with a solid 60% win rate in limited encounters. A true speed demon with a penchant for lightning-fast decisions!
One of Jan’s quirks is a remarkably low early resignation rate of just 1.23%. They prefer to fight tooth and nail, often dragging games deep into complex endgames — no shocker, given their vast experience, with over 8000 blitz and bullet games logged. The average moves per win hover around 86, suggesting Jan doesn't just blitz through games but enjoys a good, long battle on the 64 squares.
Jan’s psychological resilience is noteworthy. Despite a tilt factor of 13 (because even the best can't help but have a bad day), Jan’s rated-versus-casual win difference indicates a playful spirit who doesn’t always take things too seriously off the clock. Preparing for a match against Jan? Expect fierce competition but perhaps a few good-natured blunders – because where's the fun if you don't shake things up now and then?
With a longest winning streak of 22 games, Jan has certainly had their moments of absolute dominance. Their favorite openings remain top secret (naturally), adding an air of mystery and unpredictability to their style that keeps opponents guessing.
Whether it’s blitz, bullet, or rapid, Jan Kokoszczynski exemplifies the spirit of chess: strategic, relentless, and sprinkled with a dash of eccentric brilliance. A true master whose games are worth watching — just be prepared for a rollercoaster ride on the chessboard.
Hi Jan!
Great work reaching 2778 (2024-08-11) and keeping a solid win-rate (
). Below is some focused, constructive feedback based on your latest games.What you already do well
- Opening repertoire is flexible. You play both 1.e4 and 1.d4 comfortably and handle typical set-ups such as the Italian, Caro-Kann and Kings Indian. In the win against Yerkin Kozganbay you steered the game into a pleasant Italian middlegame and converted confidently.
- Tactical alertness. In several wins you spotted in-between moves (e.g. 24. Qf5+!! in the Yerkinio game) that changed the evaluation immediately.
- Piece activity in the middlegame. You often seize open files with rooks (…Rd8 vs. Chessontrack, …Rc8/Rc6 vs. Kytan), showing good understanding of coordinating heavy pieces.
Primary improvement themes
-
Time-management & conversion technique
Five of your last seven losses were on time in technically winning or drawable positions. Try:- Adopting a critical-moment routine: when you feel the position stabilise, spend one extra second deciding whether the position requires deep calculation or simple improving moves.
- Practising increment drills: play 1 | 1 games focusing only on finishing with 10–15 seconds to spare.
-
King safety when pushing pawns on one wing
In your loss to ნაზი თებიძე and ixcii, advancing g/h-pawns without a concrete follow-up weakened squares (g4/h4) that your opponent exploited. Before pushing wing pawns ask:“Can my opponent occupy the square I just weakened with tempo?”
If yes, consider strengthening first (e.g. 0-0-0 before g-pawn storms in KID structures). -
Endgame simplification choices
A few time-losses started earlier: trading into slightly worse endings under time pressure (e.g. queen exchange vs. JSlaby on move 23). Insert the question “Who benefits from this trade?” before exchanging queens or rooks, especially when structural weaknesses remain. -
Handling opposite-side castling races
In two recent defeats you castled long and began a pawn storm, yet didn’t open lines quickly enough. Remember:- Open files before launching pawn storms (sacrifice if needed).
- Central pawn breaks often trump flank pawn pushes; look for …e5/e4 or …d5/d4 first.
Action plan for the next 2 weeks
- Daily 10-minute tactics sprint (aim ≥70 % accuracy). Use motifs you missed recently: knight forks on e6/f7, queen deflections.
- Play five 5 | 5 games focusing exclusively on clock discipline. Annotate where you dropped below 30 s.
- Review two master games in the Italian C55 and King’s Indian Fianchetto. Notice how they time pawn breaks.
- End every session with one rook-and-pawn endgame drill (e.g. Lucena or Philidor). Your loss vs. LivetoFight shows this will convert directly into rating points.
Illustrative win to emulate
Keep up the hard work and enjoy the process. You’re very close to the next milestone—tightening these few areas will get you there. Good luck!
— Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Ivan Aldokhin | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| BSWPaulsen | 2W / 4L / 3D | |
| bursabbsatranc | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Dolgan Nyudleev | 0W / 4L / 0D | |
| chess_286 | 2W / 2L / 1D | |
| Clément Candelot | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Daniel Girsh | 7W / 5L / 0D | |
| Lovro Novosel | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Bobur Sattarov | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| rustevs | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Iwo Godzwon | 65W / 86L / 17D | |
| Patryk Chylewski | 74W / 51L / 17D | |
| bait_or_mate | 36W / 39L / 13D | |
| initiativeoverdose | 33W / 16L / 8D | |
| Swaggy_I | 32W / 12L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2623 | 2773 | 1600 | |
| 2024 | 2646 | 2580 | ||
| 2023 | 2596 | 2581 | ||
| 2022 | 2554 | 2517 | 2015 | |
| 2021 | 2606 | 2489 | 2300 | |
| 2020 | 2525 | 2491 | ||
| 2019 | 2349 | 2429 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 128W / 104L / 20D | 118W / 120L / 15D | 88.8 |
| 2024 | 519W / 467L / 101D | 485W / 496L / 97D | 90.3 |
| 2023 | 365W / 353L / 71D | 382W / 367L / 56D | 90.3 |
| 2022 | 227W / 216L / 44D | 218W / 239L / 40D | 88.8 |
| 2021 | 373W / 312L / 75D | 336W / 357L / 58D | 88.5 |
| 2020 | 364W / 297L / 59D | 331W / 330L / 55D | 83.3 |
| 2019 | 287W / 183L / 27D | 269W / 209L / 22D | 81.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 271 | 122 | 120 | 29 | 45.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 146 | 67 | 67 | 12 | 45.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 124 | 53 | 58 | 13 | 42.7% |
| Modern | 116 | 53 | 50 | 13 | 45.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 110 | 49 | 50 | 11 | 44.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 109 | 50 | 52 | 7 | 45.9% |
| Döry Defense | 104 | 46 | 52 | 6 | 44.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 93 | 47 | 40 | 6 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 88 | 36 | 45 | 7 | 40.9% |
| Australian Defense | 81 | 36 | 40 | 5 | 44.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 147 | 72 | 70 | 5 | 49.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 140 | 63 | 69 | 8 | 45.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 133 | 65 | 62 | 6 | 48.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 105 | 57 | 40 | 8 | 54.3% |
| Döry Defense | 90 | 35 | 51 | 4 | 38.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 89 | 45 | 38 | 6 | 50.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 85 | 43 | 35 | 7 | 50.6% |
| Modern | 83 | 48 | 33 | 2 | 57.8% |
| Unknown | 77 | 49 | 26 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Australian Defense | 74 | 40 | 29 | 5 | 54.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Yugoslav Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Scheveningen Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 2 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |