Csovi_csovi_Jasper: The Tenacious FIDE Master
Meet Csovi_csovi_Jasper, a FIDE Master whose chess journey is as relentless as their winning streaks! Jasper is not just any player; they’ve earned the esteemed FIDE Master title and have a knack for turning the impossible into possible with a staggering 86.55% comeback rate. If you lose a piece against them, don’t lose hope—Jasper’s win rate after losing material is a perfect 100%. Yes, you read that right. They could probably lose their queen and still walk away victorious.
Rating Ride
Over the years, Jasper's ratings have soared impressively. Their Blitz rating peaked at 2417 in 2022, while their Bullet rating smashed through to an exhilarating 2256. Even their Rapid and Daily ratings show a consistent climb, reflecting a player who thrives across all time controls. The only thing consistent in Jasper’s game is improvement and dominance.
Style & Strategy
Jasper prefers to engage in games that can last, boasting an average of nearly 70 moves per win and a typical loss stretching just over 73 moves. This is a player who enjoys the long haul and thrives in endgames, playing in them nearly 77% of their games. Early surrender is rare here—Jasper resigns only about 1% of the time, proving they’re in it to win it!
White or Black, Jasper holds an enviable edge, winning 59.28% of games as White and 56.46% as Black. If you’re playing against them, prepare for a battle of wits and stamina.
Records & Rivalries
Jasper's opening choice remains a Top Secret, but with a win rate over 91% in Daily games using it, this secret weapon clearly packs a punch. Their longest winning streak is a whopping 24 games, with a lively current streak of 5 wins—making them a fearsome foe on any given day.
Psychology & Personality
A tilt factor of 7 suggests Jasper handles pressure like a pro, though even the best have their moments! They tend to perform slightly better in rated games compared to casual ones, so expect their competitive spirit to ignite when the stakes are high.
Fun Fact
Contrary to what their intense focus might suggest, Csovi_csovi_Jasper’s username might remind you of a quirky chess superhero – always ready to swoop in and save the day with a brilliant combination or a last-minute dodge. Opponents beware: this master blends dogged determination with tactical wizardry!
Overview of your recent blitz games
You have shown willingness to play dynamic, tactical lines and to press in sharp positions. At the same time, blitz often exposes time pressure and positional oversights, especially in the middlegame and endgame. The key ideas below aim to help you convert more of your sharp reasoning into consistent results and to manage time more reliably.
What went well in your recent win
- You kept the game dynamic and created active chances for your pieces, which put pressure on your opponent to find precise replies.
- You maintained initiative and looked for opportunities to seize material or create threats, rather than passively defending.
- Your willingness to pursue concrete plans in the middlegame helped you steer toward favorable exchanges and a favorable endgame.
What to work on from the win
- Time management under pressure: in long blitz sequences, aim to identify 2–3 forcing ideas early so you don’t get stuck in lengthy calculations when the clock is ticking.
- Endgame simplification: if you are ahead on material or time, look for practical simplifications that reduce risk and keep your winning plan clear.
What to work on from your loss
- Endgame readiness: when the position becomes simplified, focus on keeping your king active and coordinating the remaining pieces efficiently. Avoid unnecessary exchanges that hand your opponent easy drawing chances or counterplay.
- Defensive pattern recognition: in tight or imbalanced positions, identify practical defensive resources (pawn structure changes, keeping pieces on active squares, and avoiding overly ambitious lines that invite counterplay).
- Time-aware decision making: in blitz, allocate a small, fixed amount of time for critical phases (opening, middlegame transitions, and endgame) to prevent time scramble from eroding your accuracy.
What to improve in openings (based on your performance)
- Balance aggression with structure: your Amar Gambit and O’Kelly-type lines show you like dynamic play, which can win when your opponent missteps. Pair that with a solid fallback plan for when the tactical fireworks don’t land, so you’re not left guessing in the early middlegame.
- Develop a compact repertoire: choose 1–2 main continuations for common move orders and study typical middlegame plans from those lines. This reduces decision fatigue and helps you keep time margins intact.
- Practice a quick, safe development sequence in the opening that gets your pieces out and king safely castled within the first 15 moves, so you have a clear, practical path even if your opponent diverges.
Practical next steps and a simple training plan
- Time management drill: play a block of short blitz games (e.g., 3+2) and set a personal cap to spend no more than a fixed amount in the first 15 moves. Review only the most critical moments where you exceeded your limit.
- Endgames in 15 minutes: study two common endgames (rook endings with pawns, and knight vs bishop minor-endgames) and practice 2–3 related practice puzzles per week.
- Opening refinement: pick two favorite openings (for example, your preferred Sicilian line and Amar Gambit) and build a crisp, practical plan for the typical middlegame structures that arise from them.
- Post-game review habit: after each game, write down 3 concrete alternative moves you could have played at crucial junctures and compare with a strong line later in the day.
Helpful extra notes
If you’d like, you can share a link to your profile for tailored, private follow-up feedback. Placeholder: Csovi_csovi_Jasper
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| kimianswer | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Marian Petrov | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Michel000 | 5W / 0L / 0D | |
| novebg | 0W / 3L / 1D | |
| Tom Friedel | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| drrd23 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| karn-evil-9 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| wolfihofm | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| cvrckvrc | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| raptorage | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| thereber-vi | 27W / 2L / 2D | |
| sant_chess | 17W / 6L / 3D | |
| Jordan Brewer | 11W / 11L / 3D | |
| 64sqnowheretohide | 12W / 6L / 0D | |
| batuhanyelekcii | 7W / 4L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2307 | 1790 | 2303 | 1861 |
| 2024 | 2254 | 2236 | 2304 | 1668 |
| 2023 | 2004 | 2272 | 2293 | 1077 |
| 2022 | 2027 | 2181 | 2242 | 1604 |
| 2021 | 1997 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 339W / 151L / 18D | 333W / 150L / 31D | 69.2 |
| 2024 | 503W / 299L / 49D | 475W / 313L / 57D | 72.8 |
| 2023 | 335W / 233L / 42D | 323W / 273L / 29D | 74.3 |
| 2022 | 390W / 224L / 53D | 371W / 236L / 56D | 73.2 |
| 2021 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 3W / 0L / 0D | 70.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 425 | 238 | 156 | 31 | 56.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 141 | 107 | 29 | 5 | 75.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 122 | 72 | 44 | 6 | 59.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 121 | 61 | 49 | 11 | 50.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 120 | 72 | 39 | 9 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 102 | 48 | 46 | 8 | 47.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 96 | 50 | 38 | 8 | 52.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 88 | 49 | 31 | 8 | 55.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 84 | 52 | 27 | 5 | 61.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 80 | 45 | 32 | 3 | 56.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 116 | 65 | 47 | 4 | 56.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 54 | 35 | 16 | 3 | 64.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 51 | 29 | 19 | 3 | 56.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 50 | 29 | 20 | 1 | 58.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 45 | 20 | 24 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 45 | 19 | 25 | 1 | 42.2% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 42 | 18 | 23 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Czech Defense | 29 | 18 | 10 | 1 | 62.1% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 28 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 27 | 17 | 8 | 2 | 63.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 17 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 76.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 69 | 39 | 21 | 9 | 56.5% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 25 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 68.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 60.0% |
| Döry Defense | 13 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 11 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 40.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 1 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |