Dan A. - FIDE Master and Chess Enthusiast
Known on the boards as DanielArias1234, Dan A. is a proud FIDE Master who has been steadily conquering the chess world with a mixture of tactical brilliance and sheer stubbornness. Starting around 2012 with a modest blitz rating of 1371, Dan has sprinted up the rankings, peaking at an impressive 2461 in blitz by 2025. Not bad for someone who could still lose to their own knight if not careful!
Playing Style & Strengths
Dan is a master of patience and perseverance, with an endgame frequency of over 87%, proving that they’re in no rush to give up their queens without a proper fight. The average game length of nearly 78 moves for wins shows just how much they enjoy squeezing every drop of advantage out of their positions. Also, their tactical awareness is remarkable — boasting a stunning 100% win rate even after losing a piece. Opponents beware!
Speed Demon on the Clock
In blitz and bullet chess, Dan is like a whirlwind. Their bullet rating touching 2566 in 2025 is nothing short of incredible. They’ve played thousands of bullet games, winning over 2,600 and proving that their mouse hand is as quick as their mind. Despite the speed, there’s still method and mystery in their moves — their most frequent opening is simply labeled "Unknown Opening," which keeps opponents guessing fiercely.
Psychological Grit
Dan's resilience is legendary. With a comeback rate over 93%, and a tilt factor carefully controlled at 9 out of 100, they don't just win—they mentally outlast. Even when opponents think they've got a clear advantage, Dan’s fighting spirit kicks in. Games lost due to blundering pieces are practically non-existent, showing a calm and collected mindset under pressure.
Favourite Rivalries & Quirks
Dan has squared off against a sizable list of regular opponents, including the notorious mightymove and georgiev_biser, with whom the battles have been both intense and entertaining. Their winning streak record peaks at 13 games, which is a devastating run for anyone unlucky enough to face them on a good day.
A Fun Fact
Dan tends to do better in the wee hours, with one of their highest win rates coming at 9 AM sharp (80%) and midnight (62.56%), which might explain why they always look like they’ve had only a few hours of sleep but plenty of coffee. Early resignation is rare in their games—only 0.62%—because giving up is not in Dan’s vocabulary (unless it’s that one time they lost a queen to a sneaky pawn... shh).
In the world of chess, Dan A. is a fierce competitor and a chessboard philosopher who proves that skill, speed, and a sense of humor make a winning combination.
Positive Aspects of Your Recent Blitz Games
You are demonstrating several strong points in your blitz games that contribute to your success:
- Opening Preparation: Your games show consistent use of solid openings such as the Sicilian Defense in both the Najdorf and Closed variations. Your win rates above 57% in these openings indicate good preparation and understanding.
- Active Play and Initiative: In the sample games, you often take the initiative early, including early pawn pushes and aggressive piece placement, particularly the advance of your f-pawn and quick development of bishops and queens.
- Time Management: Despite the fast nature of blitz, you maintain good time balance, rarely falling into extreme time trouble until the late endgame, allowing you to execute your plans well.
- Consistent Progress: Your rating trend shows a steady and positive slope with roughly 25 points of progress per month, which reflects consistent improvement over time.
Areas to Focus on for Improvement
There are several areas where focused practice could help increase your potency in blitz further:
- Endgame Precision: Some games ended by opponent time forfeits rather than clear positional wins. Improving endgame technique and clarity would allow you to convert winning or advantageous positions more reliably without relying on opponent errors.
- Opening Diversity and Flexibility: Although your primary openings perform well, diversifying your opening repertoire could prepare you better against a wider range of opponents and reduce predictability.
- Defensive Resourcefulness: A few losses came in closely contested lines. Practice recognizing defensive resources better to extend fights and avoid sudden tactical losses.
- Calculation Under Time Pressure: Blitz demands rapid calculation; training tactics and visualization under short time controls can sharpen your intuition and reduce oversight mistakes.
- Transitioning to Middlegame Plans: Improving your understanding of key middlegame plans derived from your opening choices will help you sustain pressure and find stronger attacking ideas.
Next Steps and Training Suggestions
To build on your strengths and address improvement areas, consider incorporating these into your training:
- Practice complex endgames daily, focusing on common theoretical positions relevant to your openings.
- Study grandmaster games in your favorite openings, paying attention to middlegame plans and tactical motifs.
- Use tactical trainers with decreasing time per problem to mimic blitz conditions and improve calculation speed.
- Experiment with secondary openings to deepen your understanding of different pawn structures and strategies.
- Analyze your lost games to identify recurring patterns or critical errors, particularly in the middlegame transitions.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Carlos Alarcia | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| DrHerbst | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Martha Fierro | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| nitrofish07 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| israelmachine | 1W / 2L / 1D | |
| maxkho2 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| casteelchess | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| fronk98 | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| pacosh | 1W / 1L / 1D | |
| obscurus | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Henrik Dalsgaard | 49W / 33L / 3D | |
| georgiev_biser | 35W / 28L / 3D | |
| ugetting | 26W / 18L / 2D | |
| bata_bg | 31W / 8L / 4D | |
| roamingmoose | 21W / 20L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2493 | 2461 | ||
| 2023 | 2256 | 2423 | ||
| 2022 | 2297 | 2396 | ||
| 2021 | 2123 | 2362 | ||
| 2020 | 2248 | |||
| 2019 | 2216 | |||
| 2018 | 2237 | |||
| 2017 | 2169 | |||
| 2016 | 2153 | |||
| 2015 | 2023 | |||
| 2014 | 1996 | |||
| 2012 | 1646 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 870W / 643L / 92D | 839W / 693L / 79D | 84.4 |
| 2023 | 86W / 41L / 6D | 67W / 50L / 7D | 85.0 |
| 2022 | 677W / 346L / 61D | 639W / 381L / 70D | 82.7 |
| 2021 | 323W / 190L / 25D | 302W / 207L / 29D | 83.1 |
| 2020 | 172W / 74L / 19D | 156W / 97L / 20D | 84.6 |
| 2019 | 0W / 3L / 0D | 3W / 2L / 0D | 74.0 |
| 2018 | 45W / 26L / 1D | 34W / 35L / 4D | 80.4 |
| 2017 | 5W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 2L / 1D | 48.1 |
| 2016 | 4W / 1L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 0D | 76.3 |
| 2015 | 5W / 10L / 0D | 12W / 4L / 0D | 73.3 |
| 2014 | 25W / 18L / 0D | 26W / 16L / 0D | 78.5 |
| 2012 | 6W / 0L / 0D | 4W / 2L / 0D | 55.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 875 | 462 | 374 | 39 | 52.8% |
| Australian Defense | 756 | 407 | 309 | 40 | 53.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 464 | 297 | 136 | 31 | 64.0% |
| Döry Defense | 449 | 243 | 182 | 24 | 54.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 312 | 174 | 121 | 17 | 55.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 253 | 144 | 96 | 13 | 56.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 239 | 120 | 103 | 16 | 50.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 210 | 116 | 79 | 15 | 55.2% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 196 | 104 | 82 | 10 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 167 | 97 | 57 | 13 | 58.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 118 | 72 | 42 | 4 | 61.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 64 | 37 | 25 | 2 | 57.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 40 | 21 | 17 | 2 | 52.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 36 | 15 | 17 | 4 | 41.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 21 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Modern | 20 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 55.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 20 | 12 | 8 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 19 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 73.7% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 18 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Döry Defense | 17 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 52.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |