IM Dawid Czerw (DawidCzerw) — bullet specialist, tactician, and streamer
International Master Dawid Czerw is a fast-handed attacker and a crowd-pleasing chess streamer known for lethal Bullet chess instincts and a mischievous sense of humor. An official FIDE International Master, Dawid blends IM-caliber calculation with online swagger, turning scrappy time scrambles into artful Flagging and practical magic.
He’s most at home in bullet, where the clock is a weapon and style points count. Career highlight: Bullet peak with sustained top-level form across multiple seasons. When viewers say “flag or be flagged,” Dawid usually picks “flag.”
Style and openings
DawidCzerw’s repertoire is equal parts ambition and surprise. He happily invites chaos with the Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation, mixes poisons in the Sicilian Defense: Closed, and punches first with the feisty Australian Defense. In blitz and rapid he’s sharpened the Accelerated Dragon into a practical weapon and has no problem steering into a long grind if it promises a technical win.
- Signature setups: Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation, Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation, and the evergreen Australian Defense.
- Practical philosophy: punish LPDO (Loose pieces drop off), hunt initiative, and push “Harry” when it hurts.
- Endgame confidence: high endgame frequency with patient technique and a nose for Swindle opportunities.
Streaming and community
As a chess streamer, IM Dawid Czerw entertains with educational speedruns, opening experiments, and unapologetic time-scramble theater. Expect clear explanations, friendly banter, and the occasional “that’s a Cheap shot but I’ll take it.” Pro tip: the “morning coffee” sessions are deadly—his best form statistically shows up at dawn.
- Content vibe: instructive, practical, and occasionally chaotic—think “study plan meets adrenaline.”
- Fan-favorite moments: last-second saves, resourceful Swindles, and converting “equal-ish” into “checkmated.”
Rivals, records, and highlights
Dawid’s ledger is thick with online battles. He’s had a fierce rivalry with Marcin Molenda, a powerhouse head-to-head saga that sharpened his bullet instincts. Against joelclementine he’s been a certified giant-killer, and regulars like mmelek94 keep the training arc spicy.
- Most-played rivalry: Marcin Molenda — a marathon matchup featuring momentum swings and deep prep.
- Fan-friendly stat: longest win streak of 43 games during a flag-fest of form.
- Persona: “premove warrior” with clean technique when the dust settles.
Progress and momentum
Years of high-volume competition forged a consistent top-tier bullet profile. The journey from confident grinder to elite sprinter shows in the trendline below.
- Bullet growth snapshot:
- Known for practical chances, rapid evaluation, and fearless transitions from attack to endgame.
Miniature moment
A bite-sized nod to the “Bullet Checkmate” aesthetic—short, sweet, and merciless.
Fun facts
- Known to turn “equal” into “winning” with a timely rook lift and “Pigs on the 7th”.
- Will sac on principle if the initiative and the clock approve—call it an intuitive Speculative sacrifice.
- Self-described “tempo junkie” who believes good coordination beats pure materialism.
In short: IM Dawid Czerw is the rare blend of entertainer and executioner—part educator, part flag merchant, all-in competitor. Tune in, take notes, and watch the evaluation bar surf as Dawid turns pressure into points.
Hi Dawid!
You’ve been playing energetic, ambitious chess and it shows in your results. Let’s build on those strengths while tightening up a few recurring weak spots.
What you’re already doing well
- Initiative-first mindset. In many wins (e.g. against Md Omar Ak Hafizon Pg and IMab3020) you seized space with early pawn breaks (e4–e5, f-pawns forward) and never let go of the tempo.
- Tactical alertness. 24.Rxd7! – 27.Ra7! in the most recent win shows excellent calculation and confidence in material imbalances.
- Fast decision making. You often finish 60-second games with >10 s on the clock. That speed is a weapon once the underlying evaluation is solid.
Low-hanging fruit (1–2 weeks)
- King safety & prophylaxis.
• Loss vs. alex_7kxxx: 27…g5?! weakened dark squares, allowing Qd4–e3–h7 mate.
• Loss vs. ethanll09: 24…d5 created self-pins on the e-file and cost the game.
Rule of thumb: Before any pawn thrust, ask “What squares will become weak and can my opponent land a piece there in 2 moves?” Spend just one extra second on that question. - Conversion of extra material.
Games that reach winning rook endgames sometimes slip (see 37…Qg4# vs. ethanll09 from the opposite side). Drill basic rook endings (Lucena, Philidor) until conversion feels automatic. - Time-control variety.
Your intuition is strong, but complex endings need deeper thought. Mix in several 10|0 or 15|10 games each week for deliberate practice.
Strategic themes to study (next 2–3 months)
- Pawn majorities & passed-pawn races. Loss vs. Alex_7kxxx hinged on handling the a--pawn race. Study classic games where one side wins by queening a wing pawn.
- Benoni / Benko structures as Black. You often reach …c5, …g6 setups. Invest time in model games by Kasparov & Topalov to learn typical plans.
- Prophylactic thinking. Read a chapter of Dvoretsky’s “Positional Play” or Nikos Ntirlis’ “Playing with the Pieces” and practice spotting opposing threats before you attack.
Opening toolbox
Your flexible move-order (Reti, Saragossa, Larsen) is a strength, yet sometimes drifts into unclear territory. Suggested focuses:
| You are White | Key Idea |
|---|---|
| Saragossa 1.c3 | Meet …d5/…e5 by steering into reversed Caro-Kann plans (c4, d4 break). |
| Reti / g3 setups | Have a ready answer vs. early …c5; study Fischer–Petrosian (1962) for a blueprint. |
As Black, the …b6/…Bb7 Owen’s lines score well but watch the c--file pressure; keep a rook ready for c-counterplay.
Illustrative moment
From your loss to Alex_7kxxx:
You were up material but loosening moves (…g5, …e4) gave White access to dark squares. Instead, 28…Rc4! forces queens off and wins technically.
Training plan
- Daily: 15 minutes of tactics (4-5 puzzles at 2400+ rating) emphasizing defensive motifs such as intermediate checks and back-rank patterns.
- 3× / week: Play one 15|10 game. Annotate yourself first, then compare with engine.
- Weekly endgame session: Work through 5 positions from Silman’s “Complete Endgame Course” starting at your rating band.
Mindset reminder
“Play what the position demands, not what your last game suggests.” — Keep each move fresh.
Good luck pushing toward your next milestone of 2617 (2023-05-29)! Keep the energy, add a dash of restraint, and your win-rate curve will keep climbing.
See you over the board!
— Your Chess Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| jiliv | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dirtycheck | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| el-capa | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| tjcmhh | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Dani Raznikov | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| botal84 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Polarbear1224 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| anti-tactical | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Paul Szuper | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| hounddog2006 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marcin Molenda | 64W / 83L / 9D | View Games |
| mmelek94 | 47W / 26L / 7D | View Games |
| joelclementine | 74W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| Kacper Polok | 30W / 35L / 8D | View Games |
| aikitt | 21W / 33L / 8D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2500 | 2687 | 2480 | 1476 |
| 2024 | 2458 | 2461 | 2480 | |
| 2023 | 2380 | 2503 | 2480 | |
| 2022 | 2442 | 2497 | 2454 | 1688 |
| 2021 | 2444 | 2374 | 2279 | 1793 |
| 2020 | 2393 | 2446 | 2099 | 1803 |
| 2019 | 2234 | 2335 | 1696 | 1642 |
| 2018 | 2164 | 2010 | 1632 | 1873 |
| 2017 | 2160 | |||
| 2016 | 1880 | 2248 | 1200 | 1636 |
| 2015 | 1738 | 2042 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 177W / 120L / 31D | 169W / 115L / 25D | 76.3 |
| 2024 | 335W / 241L / 27D | 306W / 259L / 35D | 77.0 |
| 2023 | 514W / 330L / 60D | 487W / 362L / 64D | 79.4 |
| 2022 | 321W / 182L / 27D | 311W / 196L / 23D | 76.6 |
| 2021 | 1167W / 670L / 113D | 1102W / 773L / 112D | 75.3 |
| 2020 | 805W / 433L / 100D | 801W / 459L / 108D | 74.2 |
| 2019 | 776W / 351L / 51D | 681W / 416L / 73D | 71.5 |
| 2018 | 1414W / 917L / 138D | 1303W / 1009L / 151D | 71.8 |
| 2017 | 128W / 96L / 12D | 129W / 95L / 12D | 72.1 |
| 2016 | 150W / 104L / 15D | 146W / 107L / 20D | 69.7 |
| 2015 | 84W / 54L / 8D | 79W / 58L / 5D | 65.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 541 | 312 | 191 | 38 | 57.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 501 | 281 | 192 | 28 | 56.1% |
| Australian Defense | 373 | 235 | 125 | 13 | 63.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 350 | 241 | 95 | 14 | 68.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 298 | 171 | 93 | 34 | 57.4% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 297 | 178 | 105 | 14 | 59.9% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 296 | 161 | 117 | 18 | 54.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 286 | 164 | 102 | 20 | 57.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 270 | 143 | 101 | 26 | 53.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 269 | 160 | 92 | 17 | 59.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 44 | 34 | 6 | 4 | 77.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 36 | 30 | 6 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 30 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 28 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 60.7% |
| Dutch Defense | 27 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 74.1% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 25 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 70.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 24 | 16 | 5 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 23 | 15 | 5 | 3 | 65.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 19 | 7 | 11 | 1 | 36.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 397 | 202 | 178 | 17 | 50.9% |
| Australian Defense | 230 | 136 | 92 | 2 | 59.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 191 | 95 | 90 | 6 | 49.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 190 | 92 | 86 | 12 | 48.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 183 | 99 | 79 | 5 | 54.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 168 | 91 | 69 | 8 | 54.2% |
| Modern | 137 | 64 | 64 | 9 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 129 | 72 | 50 | 7 | 55.8% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 129 | 65 | 57 | 7 | 50.4% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 124 | 72 | 50 | 2 | 58.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 43 | 1 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |