David de Feijter: The Chess Journeyman with a Tactical Twist
David de Feijter, known online as DdeFeijter, is a relentless chess enthusiast who has been steadily carving out a niche in the blitz and rapid chess arenas over the past decade. With a peak blitz rating soaring to 1845 in April 2020 and an impressive rapid peak of 2015 achieved as recently as November 2023, David shows that patience and persistence often trump flashy openings.
His journey started around 2016, where his blitz rating hovered in the mid-1500s, but by 2020, he was racking up victories and moments of brilliance, including an explosive 13-game winning streak—a testament to his focus and tactical foresight. David’s style is a fascinating blend of endurance and cunning; he boasts an 80% comeback rate after losing material and doesn’t shy away from grinding lengthy endgames, averaging nearly 67 moves on his winning games.
Speaking of style, David’s play is as strategic as it is resilient. Whether wielding the white pieces with a slightly better than 53% win rate or defending with black at close to 49%, he mixes solid opening knowledge (favoring the English Opening variations and a "Top Secret" arsenal of moves) with a psychological steadiness that keeps tilt at bay—his tilt factor sits modestly at 8, meaning he’s more likely to keep calm sipping coffee than slam the board.
If his recent games say anything, it’s that David enjoys sneaky checkmates and rapid conclusions. His most recent triumphs include devastating mates delivered in just a handful of moves, showcasing his knack for finding that slippery tactical thread when the clock ticks down.
Off the board, David’s record speaks volumes: over 940 wins in blitz alone, complemented by a healthy tally of rapid victories and a respectable bullet win rate, proving he's as comfortable in lightning-fast bullet games as he is in drawn-out rapid battles. Despite some challenging matches against certain tough opponents (looking at you, "masterkroket" with a tricky sub-2% win rate!), David’s resilient spirit shines through.
Fun fact: David’s best time to bring the heat is apparently at 7:00 AM—early riser or coffee-fueled chess ninja? You decide. Either way, he prefers to play on Tuesdays and Wednesdays, where his win rates creep above 54%, proving midweek blues don’t apply to this chess warrior.
Whether you catch him strategizing in blitz, crushing in rapid, or occasionally dabbling in bullet, David de Feijter is a player who embodies the true spirit of the game: a little flair, a lot of grit, and an enduring love for the 64 squares. Check your king—he might just be plotting your downfall next!
Blitz improvement focus
David, your recent blitz games show a dynamic style with good start-of-game activity. You often seize the initiative and keep pieces active, which creates practical chances even in time trouble. To convert more of these chances into wins, you can sharpen your decision-making and endgame technique in fast games.
What you do well
- Quick, principled development and active piece placement in the opening.
- Willingness to complicate the position and keep the action going when you have the initiative.
- Resilience in complex tactical sequences; you don’t shy away from sharp lines and keep trying for the best practical chances.
Key areas to improve
- Time management under pressure. In blitz, a few quick checks and a fast calculation can prevent time trouble and avoid overthinking critical moments.
- Maintain a clear plan in the middlegame. In tactically rich positions, choose 1 plan (for example increasing pressure on a file, targeting a pawn structure, or preparing a king-side attack) and try to stick to it unless a forcing tactical opportunity demands a change.
- Endgame technique and simplification. When the position is favorable or even, decide when to exchange to reach a straightforward endgame you can win, and be wary of trades that give the opponent counterplay.
- Rook and minor-piece endgames. Practice common rook endings and king activity endgames; these are frequent in blitz and often decide close games.
Opening and repertoire guidance
Build a compact, reliable opening set you can play quickly without second-guessing. Focus on 2 White setups you like and 2 Black responses you know well. For example, refine a Nimzo-Larsen Attack line as White and a Scandinavian or English-based system as Black, with a short, consistent middlegame plan for each. Create a simple reference sheet with typical pawn structures and common endgames arising from those lines, and review one model line per week.
Structured training plan
- Daily blitz-focused tactics: 15–20 minutes solving patterns you encounter in your openings (forks, pins, discovered attacks, and tactical ideas in the middlegame).
- Weekly endgame practice: 15 minutes on rook endings and king activity endings to improve conversion in blitz.
- Opening refinement sessions: pick 2 White and 2 Black lines, build a concise cheat sheet with typical middlegame plans, and practice transitions from opening to middlegame in focused drills.
- Time-management drills: in training games, enforce a quick plan for the first 10 moves and practice choosing a forcing continuation when possible.
Next steps
- In your next 5–7 blitz games, aim to implement a simple plan for the opening and avoid unnecessary exchanges that reduce tension when you are ahead.
- Maintain a concise repertoire and practice one clear middlegame plan per game.
- Schedule short daily sessions for tactics and endgames to improve pattern recognition and conversion without overloading training time.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Joey Grochal | 1W / 42L / 1D | View Games |
| Niels de Feijter | 20W / 15L / 5D | View Games |
| Jonathan Quist | 21W / 8L / 3D | View Games |
| StoneIslandfan | 19W / 7L / 2D | View Games |
| Jari Groen | 7W / 15L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1489 | 1825 | ||
| 2024 | 1224 | 1544 | 1825 | |
| 2023 | 1134 | 1555 | 1938 | 400 |
| 2022 | 1701 | |||
| 2021 | 1670 | 1332 | ||
| 2020 | 1054 | 1680 | 1550 | |
| 2019 | 1647 | |||
| 2018 | 1633 | |||
| 2017 | 1614 | |||
| 2016 | 1534 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 16W / 7L / 2D | 12W / 7L / 2D | 69.5 |
| 2024 | 11W / 7L / 4D | 9W / 8L / 0D | 63.4 |
| 2023 | 136W / 79L / 15D | 111W / 105L / 10D | 70.6 |
| 2022 | 91W / 81L / 14D | 87W / 89L / 13D | 71.6 |
| 2021 | 16W / 24L / 3D | 18W / 20L / 4D | 67.8 |
| 2020 | 120W / 90L / 22D | 110W / 101L / 17D | 67.0 |
| 2019 | 28W / 20L / 1D | 26W / 24L / 2D | 64.4 |
| 2018 | 2W / 5L / 1D | 6W / 3L / 0D | 58.9 |
| 2017 | 29W / 27L / 7D | 36W / 24L / 3D | 65.8 |
| 2016 | 124W / 89L / 7D | 107W / 104L / 10D | 64.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 223 | 116 | 95 | 12 | 52.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 190 | 105 | 76 | 9 | 55.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 180 | 93 | 80 | 7 | 51.7% |
| English Opening | 91 | 45 | 41 | 5 | 49.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 87 | 43 | 36 | 8 | 49.4% |
| Dutch Defense | 76 | 28 | 42 | 6 | 36.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 75 | 33 | 38 | 4 | 44.0% |
| Australian Defense | 65 | 30 | 34 | 1 | 46.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 57 | 24 | 29 | 4 | 42.1% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 55 | 30 | 22 | 3 | 54.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 25 | 14 | 10 | 1 | 56.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 23 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 69.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 19 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 68.4% |
| English Opening | 14 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 85.7% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 14.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Dutch Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Hedgehog System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Dutch Defense: Queen's Knight Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |