Eric Lawson - International Master aka deathkni_g_ht
Eric Lawson is not your average chess player; they're an International Master with a reputation for lively blitz battles and cunning tactics. Known online as deathkni_g_ht, Eric has been slicing through ranks with a style that mixes dogged defense with explosive attacks. They're the kind of player who can win on time, win by resignation, or just outwit you in a dazzling checkmate – often before you’ve had your coffee.
Career Highlights & Stats
- Peak blitz rating of 2763 in August 2024 – that’s practically rocket fuel on a chessboard.
- Impressive bullet peak rating of 2580, proving speed is just as lethal as strategy.
- Rapid rating peaking at 2485, because slow and steady isn’t always their game.
- Daily chess peak at 2002, showing even in long games, Eric means business.
Playing Style & Personality
With an 86.79% comeback rate, Eric refuses to go quietly into the night. Losing a piece? No worries, because their win rate after such setbacks hovers near 50%, making them the terrier of the chess world—relentless and tenacious.
Eric’s games tend to be long affairs with an average of 77 moves for victories and even more for losses, suggesting a deep love for intricate endgames (and possibly a penchant for dramatic flair). Their endgame frequency stands tall at 85.46% – if you see Eric still battling past move 50, prepare for a psychological marathon.
Early resignation rate is a polite 0.26%. They don't quit easily, but when they do, you better believe it’s with style or a reason worthy of a chess novel.
Opening Secrets
Eric’s main weapon in blitz games is the enigmatic Top Secret opening, boasting a 52.01% win rate after nearly 10,000 games! Other fan favorites include the Reti Opening Queenside Fianchetto Variation with a sharp 80% success rate and the Sicilian Defense scoring a solid 70%.
In bullet, Eric shines with the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack Modern Variation, winning every single game they've tried it in – bulletproof, in every sense.
Time to Play
While some players prefer morning coffee games, Eric's best hours are surprisingly early – around 5 AM their chess senses peak. Night owls beware!
Erics' best days for winning are Thursday and Wednesday, possibly because midweek chess is the ultimate sanity saver.
Recent Battles
In a recent "Live Chess" game, Eric executed a masterful victory with white in the Slav Defense, culminating in a resignation by their opponent after a tactical onslaught. Against "Dohani," the final moves showed precision and flair – a move 35 pawn capture followed by a calm exf4 sealed the deal.
Yet, even legends have off days: in a swift loss to "Eivissa," Eric found themselves checkmated after a Modern Defense duel. Such is the life of a fierce competitor – exhilarating wins and humbling defeats.
Notable Opponents
Eric’s fiercest rivalries include frequent matches with rasan04 (42 clashes), omeed_87, and ggmorrow. Despite the fierce battles, Eric’s overall blitz record boasts more wins than losses (5,287 wins vs. 4,200 losses), showing a strong grip on competitive consistency.
Anecdote
It’s rumored that Eric once won a bullet game while brewing tea, answering emails, and brainstorming a business plan simultaneously – true proof that some chess players operate on a different plane of multitasking.
If chess was a blockbuster movie, Eric Lawson would be the unpredictable hero with a few surprises in their opening repertoire and a flair for theatrical endgames.
Strengths and positive trends
Eric, you’re showing strong practical play in rapid chess. You’ve built a solid opening base with reliable results in the Caro-Kann and Barnes Defense, and you’ve demonstrated the ability to convert complex middlegames into decisive outcomes, including tactical finishes when the position allows. Your rating trend over the past year is upward, which indicates steady improvement and good consistency in your results.
- You spot tactical chances and press when the opponent’s king is exposed, often converting pressure into a win.
- You maintain active, coordinated piece play, especially when you’re able to use heavy pieces to create threats against the enemy king.
- Your opening choices (Caro-Kann and Barnes Defense) give you solid, playable middlegames with clear plans.
Opening performance and practical plans
Your openings show strong results in Barnes Defense and Caro-Kann Defense, with high win rates and clean conversion of positions. Those lines tend to yield solid pawn structures and clear middlegame plans, which fit well with your tactical style when opportunities arise. Some of the more aggressive lines you’ve tried (like certain Sicilian family setups or experimental gambits) can yield big swings, which is fine in rapid play as long as you’re comfortable with the resulting positions.
- Barnes Defense: very high win rate. Continue refining your typical middlegame plans and your piece coordination after development.
- Caro-Kann Defense: proven reliability. Maintain solid development and look for controlled breaks to seize the initiative.
- Other aggressive openings (e.g., Amar Gambit, aggressive Sicilian lines): good for surprise value, but pair with a clear plan and solid defense to avoid overextension.
Key improvement areas
- Keep king safety and development as the first priority in the opening. Avoid early overextensions on the kingside (for example, early pawn pushes that create long-term weaknesses) unless you have a concrete plan to justify them.
- Improve transition from opening to middlegame by establishing a clear plan. Before leaping into tactical tries, confirm a central or positional objective you’re aiming to achieve in the next 5–10 moves.
- Strengthen endgame readiness. In rapid games, many wins come from converting small advantages; practice king-and-pawn endgames and simple rook endgames to maximize conversion chances.
- Time management in critical moments. Allocate a portion of your thinking time to verifying a plan, not only calculating tactics. Use a quick “what is the plan?” check before committing to long tactical sequences.
- Broadening your repertoire with a couple of solid, repeatable lines for both sides can reduce decision fatigue and improve consistency in rapid games.
Practical next steps
- Focus on two classical openings that suit your style (for Black: Caro-Kann and Barnes Defense; for White: a solid, non-gimmick setup that you know well). Deepen the typical middlegame plans, common pawn structures, and key endgames arising from those lines.
- Integrate a 15–20 minute post-game review after each rapid game. Write down one to two concrete takeaways: a strategic plan you missed, a tactical motif you overlooked, or a defensive resource you could have used.
- Practice tactical puzzles daily that emphasize mating patterns, back-rank themes, and common tactical motifs seen in your games.
- Include 1–2 endgame drills per week (rook endings, king-and-pawn endings) to improve convertibility of slight advantages into wins.
- Schedule focused opening study sessions: reinforce Caro-Kann and Barnes Defense plans, and allocate a small amount of time to experiment with one surprise line each month to keep opponents guessing.
Would you like a tailored 4‑week training plan?
If you’d like, I can convert these insights into a concrete 4-week plan with daily puzzle targets, post-game review prompts, and a structured opening study schedule that aligns with your strengths and goals in rapid play. I can also create a short PGN checklist for each game you plan to analyze, focusing on the key improvement areas listed above.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pochochino | 3W / 3L / 1D | View |
| rijeka_trsat | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| gekidanrararai | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| needattention02 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| rap_woyska | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| zzzzaakk | 3W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Olga Dm. Karmanova | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Ristic Nebojsa | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| stronghg_pcap | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| timmyboy554 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bailey | 51W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| Rasan04 | 17W / 23L / 3D | View Games |
| Omid Malek | 21W / 9L / 1D | View Games |
| Ali Ekber Doğan | 10W / 15L / 2D | View Games |
| Mihael Ankerst | 22W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2651 | 2635 | 2605 | 2002 |
| 2024 | 2494 | 2536 | 2342 | |
| 2023 | 2294 | 2496 | 2342 | |
| 2022 | 1953 | 2500 | 1824 | |
| 2021 | 2530 | |||
| 2020 | 1803 | 2347 | 1981 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 667W / 471L / 76D | 628W / 497L / 89D | 84.4 |
| 2024 | 584W / 479L / 85D | 538W / 528L / 75D | 87.0 |
| 2023 | 664W / 471L / 93D | 632W / 522L / 75D | 85.0 |
| 2022 | 315W / 233L / 25D | 291W / 243L / 28D | 80.1 |
| 2021 | 816W / 561L / 116D | 787W / 602L / 103D | 80.9 |
| 2020 | 166W / 83L / 13D | 132W / 107L / 16D | 73.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 935 | 491 | 386 | 58 | 52.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 739 | 416 | 284 | 39 | 56.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 653 | 354 | 255 | 44 | 54.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 640 | 334 | 258 | 48 | 52.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 524 | 282 | 209 | 33 | 53.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 479 | 245 | 206 | 28 | 51.1% |
| Australian Defense | 451 | 238 | 175 | 38 | 52.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 323 | 188 | 124 | 11 | 58.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 292 | 159 | 117 | 16 | 54.5% |
| Czech Defense | 281 | 155 | 115 | 11 | 55.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 26 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 73.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 22 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 54.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 21 | 20 | 1 | 0 | 95.2% |
| Australian Defense | 13 | 11 | 1 | 1 | 84.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 12 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 41.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 71.4% |
| Döry Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 42 | 19 | 20 | 3 | 45.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 34 | 21 | 11 | 2 | 61.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 32 | 20 | 8 | 4 | 62.5% |
| Australian Defense | 21 | 17 | 3 | 1 | 81.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 18 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 72.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 14 | 8 | 5 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Czech Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 1 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |