Biography
Te Time is an online chess player whose blitz instincts turn rapid games into entertaining battles. Emerging on the scene around 2020, they quickly learned that tempo beats brute force, and that a well-timed gambit can be worth a thousand quiet moves. Across thousands of online blitz games, Te Time has built a reputation for sharp, creative play, a fearless willingness to sac a piece for momentum, and a smile that widens when the clock starts ticking down.
Blitz is their preferred battlefield, where speed and precision collide. They blend fast decision-making with stubborn defense and a penchant for bold openings.
2256 (2024-09-14)Blitz Chronicle
In blitz, Te Time has demonstrated notable resilience and improvisational flair. A peak blitz rating of 2256 (2024-09-14) marks a high point in a busy, ongoing journey. Their blitz chart traces a steady climb through the early 2020s and a continued, energetic presence into 2025.
Opening Performance (Blitz)
Opening choices reveal a taste for dynamic, principled play. Highlights from blitz performance include:
- Czech Defense — Games: 336, Wins: 197, Losses: 131, Draws: 8; Win rate: 58.63% Czech Defense
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation — Games: 182, Wins: 114, Losses: 64, Draws: 4; Win rate: 62.64% Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Scandinavian Defense — Games: 111, Wins: 58, Losses: 49, Draws: 4; Win rate: 52.25% Scandinavian Defense
- Modern — Games: 91, Wins: 46, Losses: 40, Draws: 5; Win rate: 50.55%
- Caro-Kann Defense — Games: 90, Wins: 49, Losses: 36, Draws: 5; Win rate: 54.44% Caro-Kann Defense
- Barnes Defense — Games: 82, Wins: 57, Losses: 22, Draws: 3; Win rate: 69.51% Barnes Defense
- Sicilian Defense — Games: 78, Wins: 52, Losses: 25, Draws: 1; Win rate: 66.67% Sicilian Defense
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation — Games: 47, Wins: 30, Losses: 15, Draws: 2; Win rate: 63.83% Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation
Streaks and Style
Streaks sketch a picture of momentum and resilience. Longest Winning Streak: 16. Current Winning Streak: 1. Longest Losing Streak: 13. Current Losing Streak: 0. Endgames are a strong suit, with frequent conversions from tricky middlegames to practical victories.
Rivals and Time of Play
On the online boards, Te Time has shared many battles with a roster of frequent opponents. Notable rivals include: billy_da_butcher, GMDong69, and Socrates.
What went well in your recent blitz games
You showed strong willingness to press when you had a tactical edge. In your wins, you attacked actively on the kingside, coordinated multiple pieces, and kept up the pressure until you finished the game decisively. You also demonstrated good capacity to convert initiative into concrete threats, and you stayed focused through complex sequences to reach a winning endgame or finish with a decisive tactical sequence.
- Sharp calculation when lines opened up, resulting in clear attacking chances and, in at least one game, a clean finish by forcing decisive threats on the opponent's king.
- Active piece play: your queen, rooks, and minor pieces found open lines and good squares, creating multiple simultaneous threats for your opponent to defend.
- Endgame conversion: when the position simplified, you kept pressure and converted material or positional advantages into a win.
Key improvement areas for blitz
- Time management and pacing: in blitz, aim to maintain a steady tempo and avoid spending too long on non-forcing moves. Develop a quick three-option candidate approach on tough positions and pick the best plan rather than exploring many deep lines at once.
- Defensive discipline: in some middlegame twists, avoid over-pressing for material if it exposes your king or weakens king safety. Quick checks for checks, threats, and concrete recaptures can prevent counterplay.
- Ending technique: practice simplifying to practical endgames when you have material or positional advantages, especially in rook and minor-piece endings. Knowing a few standard endgame methods (e.g., how to convert a rook+pawn vs rook endgame) helps in fast time controls.
- Opening consolidation: pick a small, solid opening set and stick with it for a few games to reduce early confusion. This frees mental energy for the middlegame and tactics.
- Pattern recognition: sharpen common blitz motifs such as back-rank ideas, fork/grab tactics, and typical mating nets. Regular puzzle practice focused on these themes speeds up calculation in real games.
Opening strategy to reinforce
Your openings show reliable results in several lines. To reduce decision fatigue in blitz and keep your play sharp, consider concentrating on 2–3 openings for consistency. Based on the data, these look promising to deepen first:
- Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation — a solid, slightly offbeat choice that can steer the game into structured middlegames where your tactical feel can shine. Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation — a familiar, classical route with clear plans for both sides; good for practicing strategic play and piece activity. Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation
- Bullish but practical option: Scandinavian or a strategic line you’re comfortable with — use it to build confidence in the first 15 moves without getting tangled in novelty lines. Scandinavian Defense
Tip: once you settle on a couple of openings, create a short, private cheat sheet with the main plans, typical pawn structures, and key move orders. This helps you react quickly in blitz.
Practice plan for the next week
- Play a focused blitz set (e.g., 20–30 games across a few sessions) using the two selected openings, aiming for consistent plans rather than exploring new lines every game.
- Do daily tactical puzzles (10–15 minutes) focused on patterns like back-rank ideas, pins and forks, and quick forcing lines.
- Endgame micro-sessions: practice 5–10 minute rook endings and minor-piece endings to build familiarity with practical conversion.
- Time-management drills: in one session per day, use a stricter clock (shorter overall time) to train making solid, fast decisions and avoid overthinking.
- Review one or two games after each session. Write down the key turning points: where you gained momentum, where you spent too long, and what you could have done differently at the moment.
Notes and placeholders
If you want, I can tailor this feedback to a particular opponent or draft a short annotated set from your most recent games. You can link to specific openings you want to study with placeholders like this:
- Openings focus: Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation
- Openings focus: Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| cocovitschl77 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Rafał Lewandowski | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| sssami92 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sevarka64 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| nkechi | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| salindatu | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| dralzheimer | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| fiveminutespeace | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| kryemjeshtri66 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| kupri777 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| billy_da_butcher | 71W / 98L / 9D | |
| GMDong69 | 54W / 76L / 2D | |
| Socrates | 55W / 67L / 6D | |
| jfk1978 | 53W / 60L / 3D | |
| madmax9095 | 44W / 65L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2080 | 2202 | 2101 | |
| 2024 | 2205 | 2037 | 2050 | |
| 2023 | 2291 | 2204 | 1989 | |
| 2022 | 2116 | 1809 | 2075 | |
| 2021 | 2118 | 1797 | 2026 | |
| 2020 | 2213 | 1752 | 2041 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3037W / 3088L / 234D | 2850W / 3272L / 231D | 81.7 |
| 2024 | 3443W / 3495L / 243D | 3115W / 3775L / 282D | 81.0 |
| 2023 | 3613W / 3605L / 281D | 3167W / 4017L / 285D | 81.3 |
| 2022 | 2495W / 2157L / 123D | 2221W / 2355L / 162D | 79.4 |
| 2021 | 1961W / 1917L / 109D | 1769W / 2139L / 126D | 77.9 |
| 2020 | 2841W / 2698L / 179D | 2496W / 2970L / 219D | 77.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 11330 | 5129 | 5815 | 386 | 45.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 6638 | 3507 | 2890 | 241 | 52.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3814 | 1831 | 1858 | 125 | 48.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3725 | 1549 | 2030 | 146 | 41.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 3429 | 1364 | 1945 | 120 | 39.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 3005 | 1319 | 1591 | 95 | 43.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2632 | 1487 | 1080 | 65 | 56.5% |
| Modern | 2588 | 1064 | 1424 | 100 | 41.1% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 2217 | 970 | 1164 | 83 | 43.8% |
| French Defense | 2161 | 933 | 1162 | 66 | 43.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 243 | 113 | 118 | 12 | 46.5% |
| Czech Defense | 206 | 104 | 91 | 11 | 50.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 197 | 83 | 104 | 10 | 42.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 96 | 46 | 44 | 6 | 47.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 80 | 34 | 45 | 1 | 42.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 60 | 33 | 26 | 1 | 55.0% |
| French Defense | 53 | 20 | 30 | 3 | 37.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 49 | 27 | 21 | 1 | 55.1% |
| Modern | 49 | 23 | 26 | 0 | 46.9% |
| Petrov's Defense | 41 | 21 | 19 | 1 | 51.2% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 419 | 231 | 179 | 9 | 55.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 237 | 140 | 89 | 8 | 59.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 126 | 63 | 59 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 110 | 60 | 45 | 5 | 54.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 102 | 65 | 34 | 3 | 63.7% |
| Modern | 102 | 51 | 44 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 91 | 59 | 31 | 1 | 64.8% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 67 | 43 | 22 | 2 | 64.2% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 58 | 37 | 17 | 4 | 63.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 56 | 31 | 24 | 1 | 55.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |