Profile of diamondop
Meet diamondop, a chess aficionado whose journey through the 64 squares is a thrilling blend of strategic warfare and controlled chaos. With a peak bullet rating soaring at an astonishing 2401 and a blitz max rating of 2274, diamondop is no stranger to the adrenaline rush of fast-paced chess battles.
Playing Style and Strengths
Diamondop’s chess style is an intriguing cocktail: a fearless tactician who loves complex positions and thrives in endgames, boasting a remarkable comeback rate of 80.8%. This player’s games usually average around 67 moves, proving that patience and persistence are key. Early resignations happen rarely (just 4.22%), so expect diamondop to fight tooth and nail until the final checkmate or clock ticks down.
Known for embracing the Bishop's Opening and Van't Kruijs Opening, diamondop often keeps opponents guessing before striking with a precise combination of classic defenses like the Caro-Kann and the Kings Fianchetto. In bullet chess, they wield openings like the Scandinavian Defense, with a win rate just over 50%, showcasing their adaptability under pressure.
Noteworthy Stats & Quirks
- With almost 10,000 wins in bullet chess alone, diamondop’s thumbs must be faster than a speeding bullet.
- The longest winning streak clocks at an impressive 22 games; the longest losing streak, a humbling 23.
- Active mostly during late hours, the best time of day to challenge diamondop is 11 PM—but beware, they might already be warmed up for a killer endgame.
- Average win rates tilt slightly when playing white (45.58%) versus black (43.73%), which means whether lighting up the board or defending shadows, diamondop stays fierce.
Recent Adventures
Diamondop recently dazzled with a gritty victory in the Old Benoni Defense, winning on time against the formidable tahirpk1, navigating a complex middlegame with razor-sharp precision. Another highlight includes a swift checkmate victory employing the Englund Gambit, proving that sometimes a bit of audacious gambit pays off handsomely.
Like any warrior, diamondop has tasted defeat, including a tough loss in the Caro-Kann Defense Exchange Variation. Yet, with such a fierce win record, one loss won’t stop diamondop from shaking the chess world.
Psychology and Mind Games
With a tilt factor of 23—a number indicating a mix of fiery passion and occasional frustration—diamondop's psychological resilience is as entertaining as their chess skills. They tend to resist the temptation to quit early and bounce back stronger, making comebacks and stolen wins part of their signature style.
Fun Fact
The “diamond” in diamondop isn’t just a username—it reflects brilliance under pressure, toughness, and a multifaceted approach to the game. Rumor has it diamondop’s chess pieces sparkle after a tough victory.
Whether you’re a casual fan or a fellow contender, watching diamondop in action is a lesson in grit, creativity, and relentless pursuit of checkmate. Just make sure your king is ready!
What your recent bullet games reveal
Your bullet play shows a good feel for sharp tactics and keeping pressure on your opponent under time constraints. In your winning game, you found active moves that created concrete threats and capitalized on mistakes, while your losses and the draw suggest there are moments where the position becomes unclear or you need a steadier plan as the clock runs down.
Highlights from your most recent win
You demonstrated willingness to seize the initiative with forcing lines and piece activity. The game featured a sequence where you pressed with accurate exchanges and kept your opponent on the defensive, ultimately converting your advantage before the end of the clock. Key takeaway: in bullet, looking for one or two forcing ideas that push your opponent into difficult decisions helps you keep control when time is short.
Strengths to lean into
- Quick tactical eye: you spot tactical motifs and are good at turning them into practical threats in the moment.
- Resourcefulness under time pressure: you use the clock as a weapon, creating practical problems for your opponent even when the position is complex.
- Initiative generation: you tend to seek active plans rather than passively waiting for your opponent to commit first.
Areas to improve
- Plan consistency in the middlegame: after the opening, pause to identify a clear plan (control the center, activate rooks, target a weak back rank, etc.) and steer the game toward that plan rather than chasing tactics alone.
- Opening handling and early center contest: in the loss and draw games, there were moments where Black or White seized the center or created a strong pawn structure after a few moves. Build a compact, reliable opening repertoire and a simple middlegame plan against common responses to your first moves.
- Endgame technique in bullet: when many pieces remain, convert advantages efficiently. Practice rook and minor piece endgames with a focus on king activity and opposition timing to avoid drifting into unclear endings.
- Time management discipline: in very short time controls, commit to rapid assessments and pre-manded plans. Develop a small set of go-to ideas for the first 6-8 moves so you don’t stall and miss forcing chances.
Practical drills you can try
- Daily short tactics (5–10 minutes) focusing on forks, skewers, pins, and discovered attacks to sharpen quick calculation.
- Opening familiarity: pick 2-3 openings you enjoy and study a few typical middlegame plans for each. Practice these in quick games to build a reliable framework.
- 1–2 move lookahead: in bullet, before each move, ask yourself “What is my opponent threatening in the next move, and what is my immediate plan?”
- Endgame quick wins: work through rook endgames and simple king-and-pawn endings to improve conversion in shorter games.
Next steps
Keep leveraging your tactical strength, but couple it with a tighter middlegame plan and improved time management. A small, repeatable opening and a clear plan after the first 8–10 moves will help you convert more of your opportunities into wins and reduce draws and losses in bullet. You’re on a positive trajectory with notable resilience under pressure—continue building the habit of quick, structured evaluations during each game.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| tien_2013 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| chess_enjoyer03 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| dirtyflaggeralert | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| dna_daovinhdat2009 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| andersspike | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| anthonylungz7 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Stefchezz | 4W / 4L / 0D | View |
| argiftw | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Marcos Francisco Quesada Blanco | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| 12norbi | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| aayushkabrachess | 728W / 482L / 102D | View Games |
| LordGigantics | 227W / 447L / 35D | View Games |
| saisatyanandmandol | 287W / 310L / 20D | View Games |
| vicharan | 89W / 191L / 5D | View Games |
| xclevertactics | 97W / 152L / 17D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2307 | 2102 | 1996 | |
| 2024 | 2166 | 2175 | 1845 | |
| 2023 | 2175 | 1935 | 1860 | |
| 2022 | 2148 | 1942 | 1990 | 1621 |
| 2021 | 2215 | 1965 | 2044 | 1621 |
| 2020 | 2003 | 1886 | 1353 | 1757 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 461W / 424L / 63D | 369W / 506L / 65D | 75.5 |
| 2024 | 284W / 286L / 36D | 260W / 314L / 38D | 74.7 |
| 2023 | 645W / 731L / 91D | 646W / 705L / 85D | 74.1 |
| 2022 | 1584W / 1784L / 222D | 1478W / 1906L / 219D | 73.6 |
| 2021 | 2404W / 2572L / 294D | 2364W / 2642L / 289D | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 1183W / 1199L / 116D | 1155W / 1237L / 106D | 55.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2476 | 1142 | 1207 | 127 | 46.1% |
| Australian Defense | 2141 | 923 | 1098 | 120 | 43.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1375 | 581 | 720 | 74 | 42.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1252 | 594 | 593 | 65 | 47.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1034 | 393 | 584 | 57 | 38.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 670 | 275 | 357 | 38 | 41.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 524 | 235 | 258 | 31 | 44.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 504 | 225 | 240 | 39 | 44.6% |
| Slav Defense | 492 | 206 | 263 | 23 | 41.9% |
| Modern | 487 | 219 | 251 | 17 | 45.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 90 | 41 | 43 | 6 | 45.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 53 | 20 | 30 | 3 | 37.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 41 | 19 | 19 | 3 | 46.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 27 | 12 | 13 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 23 | 5 | 15 | 3 | 21.7% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 21 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 52.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 20 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 55.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 19 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 57.9% |
| King's Indian Defense | 18 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 17 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 52.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 431 | 223 | 184 | 24 | 51.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 399 | 162 | 211 | 26 | 40.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 336 | 157 | 162 | 17 | 46.7% |
| Bishop's Opening | 331 | 152 | 158 | 21 | 45.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 229 | 109 | 110 | 10 | 47.6% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 220 | 118 | 86 | 16 | 53.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 204 | 91 | 101 | 12 | 44.6% |
| Unknown | 186 | 80 | 100 | 6 | 43.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 172 | 70 | 96 | 6 | 40.7% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 145 | 72 | 66 | 7 | 49.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 23.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Unknown Opening* | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Center Game | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 1 |
| Losing | 23 | 0 |