Dino Dino - The Chess Fossil with a Roaring Tactical Mind
Not a creature from the Mesozoic era, but rather a modern chess player whose rating history evokes the steady evolution of a dinosaur adapting through the epochs of online chess. With a Blitz rating peaking near 1083, and a Rapid rating that once soared close to 1337, Dino's gameplay is anything but prehistoric.
Since bursting onto the scene in 2012, Dino has amassed an impressive record—especially in Blitz and Rapid formats—showing a resilience that would make even the toughest Stegosaurus look like a soft prey. His remarkable 77.32% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win record after losing a piece showcase a tenacity that could rival the fiercest predator.
His playing style is as steady and calculated as a Brachiosaurus reaching for leaves—preferring long endgames with an average of 63 moves per win, and a penchant to avoid early resignations. A tilt factor of 27 suggests Dino stays cooler than an Ice Age chill, while his opening preferences include solid staples like the King's Pawn Opening and the Center Game, with win rates nearly as sturdy as fossilized bones.
Dino’s favorite openings in Blitz include the King's Pawn Opening—a classic choice with a win rate just shy of 50%—and the Center Game, where he excavates victories with over 55% success. Not one to be caught in rapid extinction, Dino adapts well in both rapid and blitz time controls, constantly evolving his game to survive and thrive.
Off the board, Dino embraces a biological pun or two, perhaps joking that while others hunt for opening traps, he'll always find the Jurassic park-mate's weaknesses! His current opponents often fall victim to his cunning bony strategy, reminding us all that in the wild jungle of chess, Dino reigns supreme.
"Adapt or get checkmated!" is the uncrowned motto of this player, whose presence in the chess ecosystem is as significant as the fossils he cheekily nods to with his name.
Quick recap — your recent games
Nice work staying active and fighting in messy positions. Quick notes on the three recent results you sent:
- Win vs aelmgs — a long, tactical middlegame where you kept putting pressure and eventually your opponent flagged (won on time). Good persistence and piece activity. (See the game below.)
- Loss vs sepsc — you got into a tactical/ending sequence that ended with a mating net on the back rank. The game snowballed after some exchanges left your king exposed.
- Other recent losses — several games ended quickly with tactical shots against your king or hanging pieces. These are the kind of mistakes that come from not seeing simple motifs or from time trouble.
What you're doing well
- Active piece play — you move pieces toward the target and keep creating threats instead of sitting passively.
- Willingness to simplify when appropriate — you trade when necessary and look for clear routes to attack or counterplay.
- Opening choice that fits you — you play the Center Game and similar lines frequently; that familiarity gives you practical advantages against many opponents.
- Resilience — you keep playing long games and create problems for the opponent instead of resigning early.
Main areas to improve (high priority)
- Basic tactics and pattern recognition — many losses come from simple tactical shots (forks, pins, back-rank mates). Daily 10–15 minutes of tactical puzzles keyed to these patterns will cut those losses quickly.
- King safety and back-rank awareness — in a few losses your king ended up exposed or trapped behind pawns. When trading down, ask: “Is my king safe on the back rank?” If not, create luft or get a rook off the back rank.
- Time management — a win came from the opponent’s flag. Relying on flags is fine sometimes, but aim to convert winning positions earlier and avoid getting yourself low on time. Try spending a hair more time on critical moments (captures, checks, major imbalances).
- Avoid early queen shuffling — moving the queen repeatedly in the opening invites development and tempo loss. Focus on minor piece development and king safety first.
- Endgame basics — a couple of the losses show missed opportunities in rook/queen endgames. Practice a few core endgames (king + pawn vs king, basic rook endgames) so you can convert and defend confidently.
Concrete next steps — 4‑week plan
- Daily (15–25 min): tactics set focused on forks, pins, skewers, back-rank mates. Keep a log of the motifs you miss and review them weekly.
- 3× a week (20–30 min): one slow (10+0 or 15|10) game where you avoid premoves and focus on converting advantages. After each game, spend 5–10 minutes annotating two moments: one good decision and one mistake.
- 2× a week (15–20 min): endgame drills — king + pawn, basic rook endings, and basic queen-vs-pawn endings. Learn the key defensive ideas and the simple winning plans.
- Opening drill (weekly): pick one reliable line in the Center Game and learn 5 moves of a sound plan (typical middlegame structures and piece placements). Memorize plans, not only moves.
- Time-control habit: in 10–15 minute games, try to keep at least 1:30 on the clock after the opening (~move 15). If you consistently drop below that, slow down and make one “planning” move every few moves to buy time for critical decisions.
Practical tips you can use immediately
- Before any exchange, ask: “Does this open lines against my king?” If yes, pause and calculate one extra move.
- When ahead in material, simplify if the simplification reduces the opponent’s counterplay. If you’re ahead with queens on the board, trade into a winning endgame when safe.
- When you see a tactic candidate (capture, check, attack a loose piece), stop the clock for a second and scan opponent responses — most blunders are rushed.
- Make a checklist for critical positions: material, king safety, hanging pieces, checks, and opponent threats. Run it before moving in time trouble.
Game review — your recent win (play through)
Replay the win vs aelmgs and spot the turning points: where you gained activity and how you kept pressure until the opponent flagged.
Short checklist to use during games
- Move candidate? Check: captures, checks, threats — and opponent replies.
- Are any pieces hanging or undefended after my move? (Scan the board for en prise pieces.)
- Is my king safe next turn? If not, seek immediate consolidation.
- Am I winning by material or position? If material, trade to reduce counterplay; if positional, keep tension and improve pieces.
If you want, I can...
- Walk through the loss vs sepsc move-by-move and highlight the critical tactical misses.
- Create a 2‑week tactical routine tailored to your most-missed motifs (forks, pins, back-rank).
- Make a short opening crib sheet for your favored Center Game lines showing common middlegame plans.
Tell me which of those you'd like and I’ll prepare it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| seolfort | 0W / 21L / 0D | View Games |
| anddasilva | 3W / 3L / 1D | View Games |
| bayli360 | 6W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| jhon198517 | 4W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| muhlis1 | 2W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 737 | 603 | 677 | 766 |
| 2024 | 799 | 817 | 780 | |
| 2023 | 892 | 774 | 802 | 773 |
| 2022 | 884 | 789 | 879 | 786 |
| 2021 | 992 | 862 | 968 | |
| 2020 | 1062 | 951 | 987 | |
| 2019 | 824 | 896 | 904 | |
| 2018 | 819 | 987 | ||
| 2017 | 735 | 966 | 961 | |
| 2016 | 772 | 842 | 1179 | 971 |
| 2015 | 734 | 792 | 1170 | 929 |
| 2014 | 618 | 758 | 1159 | 1026 |
| 2013 | 709 | 768 | 989 | |
| 2012 | 825 | 740 | 901 | 1128 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 778W / 628L / 73D | 604W / 801L / 81D | 72.2 |
| 2024 | 788W / 674L / 76D | 676W / 790L / 75D | 72.3 |
| 2023 | 713W / 643L / 77D | 635W / 713L / 80D | 72.2 |
| 2022 | 1037W / 935L / 103D | 909W / 1031L / 150D | 73.0 |
| 2021 | 910W / 778L / 114D | 757W / 912L / 114D | 73.2 |
| 2020 | 768W / 660L / 76D | 656W / 769L / 85D | 70.7 |
| 2019 | 315W / 315L / 23D | 297W / 305L / 24D | 64.6 |
| 2018 | 370W / 330L / 24D | 327W / 365L / 23D | 63.5 |
| 2017 | 343W / 296L / 22D | 307W / 330L / 28D | 62.8 |
| 2016 | 217W / 192L / 12D | 185W / 213L / 17D | 64.4 |
| 2015 | 281W / 280L / 11D | 267W / 286L / 16D | 64.3 |
| 2014 | 159W / 160L / 8D | 136W / 186L / 12D | 62.8 |
| 2013 | 155W / 199L / 12D | 141W / 224L / 16D | 61.7 |
| 2012 | 30W / 34L / 1D | 17W / 51L / 2D | 63.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 1753 | 787 | 878 | 88 | 44.9% |
| French Defense | 649 | 293 | 324 | 32 | 45.1% |
| Center Game | 575 | 296 | 258 | 21 | 51.5% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 575 | 246 | 298 | 31 | 42.8% |
| Australian Defense | 470 | 211 | 220 | 39 | 44.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 413 | 175 | 215 | 23 | 42.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 337 | 184 | 134 | 19 | 54.6% |
| Czech Defense | 263 | 145 | 102 | 16 | 55.1% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 144 | 80 | 58 | 6 | 55.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 108 | 41 | 59 | 8 | 38.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 4342 | 1970 | 2124 | 248 | 45.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 1955 | 895 | 972 | 88 | 45.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1825 | 895 | 866 | 64 | 49.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 1546 | 759 | 713 | 74 | 49.1% |
| Australian Defense | 1374 | 609 | 690 | 75 | 44.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1238 | 522 | 641 | 75 | 42.2% |
| Center Game | 1162 | 652 | 448 | 62 | 56.1% |
| French Defense | 866 | 427 | 409 | 30 | 49.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 847 | 411 | 399 | 37 | 48.5% |
| Czech Defense | 597 | 295 | 263 | 39 | 49.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 12.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 7 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 14.3% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bishop's Opening | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Center Game | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 73 | 32 | 39 | 2 | 43.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 28 | 17 | 11 | 0 | 60.7% |
| Australian Defense | 27 | 10 | 14 | 3 | 37.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 26 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 57.7% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 19 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 68.4% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 17 | 12 | 5 | 0 | 70.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 17 | 4 | 11 | 2 | 23.5% |
| Center Game | 16 | 7 | 9 | 0 | 43.8% |
| French Defense | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Modern | 13 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 23.1% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 27 | 1 |