Domingos Junior - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Once upon a chessboard, Domingos Junior emerged from the shadows of 931 blitz rating in 2017 to become a formidable FIDE Master with a blazing peak blitz rating soaring beyond 2600 by 2025. Known online as Domingosjunior, this player’s journey is a thrilling rollercoaster of wins, learning curves, and a sprinkle of untouchable tactical flair.
Starting with a single blitz game (which they won, obviously), Domingos quickly hooked the chess world with a vigorous climb — hitting a sensational 2517 blitz rating by 2023. Their bullet rating tells a similar tale of velocity, smashing through 2500+ with rapid-fire precision and resilience that would make even the fastest grandmasters blink twice.
Style & Strategy
An endgame enthusiast (they face a staggering 72.77% endgame frequency), Domingos is not one to resign early — only giving up 2.78% of the time, probably out of respect for the game. With an average of nearly 67 moves per win, it's clear that Domingos loves the long, strategic dance, fighting every inch of the way until victory is secured. Notably, they bounce back with ferocity, sporting a comeback rate of nearly 78% and boast a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece — a true Phoenix of the chessboard!
Personality on the Board
With a tilt factor of just 9, Domingos keeps their cool most of the time... though sometimes even champions need a moment with the chessboard’s tea and sympathy. Their psychological game is sharp too, often winning more with White (61.52%) but definitely never a pushover with Black (58.3%).
Opponents beware: their longest winning streak is an eye-popping 23 games, proving that once Domingos finds their rhythm, it’s practically unstoppable.
Fun Facts
- Has played over 3400 games using a “Top Secret” opening strategy in blitz, winning over 60% of them – maybe the secret is actually just jaw-dropping tactics.
- Has a curious habit of playing their best chess late in the evening, with a 70.34% win rate at 7 PM and 75% at 6 AM. Night owl or early bird? Domingos is both.
- Masters the comeback like a magician — lost a piece? No problem, Domingos wins anyway every time.
Whether blitz, bullet, or rapid, Domingos Junior is a name to remember — a tactical genius, resilient fighter, and chess player with stories to tell one move at a time. Next time you see Domingosjunior on the board, you might want to start praying or dusting off your best opening repertoire.
Recent rapid play feedback
You’ve shown the ability to seize the initiative and convert pressure into a win in some games. When the position grows sharp or you face sustained counterplay, there are moments where you can improve your plan and timing to keep the initiative and convert dominating positions into a clean win.
In games where the fight lasts longer or your opponent creates tactical challenges, the key is to stay concise with your plan, avoid over-pressing, and tighten your calculation in critical moments. You’ve demonstrated resilience, especially in middlegame confrontations, and with structured practice you can push those strengths further.
What you do well
- Active piece play: you tend to activate your pieces and coordinate them toward aggressive ideas when the opportunity arises.
- Ability to create practical chances: you frequently generate practical threats that test your opponent’s defenses, especially in open or semi-open positions.
- Resilience in complex middlegames: you maintain pressure and look for tactical chances even when the position gets messy.
- Endgame potential: you show perseverance and an eye for converting small advantages into a win as the game simplifies.
Areas to improve
- Opening planning and consistency: some openings you try lead to sharp counterplay or unclear middlegame plans. Build a compact opening repertoire with two to three reliable lines and a clear middlegame goal for each.
- Decision making under time pressure: in tighter time controls, strengthening a simple, repeatable decision process will help you avoid getting lost in long calculations where progress stalls.
- Endgame technique: practice common rook and minor-piece endgames, focusing on king activity, pawn structure, and two- or three-move plan sequences to convert advantages.
- Pattern recognition and tactics: regular, targeted tactical puzzles (especially involving king safety, threats on open files, and forcing moves) will improve your ability to spot critical sequences faster.
Opening performance highlights
Your results with several openings show promise in the Caro-Kann family and in certain Sicilian lines. Stirring through these can give you a solid, flexible base to build from. There are some openings that have been more challenging for you, so it’s wise to have a plan for those as well.
- Caro-Kann Defense variants are strong choices for you; deepen your understanding of standard plans and typical pawn structures in these lines.
- Sicilian Defense lines like the Opocensky Variation (Najdorf area) have shown good results when you maintain consistent plans and piece activity.
- French Defense lines you’ve faced have been tougher; consider reinforcing a simpler, safer approach if you continue with this path, or switch to a line you’re more comfortable with in rapid games.
- Other solid lines (such as Kan/Gipslis family ideas) show potential; continue building a compact set of go-to responses you trust in these structures.
Training plan and practical steps
- Openings: Pick two to three openings you enjoy (for example, Caro-Kann and a Sicilian line). For each, memorize a simple plan: how you want to develop, how you will contest the center, and a basic plan for the middlegame.
- Tactics: do 15–20 minutes of puzzles daily focusing on king safety, open-files, and forcing sequences. Aim to recognize key tactical motifs quickly.
- Endgames: weekly practice on rook endings and simple pawn endings. Learn two or three generic endgame conversion ideas you can apply in most rook endings.
- Time management: in every game, set a personal milestone for the opening (first 15 moves) and for the middlegame (decide on a concrete plan within two candidate lines). Reserve a small, fixed amount of time for complex moments and avoid overthinking simple decisions.
- Review habit: after each game, write down one correct decision you made and one area you could improve. If you have a trusted engine, use it to validate your key decisions, but rely on your own planning first.
Next steps (quick 2-week plan)
- Week 1: Lock in two openings you enjoy. Build a short, practical plan for each opening and practice at least two representative middlegame themes from each line.
- Week 2: Add focused endgame drills (rook endings and king activity). Do one tactical puzzle session daily and analyze at least two games from your recent pool with a focus on the middlegame plan and endgame conversion.
Would you like a tailored micro-repertoire and a 2-week puzzle/strategy plan?
If yes, tell me your preferred time per day for study and any openings you especially enjoy or dislike. I’ll generate a concise, mobile-friendly plan with specific moves to study, targeted puzzle sets, and a short game review routine.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nocturnus_xiii | 1W / 1L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| avelinofernandes | 61W / 44L / 10D | |
| Ednasia Júnior | 97W / 10L / 4D | |
| marciofilipe | 48W / 37L / 5D | |
| Manuel Alberto Alberto | 40W / 32L / 11D | |
| David Silva | 30W / 29L / 17D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2509 | 2580 | ||
| 2024 | 2462 | 2508 | 326 | |
| 2023 | 2361 | 2460 | 326 | |
| 2022 | 2218 | |||
| 2021 | 2114 | 2056 | ||
| 2020 | 1995 | 2090 | 1677 | |
| 2019 | 364 | 2058 | ||
| 2018 | 577 | 1814 | ||
| 2017 | 931 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 112W / 82L / 27D | 108W / 110L / 11D | 87.5 |
| 2024 | 79W / 57L / 13D | 66W / 68L / 14D | 89.6 |
| 2023 | 71W / 53L / 9D | 76W / 54L / 10D | 79.9 |
| 2022 | 12W / 6L / 0D | 10W / 6L / 1D | 72.6 |
| 2021 | 35W / 10L / 5D | 24W / 16L / 4D | 78.5 |
| 2020 | 663W / 218L / 77D | 643W / 241L / 72D | 68.6 |
| 2019 | 158W / 141L / 16D | 148W / 150L / 17D | 73.1 |
| 2018 | 60W / 30L / 3D | 56W / 28L / 10D | 67.5 |
| 2017 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 39.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 494 | 286 | 173 | 35 | 57.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 134 | 109 | 21 | 4 | 81.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 111 | 71 | 30 | 10 | 64.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 107 | 78 | 22 | 7 | 72.9% |
| Czech Defense | 102 | 54 | 42 | 6 | 52.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 99 | 66 | 25 | 8 | 66.7% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 96 | 63 | 25 | 8 | 65.6% |
| French Defense | 85 | 52 | 32 | 1 | 61.2% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 84 | 43 | 32 | 9 | 51.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 83 | 53 | 25 | 5 | 63.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 65 | 28 | 33 | 4 | 43.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 36 | 20 | 13 | 3 | 55.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 21 | 13 | 7 | 1 | 61.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 76.5% |
| Australian Defense | 17 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 52.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Döry Defense | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 14 | 5 | 7 | 2 | 35.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 11 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 36.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Guimard Defense, Main Line | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |