Profile Summary: G S (doyen17)
Meet G S, a chess tactician with the prestigious title of FIDE Master. With a flair for the blitz, G S has danced across the 64 squares from a humble 1329 Blitz rating in 2013 to an impressive peak beyond 2350! They are not one to shy away from fast and furious bullet matches either, flirting with ratings over 2200, proving lightning reflexes and sharp calculation skills.
Known for an early resignation rate under 5%, G S shows patience and determination, fighting through endgames a whopping 85% of the time and averaging a marathon of over 70 moves per win! If you capture a piece off-guard, beware: their comeback rate (~87%) is like a thriller novel, capped with a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece. Morale is key, and G S doesn’t tilt often, keeping a cool head with a tilt factor of just 8.
G S’s opening repertoire is "Top Secret," but their results speak volumes: a consistent ~52% win rate in blitz, almost 60% rapid, and 50% bullet wins, dominating on all fronts with a bias for aggressive but sound play. Their White pieces seem lucky, boasting a 54% win rate versus 50% with Black, showing solid fundamentals and a knack for seizing initiative.
Some quirky trivia: G S’s winning streaks hit 9 games straight at their best, and right now is cruising with a nice 3-win streak. They laugh in the face of opponent "handy74" who has yet to score against them (0% win rate) but have shown mercy to "bolkian" with just a 40% win rate—after all, everyone needs a worthy rival.
Apart from numbers, G S embodies the spirit of chess with steadiness and a hint of cheek. Whether squeezing wins in slow strategic battles or blitzing out fearless attacks, G S keeps fans and foes alike guessing and entertained. Opponents beware: this master’s game is no joke, but a legendary ride on chess's rollercoaster!
Hi G S – here’s some tailored feedback to accelerate your improvement
• Current form: your tactical awareness is sharp (many wins decided by direct attacks), but several losses are due to
time pressure and technical end-game slips.
• Highlight stat: 2351 (2024-05-03)
• Recent activity graphs:
1. Opening repertoire & first-move choices
- With White you often play 1.e4 and steer into aggressive lines such as the King’s Gambit and Grand Prix Attack. That suits your tactical style, but be mindful of overextending pawns too early – e.g. pushing f and h pawns simultaneously can leave holes on e3/e4.
- With Black you rely on Scandinavian & Caro-Kann structures. These are solid, yet several opponents reached pleasant end-games because you delayed development of the light-squared bishop. Aim to castle by move 10 whenever possible.
- Spend one study session on anti-gambit coverage: learn a clean system versus the Smith-Morra or King’s Gambit Accepted so you feel comfortable declining or returning the pawn.
2. Middlegame decision-making
Your strength is spotting forcing sequences; your weakness is prophylaxis (Prophylaxis). Try asking “what does my opponent want?” before every move.
Illustrative example (recent win vs grandchief0208):
[[Pgn|[Event "Live Chess"] [Site "Chess.com"] [Date "2025.05.01"] [White "grandchief0208"] [Black "doyen17"] [Result "0-1"] ... 15. Qe2 O-O-O 16. Nb3 Qe3 17. Rae1 Qxe2 18. Rxe2 h5 19. Nd4 Rdf8 20. Bf5 Kd7 21. Bxg4 Bxg4 22. Rd2 h4! ...]]- Move 14…Ng4! was thematic – you hit f2 and lure pieces onto awkward squares.
- After 19…Rdf8 you coordinated rooks before pawn-storming – good model of piece first, pawns second.
- Room for improvement: on move 25 you grabbed the e-pawn but allowed 27.Rfd4 with counterplay. Look for quiet improving moves before snatching material.
3. Endgame technique
- Several games ended in rook + pawn structures where you had the advantage but let the clock decide. Review the basic winning methods: the Lucena and Philidor positions (Lucena Position, Philidor Position).
- Practise converting an extra passer against engine defence for 10 minutes each day. This will build automatic technique so time trouble hurts less.
4. Clock handling
You lost 6 of the last 10 defeats on time in equal or better positions. Practical tips:
- Adopt a “minimum move” policy: every 5 moves, force yourself to make one move within 5 seconds to keep the flow.
- Aim to reach move 20 with >50 % of your starting time by using your opening notes and playing familiar structures.
- When ahead materially, simplify instead of calculating forcing mates – this saves precious seconds.
5. Typical stumbling blocks
- Pawn grabs without calculation – see loss vs englishelf where 23…Rcd8 was fine but you chose the greedier 23…Rcd8 leading to counterplay.
- Ignoring attackers on the long diagonal (e.g. bishop on g7/b2). Place a mental stop sign whenever both queens are on the board and a diagonal is opened.
- Exchange sacs on d5/f5 – opponents have hurt you with the thematic exchange sacrifice. Review classic games by Tal to recognise danger signals.
6. 4-week actionable plan
| Week | Main focus | Daily micro-task (15 min) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Opening clean-up | Update PGN repertoire; play 3 blitz games testing new Scandinavian line |
| 2 | Middlegame prophylaxis | Annotate 1 GM game & write down opponent threats on each move |
| 3 | Rook endgames | Finish 20 positions from “100 Endgames You Must Know” |
| 4 | Time-management drill | Play 10 games of 3|2 with the rule “never below 30 s after move 20” |
7. Final encouragement
Your tactical eye already matches 2300-level opposition; polishing opening efficiency and end-game conversion will push your rating another 150-200 points. Stick to the plan, review each session, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Borodetoro | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| chemmen | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sergiobrabr | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| royalhavoc | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| bruzkyninam | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| uintoverflow | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| percywu | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| luca_bertaglia | 15W / 8L / 2D | |
| jocapacersah | 14W / 6L / 2D | |
| cmobslchess | 12W / 4L / 2D | |
| redbeard17eg | 11W / 6L / 0D | |
| Bruscato | 10W / 5L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2117 | 2321 | ||
| 2024 | 2277 | 2254 | ||
| 2023 | 2117 | 2301 | 2152 | |
| 2022 | 2156 | 2120 | ||
| 2021 | 2181 | 2205 | 2180 | |
| 2020 | 2005 | 2305 | 2200 | |
| 2019 | 2200 | |||
| 2018 | 2140 | |||
| 2017 | 2050 | |||
| 2016 | 2130 | |||
| 2015 | 1924 | |||
| 2014 | 1945 | |||
| 2013 | 1827 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 59W / 38L / 3D | 54W / 40L / 3D | 75.1 |
| 2024 | 87W / 54L / 17D | 83W / 58L / 16D | 78.2 |
| 2023 | 181W / 123L / 28D | 166W / 134L / 33D | 83.3 |
| 2022 | 245W / 174L / 35D | 217W / 198L / 42D | 82.1 |
| 2021 | 240W / 190L / 33D | 225W / 191L / 36D | 80.7 |
| 2020 | 167W / 125L / 22D | 158W / 143L / 22D | 80.1 |
| 2019 | 62W / 34L / 5D | 59W / 41L / 7D | 82.3 |
| 2018 | 53W / 35L / 7D | 46W / 35L / 8D | 77.5 |
| 2017 | 62W / 45L / 5D | 51W / 60L / 8D | 81.5 |
| 2016 | 17W / 7L / 0D | 17W / 8L / 0D | 67.8 |
| 2015 | 6W / 4L / 0D | 4W / 4L / 0D | 75.2 |
| 2014 | 44W / 33L / 6D | 48W / 30L / 8D | 77.7 |
| 2013 | 41W / 21L / 2D | 37W / 23L / 3D | 77.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 466 | 233 | 190 | 43 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 195 | 119 | 63 | 13 | 61.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 186 | 100 | 77 | 9 | 53.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 166 | 81 | 69 | 16 | 48.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 159 | 75 | 69 | 15 | 47.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 139 | 85 | 48 | 6 | 61.1% |
| Modern | 126 | 66 | 54 | 6 | 52.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 124 | 64 | 54 | 6 | 51.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 123 | 66 | 51 | 6 | 53.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 115 | 55 | 54 | 6 | 47.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 65.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |