Overview
David Pruess is an International Master (IM) recognized by FIDE and a well-known chess streamer. He brings high‑level insight to his audience with a refreshingly fun and occasionally mischievous approach. His preferred time control is Blitz, where fast tactical feel and practical decision‑making shine.
Streaming and Community
On stream he shares live games, annotated thought processes, and entertaining commentary that makes complex ideas feel approachable. He engages with viewers, explains openings in real time, and occasionally jokes about his own missteps. For more on his profile, check David Pruess.
Opening Style and Blitz Approach
In Blitz, Pruess has explored a broad repertoire that favors sharp, dynamic lines. Notable Blitz choices include the Caro‑Kann Defense, various Sicilian lines (including Najdorf and Closed), the Amar Gambit family, and aggressive setups like the Amazon Attack. His style blends solid structure with tactical willingness, often translating quick decisions into practical pressure on opponents.
- Caro‑Kann Defense — resilient and solid with counterattack chances
- Sicilian Defense (Najdorf/Closed) — sharp, tactical battles
- Amar Gambit and related lines — aggressive, imbalanced play
- Amazon Attack and Siberian Attack families — aggressive, dynamic play
- KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 — development-focused control
Notable Milestones
David has demonstrated exceptional staying power across time controls, including a remarkable 66‑game winning streak and a long, fruitful run across Bullet, Blitz, and Rapid events. His peak Blitz rating reached 2569 in 2021, and he has also posted strong results in Daily and Rapid formats.
His peak Blitz performance is highlighted here: 2569 (2021-06-25).Profile
Discover more about his career and connect with his content through his profile: David Pruess.
Overview of Recent Performance
David, you have been showing consistent improvement in your blitz games over the past months. Your rating trend slopes and rating changes indicate a positive upward trajectory, with a notable 81-point increase over six months and steady gains more recently. Your strength adjusted win rate stands just under 50%, reflecting balanced performance against opponents of varying skill levels.
Analysis of Recent Wins
Reviewing your most recent victories provides insight into your effective strategies:
- Strong opening knowledge: You demonstrate solid handling of openings like the French Defense Knight Variation and Queen's Gambit Declined, securing good positions early in the games.
- Decisive middle game attacks: In several games, you effectively leverage tactical opportunities and good piece coordination, such as the checkmate achieved with a well-timed bishop move in one scenario.
- Endgame technique: The ability to convert material advantage and maintain pressure until the opponent resigns or times out shows strong endgame awareness.
Continue reinforcing these strengths by studying game themes in your favored openings and practicing tactics to sharpen decision-making in the middle and endgame.
Constructive Feedback on Recent Losses
Looking at the losses, there are a few areas to focus on that could help you increase your consistency:
- Time management: Some games ended on time even when you held reasonable positions. Prioritize keeping an eye on the clock, especially in blitz, to avoid losing on time.
- Opening challenges: In a few losses, opponents gained early initiative in sharp lines of the Sicilian Defense, such as the Canal Attack. Review these lines to better navigate or choose alternative setups if uncomfortable.
- Positional Awareness: Maintaining control of key squares and avoiding passive positions could reduce risks of losing material or conceding decisive attacks.
Incorporate focused opening study and practice speed management drills to mitigate these issues.
Next Steps for Improvement
- Analyze typical middle game themes arising from your main openings to deepen understanding.
- Practice rapid tactical puzzles daily to improve calculation speed and pattern recognition.
- Review critical moments in your losses to identify tactical oversights or strategic inaccuracies.
- Explore time management techniques in blitz to balance speed and accuracy.
- Consider varying your openings slightly to keep opponents guessing and find lines best suited to your style.
Your positive rating trends show that your efforts are paying off. Keep building on your strengths and addressing these focus areas to continue climbing the rating ladder.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Brave-Idol | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| lucomighty | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Chaoruo Cai | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sanslimite | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| uastrong | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Zvonko Stanojoski | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| vmezentsev | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| arrydan | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| thebishoppairisgreat | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| fischifroschi | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kostya Kavutskiy | 46W / 45L / 46D | |
| Kairav Joshi | 84W / 30L / 2D | |
| Daniel Rensch | 44W / 49L / 13D | |
| tyfweys | 62W / 9L / 3D | |
| kuldeep shanker | 51W / 8L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2257 | 2611 | 2300 | 400 |
| 2024 | 2445 | 2300 | ||
| 2023 | 2249 | 2311 | 2222 | |
| 2022 | 2248 | 2436 | 2140 | |
| 2021 | 2328 | 2346 | 2096 | |
| 2020 | 2355 | 2357 | 2162 | |
| 2019 | 2033 | 2289 | 2205 | |
| 2018 | 2202 | |||
| 2017 | 2060 | 2323 | ||
| 2016 | 2225 | 2214 | ||
| 2015 | 2189 | 2233 | ||
| 2014 | 2189 | 1733 | ||
| 2013 | 2134 | 2074 | 2509 | |
| 2012 | 2135 | 2118 | 1733 | 2509 |
| 2011 | 2289 | 2230 | 1200 | |
| 2010 | 2404 | 2080 | 1200 | 2507 |
| 2009 | 2200 | 2005 | 1755 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 118W / 61L / 14D | 109W / 64L / 15D | 72.4 |
| 2024 | 132W / 88L / 13D | 128W / 96L / 10D | 70.2 |
| 2023 | 181W / 130L / 40D | 160W / 146L / 34D | 69.6 |
| 2022 | 315W / 199L / 24D | 252W / 223L / 46D | 68.9 |
| 2021 | 211W / 152L / 30D | 223W / 136L / 21D | 53.9 |
| 2020 | 414W / 270L / 22D | 363W / 300L / 40D | 67.4 |
| 2019 | 232W / 140L / 13D | 195W / 173L / 14D | 65.9 |
| 2018 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 2L / 0D | 40.3 |
| 2017 | 22W / 6L / 1D | 15W / 8L / 2D | 65.9 |
| 2016 | 72W / 38L / 3D | 82W / 35L / 1D | 63.7 |
| 2015 | 14W / 4L / 1D | 14W / 2L / 1D | 47.6 |
| 2014 | 68W / 31L / 4D | 76W / 24L / 3D | 68.3 |
| 2013 | 113W / 24L / 2D | 105W / 26L / 5D | 61.5 |
| 2012 | 209W / 93L / 16D | 191W / 116L / 15D | 65.9 |
| 2011 | 832W / 114L / 13D | 806W / 123L / 28D | 61.4 |
| 2010 | 203W / 11L / 9D | 212W / 28L / 5D | 55.4 |
| 2009 | 24W / 2L / 0D | 29W / 0L / 0D | 49.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 270 | 196 | 67 | 7 | 72.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 123 | 91 | 30 | 2 | 74.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 121 | 86 | 31 | 4 | 71.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 109 | 74 | 34 | 1 | 67.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 106 | 71 | 31 | 4 | 67.0% |
| Modern | 90 | 70 | 17 | 3 | 77.8% |
| Czech Defense | 87 | 59 | 24 | 4 | 67.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 87 | 48 | 36 | 3 | 55.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 86 | 64 | 21 | 1 | 74.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 86 | 60 | 25 | 1 | 69.8% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 289 | 189 | 88 | 12 | 65.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 171 | 105 | 55 | 11 | 61.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 170 | 101 | 63 | 6 | 59.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 129 | 83 | 45 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 117 | 71 | 36 | 10 | 60.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 98 | 77 | 19 | 2 | 78.6% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 90 | 62 | 27 | 1 | 68.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 89 | 53 | 32 | 4 | 59.5% |
| Döry Defense | 87 | 46 | 34 | 7 | 52.9% |
| Czech Defense | 85 | 51 | 30 | 4 | 60.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Opening* | 96 | 35 | 20 | 41 | 36.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 25 | 13 | 5 | 7 | 52.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 8 | 4 | 3 | 53.3% |
| Bird Opening | 14 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 28.6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 72.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 28.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 66 | 1 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |