Player Biography: dzhang24143
Meet dzhang24143, a chess warrior whose journey is as dynamic as a well-fought Sicilian Defense. Starting from humble beginnings with a bullet rating around 838 in April 2020, dzhang24143's resilience and tactical prowess pushed their rating to an impressive peak of 1439 by April 2021. Not bad for someone who clearly loves the adrenaline rush of bullet games!
With a peak blitz rating of 1175 and a rapid strength reaching up to 1417, they've shown versatility across time controls — a true all-rounder. Daily chess? Absolutely! They even cracked a daily max rating of 1034 in 2023, proving that slow and steady sometimes does win the race.
Their favorite openings read like a greatest hits list of classical chess: the Three Knights Opening, King's Pawn, and the Four Knights Game all make regular appearances in their repertoire. A particular fan of the Four Knights Scotch Variation, dzhang24143's results show a winning tilt in these sharp, tactical lines.
When bitten by the tactical bug, they respond with a nearly 80% comeback rate after losing material—and a solid 44% win rate even after losing a piece. It’s clear this player never says die, unless, of course, it’s time for an early resignation, which happens about 6% of the time (because who wants to suffer needlessly?).
While dzhang24143’s win rate against higher-rated players sits around 29%, they’ve mastered the art of capitalizing on underdog status with a smashing 66% win rate when preferred by the rating odds. With an average of about 62 moves per win and a slightly lower move count for losses, this player enjoys grinding out full-length battles filled with strategy and suspense.
The psychological stats tell a fun story as well — a tilt factor of 28 and their best time to strike is at 9:00 AM, a fine hour for unraveling opponents’ defenses before morning coffee fades. Opponents beware: dzhang24143 doesn’t just play chess, they play the mind games too.
Their latest victory is a textbook demonstration of technique in the Caro-Kann Defense, Two Knights Mindeno Variation, winning via checkmate after 65 intense moves. Talk about stamina and style!
Off the battlefield, dzhang24143 can be found battling familiar foes like "rasfos" and "brusewayne," with some opponents tolerated more than others — a few even seem to never escape without a loss.
In short, whether blitzing at breakneck speeds, rapidly calculating middle-game tactics, or patiently plotting in daily games, dzhang24143 embodies the spirit of determination, the thrill of chess, and the occasional graceful surrender. With a nickname like that, they probably just want to keep surprising us all. Keep your kings guarded—you never know when dzhang24143 will strike next!
Overview of your recent results
You have 6 wins and 4 losses with no draws across the tracked games. Your rating history shows a positive trend recently, with 1‑month and 6‑month changes indicating growth. This suggests you are building momentum and gaining practical experience from a mix of openings and middlegame plans.
What you’re doing well
- Opening versatility: You played a variety of openings and still managed to win several games. This shows you can adapt to different setups and keep opponents off balance.
- Endgame resilience: You have long, fighting games that end in decisive play. This demonstrates stamina and persistence, and your ability to push for winning chances even in complex positions.
- Positive rating trend: The rating changes over 1, 3, 6, and 12 months point toward steady improvement. Your recent performances indicate your study is paying off.
- Good execution in tactical moments: In several games you converted advantages into concrete win chances, including successful piece activity and coordinated attacks.
Areas to improve
- Endgame planning and simplification: When ahead or in complex endings, practice deciding when to simplify and when to press. Having a simple, repeatable endgame plan helps convert advantages more reliably.
- Time management and pacing: In some games, there were long manoeuvres that could drain the clock. Work on quick, solid decision-making in the middlegame and keep a clock-aware routine during critical moments.
- Consistency in middlegame transitions: After obtaining opening-based advantages, focus on converting them into tangible middlegame plans (create a clear goal, like press on a weak pawn, or exploit a kingside minority) rather than drifting into passive maneuvers.
- Tactical pattern recognition: Regular, short puzzles (10–15 minutes daily) can help you spot motifs you encounter in your games, reducing overthinking in sharp positions.
Openings performance—what to take away
The openings data shows solid results across several systems, but the sample size for each line is small. Treat these as a starting point to guide study rather than final judgments. Consider committing to 2–3 openings to deepen your repertoire while keeping a flexible attitude for other lines.
- Strong early results in a Modern Defense line, the Petrov, and several English/Four Knights variants suggest these setups suit your style of piece activity and solid structure.
- Some lines show less success, which can be due to the limited number of games. Use them as targets for study, not fixed conclusions.
- Actionable plan: pick two openings you enjoy and study them in depth (typical plans, common middle-game structures, and typical pawn breaks). For the rest, prepare a basic awareness (what to look for on the first 10 moves) so you can choose confidently in the moment.
Training plan to accelerate improvement (next 4 weeks)
- Endgames (Week 1): Practice rook endings and king + rook vs king + rook endings. Focus on simple rule sets (when to activate the king, when to trade rooks, how to create winning pawn pushes).
- Middlegame planning (Week 2): After the opening phase, work on identifying a clear plan in the middlegame (target a weak pawn, exploit a pawn majority, improve piece activity). Use two concise example games per study session to reinforce the ideas.
- Tactics and pattern recognition (Week 3): 15–20 minutes of puzzles daily, focusing on common motifs seen in your games (pins, skewers, trades leading to favorable endgames, and tactical shot sequences).
- Opening deep dive (Week 4): Pick two openings you enjoy most and build a simple repertoire cheat sheet with typical middlegame plans, common pawn structures, and typical endgames arising from that line.
Next steps and quick drills
- Do a weekly 1‑hour review of your last 3–4 games: note turning points, missed opportunities, and moves you hesitated on. Write down a single improvement you will try in the next game.
- In each game, consciously decide on a plan within the first 10 moves: is the goal to control the center, to provoke weaknesses, or to activate a particular piece?
- Keep playing diverse openings but record a short "repertoire card" for your top two choices, including your go-to responses to common replies.
- Consider sharing a PGN of a recent game for targeted feedback on specific moments (e.g., a critical middlegame transition or a late tactic).
Profile and progress
For a quick link to your profile, you can view your recent games and update notes here: dzhang24143
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| papyff | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| murodbek_77 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| m7ankit | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| neurosurgeon41 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| arsenjq | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| yonacanizer | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| marvinosr | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sharkofbayst | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| prashant1x | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| jaf_mendieta | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| avaneeshp14 | 171W / 276L / 22D | View Games |
| crudeness | 39W / 83L / 4D | View Games |
| ergnedstrgfw | 31W / 91L / 0D | View Games |
| Carissa Yip | 18W / 101L / 0D | View Games |
| slimyopera | 64W / 15L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1432 | 1019 | 1396 | 1097 |
| 2024 | 599 | 1024 | ||
| 2023 | 845 | 892 | 1239 | 1034 |
| 2022 | 1010 | 769 | 1100 | |
| 2021 | 1070 | 1133 | 1090 | |
| 2020 | 1032 | 900 | 1095 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 629W / 548L / 37D | 593W / 576L / 50D | 64.3 |
| 2024 | 115W / 119L / 5D | 111W / 125L / 2D | 51.0 |
| 2023 | 552W / 585L / 36D | 506W / 617L / 46D | 59.6 |
| 2022 | 16W / 41L / 1D | 20W / 37L / 1D | 56.1 |
| 2021 | 933W / 835L / 83D | 816W / 953L / 73D | 63.7 |
| 2020 | 744W / 716L / 72D | 714W / 763L / 53D | 58.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 127 | 64 | 53 | 10 | 50.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 83 | 39 | 40 | 4 | 47.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 69 | 37 | 26 | 6 | 53.6% |
| Scotch Game | 62 | 21 | 38 | 3 | 33.9% |
| Four Knights Game | 62 | 37 | 24 | 1 | 59.7% |
| Three Knights Opening | 56 | 32 | 23 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 54 | 28 | 21 | 5 | 51.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 45 | 20 | 22 | 3 | 44.4% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 43 | 19 | 22 | 2 | 44.2% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 39 | 21 | 14 | 4 | 53.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 585 | 286 | 273 | 26 | 48.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 485 | 232 | 241 | 12 | 47.8% |
| Four Knights Game | 436 | 229 | 187 | 20 | 52.5% |
| Three Knights Opening | 330 | 164 | 156 | 10 | 49.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 279 | 137 | 131 | 11 | 49.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 262 | 111 | 146 | 5 | 42.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 249 | 105 | 140 | 4 | 42.2% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 247 | 122 | 117 | 8 | 49.4% |
| Scotch Game | 245 | 105 | 129 | 11 | 42.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 228 | 121 | 102 | 5 | 53.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 256 | 112 | 143 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 181 | 85 | 88 | 8 | 47.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 176 | 82 | 81 | 13 | 46.6% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 163 | 80 | 79 | 4 | 49.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 161 | 78 | 76 | 7 | 48.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 152 | 71 | 70 | 11 | 46.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 128 | 58 | 64 | 6 | 45.3% |
| Scotch Game | 118 | 50 | 58 | 10 | 42.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 102 | 55 | 43 | 4 | 53.9% |
| Three Knights Opening | 93 | 53 | 36 | 4 | 57.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 29 | 1 |
| Losing | 28 | 0 |