ekurtz – The Evolving Chess Virtuoso
Emerging on the chess scene with a steady climb in performance and confidence, ekurtz has developed into a remarkably versatile player. His journey is best told through the evolution of his ratings – beginning with modest blitz and bullet scores in 2016 and steadily rising into the 2800s over the next few years. Whether it is in blitz, rapid, or bullet formats, his improvement mirrors his dedication, deep preparation and relentless practice.
ekurtz’s style on the board combines tactical brilliance with a strategic sense that often sees him excel in long, complex endgames. With an endgame frequency exceeding 82%, he knows how to navigate the later phases of the game, turning small advantages into victories. His statistical record is as impressive as it is telling: boasting a comeback rate of over 92% and a staggering 99% win rate even in situations where he is down a piece, ekurtz has proven himself exceptionally resilient and resourceful.
Beyond his raw tactical abilities, ekurtz also shows distinct psychological strength. With a relatively low “Tilt Factor” and only a small difference between his rated and casual win percentages, he maintains focus and composure when the pressure mounts. His performance varies slightly over the day – peaking during key hours – yet his overall consistency reflects a well–balanced mind and a disciplined approach to every game.
His deep opening preparation, with notable performances in classical lines such as the Pirc Defense, English Opening variations, and even the dynamic King’s Indian Defense, highlights a player who studies traditional ideas while remaining flexible enough to adapt to modern trends. This answerable blend of knowledge and intuition has allowed ekurtz to craft a unique brand of chess that continues to grow year after year.
Today, as his blitz rating nears the 2800 mark and his rapid and bullet games reflect similar upward trends, ekurtz stands as a testament to what perseverance, continuous learning, and psychological fortitude can achieve on the chessboard. A student of the game and a fierce competitor alike, he continues to refine his style – always aiming higher, always looking for that next breakthrough.
Overall Performance Highlights
Eric, your recent games continue to demonstrate a strong understanding of the English Opening and Pirc Defense structures, reflected in your solid win rate hovering around 49.9% adjusted for opponent strength. Your rating gains over the last 1, 3, and 6 months indicate consistent improvement, with positive trend slopes particularly strong over 3 months. This steady progress is excellent for maintaining and growing your skill level in blitz games.
What You Are Doing Well
- Opening Choice Consistency: You have a clear preference for the English Opening and its various lines such as the Agincourt Defense and the Symmetrical Variation, which you handle confidently with win rates near or above 48%. This specialization helps you capitalize on your preparation.
- Endgame Technique: Your recent win by checkmate after maneuvering a complex position shows your ability to convert advantages effectively. Staying calm in tactical or endgame moments is a key strength in blitz chess.
- Strategic Flexibility: You’ve demonstrated good adaptability in reactive plans, such as effectively managing pawn structures and repositioning knights and bishops to create pressure, especially in the Neo-Catalan and Pirc Defense setups.
- Time Management: In critical positions, your clock usage is balanced, allowing you to make quality decisions without severe time pressure, which is vital in blitz formats.
Areas for Improvement
- Defending Complex Positions: In your losses, there were moments when opponents successfully exploited weaknesses on the queenside or central tension. Studying common defensive techniques in these openings can help you hold difficult positions longer and avoid early resignations.
- Opening Variability: Although your preferred openings have solid performance, introducing slight variations or secondary lines could reduce predictability, potentially improving your results against well-prepared opponents.
- Countering Aggressive Plans: A few losses showed trouble dealing with active opponent pawn breaks or piece sacrifices early in the middlegame. Focused practice on handling aggressive setups, especially in the English Opening and Pirc Defense, could enhance your defensive resilience.
- Transition to Endgames: Some games ended in difficult endgame positions where resourceful opponent play prevailed. Working on common endgame motifs arising from your favorite openings will improve your chances of securing draws or wins in tight scenarios.
Recommendations for Next Steps
- Dive deeper into English Opening: Neo-Catalan and Pirc Defense middlegame plans, focusing on typical pawn structures and tactical themes encountered in blitz.
- Analyze your lost games to identify recurring tactical oversights or strategic slips, perhaps by reviewing key moments where the position shifted against you.
- Incorporate endgame training for positions common after the English Opening and Pirc Defense, especially rook and minor piece endings.
- Experiment with slightly different move orders or secondary variations to keep your opponents guessing and build a broader opening repertoire.
- Maintain your steady rating improvement by continuing regular practice and reviewing both your wins and losses critically.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alan Stein | 116W / 124L / 15D | View Games |
| Lucas Do Valle Cardoso | 70W / 91L / 13D | View Games |
| Nathan White | 79W / 67L / 9D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 61W / 72L / 7D | View Games |
| Aman Hambleton | 14W / 112L / 8D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2548 | 2903 | 2372 | |
| 2024 | 2423 | 2807 | 2538 | 1737 |
| 2023 | 2345 | 2775 | 2366 | |
| 2022 | 2305 | 2706 | 2360 | |
| 2021 | 2402 | 2703 | 2304 | |
| 2020 | 2412 | 2649 | 2148 | |
| 2019 | 2225 | 2616 | 2032 | |
| 2018 | 2193 | 2404 | 1987 | |
| 2017 | 2226 | 2403 | 1812 | 1587 |
| 2016 | 2081 | 1913 | 1849 | 1587 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1653W / 1575L / 229D | 1506W / 1684L / 266D | 87.3 |
| 2024 | 1087W / 1056L / 180D | 968W / 1186L / 171D | 87.7 |
| 2023 | 686W / 662L / 105D | 579W / 771L / 98D | 86.6 |
| 2022 | 54W / 49L / 6D | 37W / 60L / 5D | 81.6 |
| 2021 | 1838W / 1535L / 262D | 1626W / 1774L / 242D | 87.9 |
| 2020 | 2063W / 1892L / 288D | 1818W / 2212L / 232D | 85.2 |
| 2019 | 1398W / 1329L / 165D | 1233W / 1489L / 139D | 83.2 |
| 2018 | 2326W / 2060L / 188D | 2127W / 2265L / 207D | 82.1 |
| 2017 | 842W / 736L / 74D | 833W / 823L / 54D | 77.2 |
| 2016 | 546W / 469L / 37D | 491W / 543L / 33D | 69.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 6343 | 2923 | 3121 | 299 | 46.1% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 3433 | 1676 | 1532 | 225 | 48.8% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2906 | 1377 | 1363 | 166 | 47.4% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 2621 | 1312 | 1128 | 181 | 50.1% |
| English Opening | 2473 | 1196 | 1118 | 159 | 48.4% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 2279 | 994 | 1142 | 143 | 43.6% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 2107 | 1013 | 958 | 136 | 48.1% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 2048 | 1009 | 917 | 122 | 49.3% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 1751 | 789 | 858 | 104 | 45.1% |
| Benko Gambit | 1604 | 725 | 809 | 70 | 45.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 467 | 214 | 208 | 45 | 45.8% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 202 | 106 | 82 | 14 | 52.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 197 | 96 | 89 | 12 | 48.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 165 | 96 | 57 | 12 | 58.2% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 163 | 70 | 81 | 12 | 42.9% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 150 | 73 | 64 | 13 | 48.7% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 106 | 53 | 41 | 12 | 50.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 98 | 53 | 38 | 7 | 54.1% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 98 | 55 | 33 | 10 | 56.1% |
| English Opening | 95 | 54 | 35 | 6 | 56.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 498 | 246 | 240 | 12 | 49.4% |
| Czech Defense | 291 | 140 | 137 | 14 | 48.1% |
| English Opening | 72 | 29 | 40 | 3 | 40.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 67 | 36 | 27 | 4 | 53.7% |
| Modern Defense | 63 | 32 | 30 | 1 | 50.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 53 | 21 | 28 | 4 | 39.6% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 39 | 24 | 13 | 2 | 61.5% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 38 | 25 | 13 | 0 | 65.8% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 37 | 16 | 20 | 1 | 43.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 30 | 12 | 17 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 21 | 3 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |