Robert Baskin - International Master Extraordinaire
Known in the digital arenas as elohunter1999, Robert Baskin isn’t your average chess player — they’re an International Master certified by none other than FIDE itself. Starting from humble beginnings with a blitz rating hovering around 1449 in 2014, Robert has rocketed through the ranks with the speed of a well-timed queen’s gambit, reaching a lightning-fast blitz peak of 2878 in 2021 and maintaining a fierce presence above 2700 ever since.
Playing Style & Strengths
Robert’s games are like epic sagas stretching on for nearly 80 moves on average — clearly savoring every strategic twist and tactical turn. Their endgame frequency stands at a hefty 83.5%, meaning they’re not one to shy away from the last battles on the board. With a comeback rate of over 91%, Baskin is the comeback kid of chess, often turning the tables even after losing a piece. In fact, their win rate after losing material is a spectacular 100% — a true testament to resilience (or maybe just pure calculation wizardry).
Preferred Formats and Ratings
- Blitz: Robert has played thousands of blitz games, boasting a win rate of just over 50% in their favorite “Top Secret” opening repertoire. Their blitz rating has surged from modest 1598 in 2014 all the way up to an astonishing 2764 in 2024.
- Bullet: A speed demon in bullet chess too, holding a solid 54.8% win rate with their sharp and secretive openings. Peak bullet rating clocks in at 2647.
- Rapid: While slightly less dominant in rapid, Robert still commands respect with over 44% wins and a peak rapid rating of 2400 in 2020.
Fun Facts & Quirks
Robert has an almost zen-like ability to handle tilt, keeping it relatively low at a factor of 8 — perfect for when those critical blunders sneak in. Also, don’t be fooled if they seemingly resign early once in a blue moon (only 1.4% early resignation rate); it’s probably a tactical master plan or maybe just grabbing a coffee. Notably, when playing as White, Baskin enjoys a 53% win rate, slightly outperforming their solid Black results.
Rivalries & Notable Opponents
Facing off against popular opponents like machinegunphilipp, Robert holds a respectable 65% win rate. However, some challengers get the better of him, like superchthonic and bobbyhanma, against whom he’s yet to score a victory. But puzzle-solving with puzzlebot_1294? A perfect 100%!
In Conclusion
Robert Baskin is a chess powerhouse with a blend of patience, tactical genius, and a dash of humor (if you listen closely during streams). From bullet bonfires to blitz marathons and rapid skirmishes, they continue to prove that chess is not just a game but an art form — often painted in victory, resilience, and the occasional quirky early concession.
Hi Robert!
Congratulations on breaking the 2700-blitz barrier (2878 (2021-02-09)) and for the high quality attacking games you have produced recently. Below is some personalised feedback based on your latest results.
Your biggest strengths
- Tactical alertness. Your win versus Danielian Elina shows razor-sharp calculation (19.Qxh5! and 22.Nd5! Nf6+ tactics). When complications arise you usually come out on top.
- Opening initiative. As White you consistently seize space with e4, d4, f4 ideas, and as Black you are comfortable in dynamic Sicilians and the French, taking the game to the opponent rather than waiting.
- Conversion under time pressure. Even with < 10 seconds you often find the forcing lines needed to finish the game, a clear sign of good pattern recognition.
Recurring issues to address
- Time management in the middle-game. Several recent losses (e.g. vs Alfonso Jose Alfaro Rojas) start with a solid position that drifts after you drop below one minute. Try adopting a “two-speed” clock policy: allocate ~45 s for the opening & early middlegame, reserve a second minute for the critical phase, and enter any endgame with at least 30 s.
- Over-repetition of plans. In three different games you repeated
B h6-f4-h6-f4vs the Sicilian. Opponents eventually exploited this predictable manoeuvre with …Qb6/Qh8 counters. Build a broader set of candidate moves (candidate moves) before committing to a piece shuffle. - End-game technique. Losses to BobbyHanma and Kemel Antonio Gallo García reveal hesitation in rook & minor-piece endings (e.g. hopeful h-pawn pushes that weakened your king). A weekly dose of theoretical endgames (Lucena, Philidor, rook vs pawn races) will pay quick dividends.
- Prophylaxis. A few defeats stem from ignoring the opponent’s next threat (…Qxb2, …Rxb2+, …Nxd2). Before every move ask “What is my opponent threatening?” (Prophylaxis check).
Action plan for the next 30 days
- Opening tune-up: Prepare a secondary line against 3…Nc6 Sicilians (e.g. the Alapin 2.c3 or 3.Bb5+). This prevents opponents from steering you into comfort zones they have prepped.
- Structured calculation drill: 15 min/day on mixed tactics, but force yourself to verbalise candidate moves & forcing lines to reduce impulsive swaps.
- Endgame mini-schedule:
• Mon/Wed – rook endings (Chessable or your favourite database)
• Fri – minor-piece vs pawns
• Weekend – play two 10 + 5 training games starting from an equal endgame position. - Review lost games immediately. Pick one critical position, set up on a board, and write down why your chosen move failed and what the engine recommends. Limiting the review to 10 minutes keeps it sustainable.
- Mental reset routine: After two consecutive losses, take a 5-minute break and perform a non-chess activity. This prevents tilt and protects your rating graph.
Your performance at a glance
Keep in mind
A 2700-level blitz player already knows a lot; the next leap often comes from avoiding self-inflicted errors rather than increasing brilliance. Tighten the screws in the areas above and you’ll see steady rating growth.
Good luck, have fun, and feel free to ping me with any questions after your next training cycle!
Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| machinegunphilipp | 75W / 37L / 3D | |
| Anselm Wagner | 18W / 9L / 1D | |
| bratkoo | 11W / 11L / 4D | |
| until-next-time | 14W / 9L / 0D | |
| Vinzent Spitzl | 15W / 4L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2695 | |||
| 2024 | 2614 | 2716 | ||
| 2023 | 2759 | |||
| 2022 | 2585 | 2624 | ||
| 2021 | 2607 | 2609 | 2106 | |
| 2020 | 2529 | 2678 | 2132 | |
| 2019 | 2116 | |||
| 2014 | 1598 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 2W / 3L / 0D | 74.8 |
| 2024 | 38W / 29L / 9D | 39W / 31L / 4D | 84.6 |
| 2023 | 17W / 9L / 1D | 17W / 12L / 3D | 85.9 |
| 2022 | 35W / 21L / 6D | 26W / 27L / 2D | 79.9 |
| 2021 | 183W / 127L / 33D | 170W / 129L / 37D | 86.8 |
| 2020 | 345W / 252L / 64D | 310W / 279L / 57D | 82.0 |
| 2019 | 11W / 7L / 0D | 13W / 4L / 1D | 61.5 |
| 2014 | 3W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 62.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 80 | 36 | 36 | 8 | 45.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 42 | 22 | 17 | 3 | 52.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 36 | 16 | 19 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 33 | 18 | 12 | 3 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 28 | 16 | 9 | 3 | 57.1% |
| Czech Defense | 28 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 27 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 40.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 25 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 23 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 69.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 44 | 28 | 15 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 43 | 31 | 7 | 5 | 72.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 27 | 17 | 7 | 3 | 63.0% |
| Czech Defense | 20 | 12 | 5 | 3 | 60.0% |
| French Defense | 18 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 72.2% |
| Modern | 18 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 18 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 17 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 47.1% |
| Australian Defense | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Classical Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Rubinstein System, Rubinstein Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 2 |