Enrica Zito (aka Enrica007)
Woman FIDE Master & Chess Enthusiast
Enrica Zito, proudly sporting the title of Woman FIDE Master, is no ordinary chess player. Known in the chess world by the username Enrica007, she’s been making tactical waves and stirring up sparkling combos on the 64 squares.
Since 2018, Enrica’s blitz rating skyrocketed from a modest ~1,000 to an impressive peak above 2,300 by 2024–2025, proving she's the queen of speed and precision. Her tactical awareness is nothing short of thrilling — with a comeback rate over 80% and an undefeated streak after losing a piece (100% win rate, no less!). Clearly, Enrica laughs in the face of adversity.
She’s a fierce competitor in blitz, bullet, rapid, and daily formats, though her rapid games appear to be a secret lair with just a few spikes to the 2,000+ mark. Enrica’s longest winning streak of 10 games shows she’s got both stamina and style — and her current streak continues to keep opponents on their toes.
Her endgame frequency is 65%, meaning if you make it past the wild opening dance, get ready for a strategic showdown — and with an average of 67 moves to win, patience is truly a virtue. Fun fact: she wins slightly more often with White (53%) but don’t underestimate her Black side, which holds strong at nearly 49%.
Enrica has faced a crowd of online challengers, demolishing many with 100% win rates against numerous opponents, while politely refusing others (0% win rate, no shame). She even manages a cheeky +16.67% win boost in rated games compared to casuals — proving when the chips are down, she brings her A-game.
When Enrica isn’t plotting checkmates, rumor has it she enjoys coffee, witty comebacks, and probably a little bit of chess trash talk. Watch out—behind that friendly username lies a formidable chess force that refuses to resign early (only 6.45% early resignations!), determined to see the game through.
In short, Enrica Zito is a rising star, a comeback queen, and undoubtedly your next tough opponent online. Beware the 007 in her handle—she’s licensed to win.
Hi Enrica, here’s a personalized performance review based on your latest blitz sessions.
What you’re already doing very well
- Active, principled openings: In both wins and losses you consistently grab space with 1.e4 and meet it with dynamic systems as Black (mostly Sicilians). Your move-orders are theory-sound up to move 10–12 in the majority of games—an important foundation at the 2300+ level.
- Tactical alertness: The victories over evergreen_elephant and rahul_narayanan show sharp combinations such as …Nb4-c2+ and …Qd3+ leading directly to mating nets. These examples confirm you calculate quickly and are not afraid to convert with forcing lines.
- Pressure management in equal endgames: When the position simplifies you frequently switch to practical winning tries instead of “agreeing” to a draw. The subtle rook manoeuvre in 37.b8=Q Bxa7 38.Qxa7 (vs respect444) is a good illustration.
- Peak performance window: Your hourly win-rate spikes between 14:30–15:30 UTC – keep building your session routine around that! ()
Recurring improvement themes
-
Time management in complicated middlegames
• Three of your four latest losses ended with <10 seconds on your clock.
• Practical tip: set a firm “no-think” quota for the first 15 moves (≈5 sec per move) to save 30-40 sec for the late middlegame scramble. -
King-safety when you go all-in on the kingside
Example (loss vs kreismyr – Caro-Kann Exchange): after 17.Nh7?! you sacrificed a knight but didn’t have pieces to keep the attack going, leaving your own king stuck in the centre.
• Before launching pawn storms ask “How many attackers vs defenders?” – if <3 attackers, reinforce first.
• Study model games in the Keres Attack and Sveshnikov to see balanced piece/pawn counts. -
Structural decisions in c3 Sicilians and French-type setups
• In the loss to elmartndebaha you exchanged on d4 and soon drifted into a worse endgame with an isolated e-pawn.
• Drill the typical pawn breaks …d6–d5 and …f6 in thematic puzzles; they convert space into activity without loosening the queenside. -
Endgame conversion vs stubborn defence
• Against Evergreen_Elephant you needed 70+ moves to convert a winning rook + extra pawn ending.
• Goal: cut that in half by rehearsing basic winning techniques (Lucena, Philidor) under <10 sec time handicap. A weekly 15-minute drill on rook + pawn vs rook will pay immediate dividends.
Concrete micro-goals for the next 30 games
| Target | How to measure |
|---|---|
| Spend <60 sec on first 15 moves | Track with the game clock |
| No blunders (-2 ⩽ eval drop) before move 20 | Engine post-game check |
| Reach 80 % success in rook + pawn drills | 5-minute Lichess studies / session |
Spotlight game
Review this phase with an engine and ask “Which safe improvement keeps the tension?”
Your current peak stats
Blitz peak: 2387 (2025-05-26)
Rapid peak: 2040 (2025-02-08)
Next steps
- Integrate 10-minute pattern recognition warm-ups (mates in 2, tactical shots) before each playing session.
- Play at least five games with a fixed queen’s-pawn repertoire as Black (e.g. Slav or QGD) to expand beyond the Sicilian/Caro - Kann comfort zone.
- Analyse one of your losses daily, annotating only the turning point move—this keeps study sessions focused and time-efficient.
Keep enjoying the grind and see you at the next milestone—2400 blitz!
Generated for Enrica Zito • last update based on games of 29-30 May 2025 •
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| marcoxb7 | 31W / 59L / 1D | |
| pietrozito | 53W / 21L / 0D | |
| matteochess5 | 5W / 0L / 0D | |
| 1234whats | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| burzujus | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1904 | 2033 | ||
| 2024 | 2027 | 2320 | ||
| 2021 | 1431 | 1872 | 760 | |
| 2020 | 1413 | 1668 | 760 | 1230 |
| 2019 | 1289 | 1487 | 760 | 1268 |
| 2018 | 1114 | 1038 | 1212 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 10W / 17L / 1D | 14W / 19L / 2D | 83.8 |
| 2024 | 48W / 36L / 4D | 47W / 39L / 4D | 79.0 |
| 2021 | 70W / 50L / 6D | 64W / 57L / 6D | 70.9 |
| 2020 | 24W / 26L / 1D | 18W / 30L / 1D | 58.2 |
| 2019 | 159W / 133L / 8D | 147W / 138L / 10D | 60.7 |
| 2018 | 23W / 22L / 0D | 16W / 22L / 0D | 48.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 62 | 27 | 31 | 4 | 43.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 53 | 22 | 30 | 1 | 41.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 49 | 27 | 22 | 0 | 55.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 45 | 26 | 17 | 2 | 57.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 45 | 32 | 13 | 0 | 71.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 38 | 25 | 13 | 0 | 65.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 34 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 33 | 26 | 7 | 0 | 78.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 28 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 26 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 11.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 9 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 3 |