Profile Summary: epicness77
Once upon a chessboard, epicness77 embarked on a journey from humble beginnings, with a Blitz rating barely scratching the 1100 mark in 2013. Over the years, this player has morphed from a casual pawn pusher into a formidable force across all time controls, reaching impressive ratings well over 2500 in Blitz and over 2400 in Bullet by 2025.
Rise Through the Ranks
What started as tentative moves and hopeful gambits quickly evolved into a steady ascent marked by fierce determination. Epicness77 is no stranger to blitz battles, accumulating over 40,000 games with a rich history of hard-fought wins and occasional (but humbling) losses. The Bullet rating narrative is equally impressive, climbing from the 800s to a dazzling peak above 2500—a thrilling rollercoaster of rapid-fire tactics and lightning reflexes.
Playing Style & Personality
A master of endurance, epicness77 often sees games out well into the 80-move mark, showcasing a patience akin to a zen master meditating on checkmate possibilities. The player’s proclivity for early resignations is surprisingly low (just 0.5%), because giving up is simply not in the script. Rather, this player thrives at endgame positions with a solid 82% endgame frequency, where true chess artistry unfolds.
Tactical awareness is second nature here; epicness77’s comeback rate is nearly 90%, bouncing back like a rubber ball from setbacks on the board with nearly flawless precision (win rate after losing a piece almost hits 100%). Some might call it resilience, others call it the stubborn spirit of a true chess warrior.
Psychology & Quirks
Even the stalwart epicness77 has moments of tilt, but with a tilt factor of just 16 (somewhere between a mildly annoyed rook and an actually furious knight), it’s clear that mental fortitude is strong. Curiously, rated games prove tougher, with a slight dip in win rate compared to casual, possibly attributable to the added pressure. But hey, even chess legends have their off days!
Notable Achievements & Records
- Longest winning streak: a blazing 27 games—now that's a hot streak!
- Win rates: Blending speed and precision, maintaining a steady win rate hovering around 45% in Blitz and rapidly improving across all formats.
- Opponent adventures: Faced thousands of opponents, including noted rivals and fresh challengers alike, always ready to engage with that battle-hardened chess grin.
When Does epicness77 Play?
Analysis shows a preference for evening battles (notably between 2am and 4am where the victory chances rise above 46%), and a slight edge playing on weekends when the chess gods apparently provide an extra dose of luck.
In Conclusion
epicness77 isn’t just a username—they are a story of growth, fierce competition, strategic brilliance, and relentless spirit. Whether blitzing through opponents with the hurry of a caffeine-fueled squirrel or grinding out endgames with contemplative patience, this player continues to carve a path of epicness across the 64 squares. Watch out world, epicness77 is making moves!
Feedback report for epicness77
Your current trajectory
• Peak blitz rating so far: 2555 (2025-02-13)
• Activity trend:
What you are doing well
- Tactical alertness. Games against ahmedbanbla1 and strateg75 (first encounter) show you can spot decisive combinations quickly. The miniature below is a good example:
- End-game technique. You converted the long Berlin end-game vs. strateg75 with solid king activity and accurate pawn play.
- Opening repertoire consistency. As White you stay loyal to 1.e4 and reach familiar Ruy-Lopez or French/Modern structures; as Black you answer 1.e4 with …e5 and frequently reach the Berlin or Rio lines—good for building deep knowledge.
Main improvement zones
-
Pawn pushes that weaken your king.
• In the loss vs. strateg75 you played …g6 and later …f6, leaving dark-square holes around your monarch.
• In the Modern Defence loss (vs. batist54) …f5 and …g5 accelerated your own downfall.
Action plan: Before advancing flank pawns ask “What squares become weak and can my opponent immediately occupy them?” – classic prophylaxis. Work through 5–10 master games where Black keeps the pawn chain intact in the Modern/Caro structures. -
Handling central tension in open games.
• In the Scotch (loss to isaachaley50) you allowed an early Qd6–Qd3 incursion because …d6 and …Nf6 were delayed.
• Against the French (loss to mati4333) you traded off the d4–e5 center too soon and Black’s …c5/…Rd8 seized the initiative.
Action plan: When you play 1…e5, drill the critical lines where White plays d4 or c3 early. With White, revisit classical French model games—note how strong players time d4–d5 and c4 breaks and avoid premature trades. -
Transition to winning end-games.
A few wins ended on time rather than by force (e.g. vs. flabbyroad). You were clearly better but still allowed counter-play (…c3 push). Strengthen your technique so victories come from conversion, not the clock.
Action plan: Practise against an engine from winning positions; force yourself to win with <30 seconds and increment—this trains both precision and clock handling. -
Resilience and early resignation.
Several defeats were resigned with material down but practical chances (e.g. vs. HeraclesCarvalho where opposite-colour bishops and outside passed “a”-pawn existed). Play on a bit longer; resourcefulness often flips blitz games.
Opening-specific suggestions
| Opening | Quick tip |
|---|---|
| Berlin / Rio as Black | Memorise the typical plan …h6 …Ne4 …Re8+ followed by …Nf5 in the 10.Re1 line—exactly the idea that scored in your first win. |
| Modern / Pirc as Black | Avoid early …f5/…g5 unless White is undeveloped. Study solid set-ups with …c6–…a6 or …e5 breaks instead. |
| French Classical as White | Review games by Botvinnik & Grischuk in the 7.Nf3 line; notice how they delay c4 until pieces are active and rook is on d1. |
Time-management checklist
- Allocate opening: 15-20 % of clock • middlegame: 60 % • conversion: remaining.
- Use opponent’s time to calculate forcing sequences; this cut your think time by ~15 % in the wins.
- When ahead on the board but down on time, simplify instead of hunting pawns.
Next steps for rapid improvement
1. Each week annotate one of your own losses without an engine, then compare to engine suggestions.
2. Solve 15 tactical puzzles/day focusing on defensive motifs—escape squares, interpositions, zwischenzug.
3. Play a training match (10 + 5) starting from the French game’s critical position after 21…Rxe6 and see if you can hold/convert against a sparring partner or engine.
Good luck and keep pushing your limits!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ahnaz84 | 7W / 18L / 1D | |
| gortoaj | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| louis64 | 4W / 4L / 1D | |
| ginseng0904 | 2W / 1L / 0D | |
| hieroja | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| mongooseme | 6W / 9L / 1D | |
| owner1995 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| turku2006 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| kuya-sam1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| nikin1994 | 3W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| germanmc | 679W / 878L / 160D | |
| lambdapi | 682W / 105L / 18D | |
| german_magnuscarlsen | 135W / 527L / 33D | |
| vn45638 | 237W / 12L / 7D | |
| ilikeumji | 44W / 176L / 26D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2415 | 2313 | 2348 | |
| 2024 | 2365 | 2415 | 2296 | 1670 |
| 2023 | 2213 | 2202 | 2098 | 1655 |
| 2022 | 2302 | 2206 | 2141 | 1653 |
| 2021 | 2086 | 2314 | 1945 | |
| 2020 | 1967 | 2101 | 1993 | 1708 |
| 2019 | 1802 | 1872 | 1590 | 1578 |
| 2018 | 1804 | 1929 | 1513 | |
| 2017 | 1850 | 1620 | 1490 | 1429 |
| 2016 | 1522 | 1572 | 1564 | 1339 |
| 2015 | 1331 | 1305 | 1515 | 1307 |
| 2014 | 868 | 1072 | 1335 | 1140 |
| 2013 | 905 | 1049 | 1248 | 957 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3097W / 3192L / 620D | 2855W / 3522L / 543D | 90.0 |
| 2024 | 2656W / 2788L / 477D | 2410W / 3052L / 451D | 89.5 |
| 2023 | 1691W / 1876L / 313D | 1481W / 2091L / 303D | 87.6 |
| 2022 | 2055W / 2141L / 394D | 1953W / 2295L / 327D | 85.9 |
| 2021 | 2914W / 3043L / 500D | 2751W / 3153L / 476D | 84.4 |
| 2020 | 1491W / 1370L / 199D | 1437W / 1454L / 189D | 80.6 |
| 2019 | 735W / 644L / 110D | 667W / 736L / 82D | 81.0 |
| 2018 | 578W / 482L / 67D | 519W / 545L / 66D | 78.2 |
| 2017 | 340W / 357L / 36D | 332W / 367L / 25D | 73.5 |
| 2016 | 417W / 432L / 65D | 421W / 442L / 51D | 73.9 |
| 2015 | 283W / 379L / 33D | 294W / 368L / 23D | 66.7 |
| 2014 | 82W / 107L / 9D | 81W / 117L / 4D | 63.0 |
| 2013 | 132W / 185L / 6D | 144W / 175L / 9D | 59.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3160 | 1339 | 1551 | 270 | 42.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 2203 | 1000 | 1074 | 129 | 45.4% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 2148 | 793 | 1111 | 244 | 36.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1964 | 880 | 950 | 134 | 44.8% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 1783 | 790 | 847 | 146 | 44.3% |
| Scotch Game | 1716 | 735 | 878 | 103 | 42.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1604 | 673 | 826 | 105 | 42.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1495 | 736 | 641 | 118 | 49.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1477 | 705 | 644 | 128 | 47.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1410 | 606 | 690 | 114 | 43.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 254 | 117 | 125 | 12 | 46.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 228 | 107 | 109 | 12 | 46.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 227 | 113 | 101 | 13 | 49.8% |
| French Defense | 226 | 119 | 96 | 11 | 52.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 153 | 86 | 63 | 4 | 56.2% |
| Australian Defense | 138 | 70 | 57 | 11 | 50.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 135 | 64 | 64 | 7 | 47.4% |
| Scotch Game | 133 | 56 | 69 | 8 | 42.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 119 | 53 | 57 | 9 | 44.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 118 | 65 | 43 | 10 | 55.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 88 | 31 | 49 | 8 | 35.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 83 | 33 | 43 | 7 | 39.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 75 | 34 | 36 | 5 | 45.3% |
| Petrov's Defense | 60 | 35 | 24 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 52 | 27 | 24 | 1 | 51.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 47 | 19 | 28 | 0 | 40.4% |
| Elephant Gambit | 46 | 21 | 24 | 1 | 45.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 45 | 24 | 18 | 3 | 53.3% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 44 | 18 | 21 | 5 | 40.9% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 40 | 17 | 22 | 1 | 42.5% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 27 | 3 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |