Free Palestine - Chess Player Biography
Meet Free Palestine, a chess enthusiast who dances with pawns and knights across the board with a style as unique as their username. Rated mostly in Rapid and Blitz, they’ve amassed thousands of battles, emerging victorious almost as often as they’ve bravely risked the queen.
Rating & Experience
Starting their Rapid journey in 2020 with a modest rating of 1410, Free Palestine steadily climbed up, peaking around 1687 in 2023 before settling comfortably near 1550-1560 in recent years. Blitz is a playground too, boasting a strong average rating around 1400, with a highest blitz peak above 1500. They also dabble in Bullet and Daily chess, showing a taste for quick thrills and slow contemplation alike.
Playing Style
A true chess adventurer, Free Palestine’s games average about 66 moves, showing a patient and strategic approach to squeezing out the win (or surviving the loss). Their endgame frequency is notably high at 70%, proving they don't back down when the game's down to just a few pieces. Interestingly, the player rarely resigns early, showing the stubborn heart of a true competitor.
Psychological and Tactical Prowess
This player has an incredible comeback rate of 82.5%—a phoenix rising from the ashes better than your everyday chess hero. Even after losing a piece, Free Palestine wins the match 100% of the time, making opponents second guess every capture. Their tilt factor is impressively low, at just 14, which means they keep their cool even when blundering a bishop or two.
Records & Opponents
With over 2,300 wins in Rapid and nearly 5,200 in Blitz, Free Palestine takes chess seriously… or seriously enough to keep a nearly 50% win rate amidst thousands of games. Multi-battles with known opponents like beataannabl and makaveliaka ended evenly split, showing that even rivals keep them on their toes.
Quirks & Fun Facts
- Prefers to play late at night with a peak win rate at 22:00 (almost 52%)—night owl tactics!
- Most successful day? Friday, with a humble yet consistent 50.8% win rate.
- An anecdotal winning streak of 16 games—run for cover, opponents!
- Known for “Top Secret” opening performances, proving that some moves are best kept hidden.
Whether blitzing through rapid games or carefully plotting endgames, Free Palestine embodies the spirit of a fighter who never quits and always plays with heart. A chess player for the people, by the people, and with a little dash of mysterious top secret sauce.
Overview — what you did well
Nice work staying active and creating concrete chances in your recent rapid games. Across the sample games I looked at you showed:
- Good tactical awareness — you convert opportunities quickly (see the sharp win with a mating attack against anton251251).
- Comfort in open, dynamic positions — you punish weakened kingside structures and open files well.
- Wide opening experience — you play a lot of systems (Modern, Philidor, Sicilian, Scandinavian) which gives you practical chances and keeps opponents uncomfortable.
Game-by-game highlights (quick)
Short, concrete notes on the most recent games you sent.
- Win vs anton251251 — You exploited kingside weaknesses and finished with a direct mating net. Strength: calculating forcing sequences and identifying the decisive check. Keep repeating this pattern: open lines + active queen/knight coordination.
- Win vs alam1616 — Good sharp play in the opening, you kept the initiative and forced the opponent into passive defence. Strength: grabbing space and converting pressure into a resignation.
- Loss vs olgiesilv — The game turned against you after a sequence that left your pieces awkward and allowed the opponent to break through on the kingside / seventh rank. Key theme: coordination issues between rooks and defending back-rank / entry squares.
Concrete mistakes I saw & how to avoid them
Focus on these recurring areas — correcting them will give the biggest immediate rating gains in rapid games.
- Loose coordination in the middlegame: when your rooks and queen are asked to both attack and defend, pick a clear plan (trade or double on a file). If you feel “my pieces are tripping over each other,” slow down and ask: which piece is doing the job best?
- Tactical oversights around pawn breaks and open files: in the loss you allowed a pawn break / file entry that created concrete threats. Before pushing a pawn or making a simplifying exchange, check opponent counterplay (checks, forks, back-rank mates).
- King safety after pawn storms (your win vs Anton demonstrates the reverse): pushing the h-pawn and opening files is double‑edged. If you open lines, ensure you have pieces ready to exploit the file or a safe king escape plan.
- Time management in rapid: you play many 10|0 games — keep the first 10 moves fast and principled; save thinking time for sharp tactical moments and critical endgames.
Opening advice — keep what’s working, fix the weak spots
Your openings summary shows clear strengths and a few areas to prioritize:
- Leverage what already works: Scandinavian Defense and French Defense show high win rates — keep studying these lines as “go-to” systems where you understand typical plans and tactics.
- Stabilize high-use but shaky lines: you play many games in Philidor Defense and Modern. Aim to learn 2–3 typical middlegame plans and one tactical motif for each so you don’t drift into passive positions. A short notebook of model games helps.
- Drop or limit an underperforming system in serious sessions: the Australian Defence data suggests it's less reliable for you — either prep concrete improvements or avoid it when you want a safe game.
Mini training plan — next 4 weeks
Simple, practical work you can do in short sessions (15–30 minutes):
- Daily tactics (10 problems): focus on fork/skewer/pin/back-rank themes — these come up a lot in your games.
- Two model games per week in your favoured openings (Scandinavian Defense or French Defense). Play through ideas and typical plans — not just memorising moves.
- One rapid game review daily: pick one recent loss and write down the turning point (1–2 lines). Aim for pattern recognition: where did coordination fail?
- Endgame basics: rook + pawn endgames and simple 2-rook positions — you had trouble converting/defending rook activity in a loss, so practice basic rules (activate king, rook behind passed pawn, cut off etc.).
Practical checks during a rapid game
Five quick questions to run through before you move — they take ~3–5 seconds each once you practice them:
- Are any of my pieces hanging or undefended after this move?
- Does this pawn push open a file or create a tactical target I can exploit — or one the opponent can exploit?
- If I trade pieces, do I improve or worsen my coordination/king safety?
- Do I have immediate tactics (checks, captures, threats) I must calculate now?
- How much clock time do I leave myself for the next critical phase?
Short-term goals (next 2 weeks)
Set 3 measurable goals so you can track improvement:
- Win-rate target in rapid: aim to convert the next 20 games to at least 52% practical win rate by using the Scandinavian/French as your primary weapons.
- Reduce avoidable tactical losses: after each loss, log the one tactic you missed. Target: cut those repeats by 50% over 2 weeks.
- Time control habit: finish opening moves (first 10) with at least 6 minutes on clock in 8/10 games.
Example position to study (your loss)
I added a quick replay of the loss versus olgiesilv — review the moment before 27...c4 / 28 Rxc4 to see where rooks could have coordinated better.
Use this viewer to step through the game and pause at key moments:
- Replay:
Final tips — immediate takeaways
One-sentence actions you can apply right now:
- Before any pawn push, check for immediate enemy counterplay on opened files.
- When rooks are on the board, prioritize rook activity and avoid passive doubling unless it simplifies to a won endgame.
- Practice 5–10 tactical puzzles daily and review 1 lost game per day — repetition beats raw volume.
Placeholders & next steps
Want me to do a deeper move-by-move annotation of one specific game? Tell me which game (use the opponent name or the link): anton251251, olgiesilv or cbears18. I can produce a short annotated checklist of 5 turning moves and 3 alternative lines to practice.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| anton251251 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| olgiesilv | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| cbears18 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| alam1616 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jadovskyy | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sergiynas | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| abhineet27 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| braveheartjnlv324334 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| khalidafaneh | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| santimtnez | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| anguzoju | 7W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| beataannabl | 4W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| faaas1 | 5W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| kico29492 | 5W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| makaveliaka | 4W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 787 | 1340 | 1566 | |
| 2024 | 829 | 1439 | 1556 | |
| 2023 | 859 | 1522 | 1530 | |
| 2022 | 1278 | 1560 | 668 | |
| 2021 | 1428 | 1448 | 400 | |
| 2020 | 707 | 1421 | 1493 | |
| 2019 | 779 | 1377 | ||
| 2018 | 1333 | 800 | ||
| 2017 | 867 | 1181 | ||
| 2016 | 1188 | |||
| 2015 | 1213 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 467W / 436L / 20D | 431W / 471L / 17D | 65.8 |
| 2024 | 436W / 379L / 20D | 388W / 438L / 14D | 66.0 |
| 2023 | 581W / 529L / 34D | 557W / 565L / 31D | 67.7 |
| 2022 | 408W / 396L / 15D | 408W / 412L / 14D | 68.5 |
| 2021 | 521W / 485L / 21D | 493W / 519L / 24D | 68.3 |
| 2020 | 641W / 620L / 29D | 640W / 632L / 21D | 66.2 |
| 2019 | 516W / 464L / 19D | 484W / 511L / 16D | 67.7 |
| 2018 | 377W / 344L / 14D | 354W / 364L / 20D | 66.4 |
| 2017 | 275W / 244L / 9D | 259W / 275L / 7D | 63.6 |
| 2016 | 3W / 2L / 0D | 2W / 1L / 0D | 47.2 |
| 2015 | 1W / 1L / 1D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 86.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 903 | 441 | 435 | 27 | 48.8% |
| Modern | 779 | 375 | 387 | 17 | 48.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 340 | 166 | 170 | 4 | 48.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 301 | 150 | 142 | 9 | 49.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 258 | 149 | 99 | 10 | 57.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 229 | 109 | 115 | 5 | 47.6% |
| Australian Defense | 227 | 94 | 129 | 4 | 41.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 223 | 117 | 104 | 2 | 52.5% |
| French Defense | 215 | 124 | 88 | 3 | 57.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 202 | 109 | 89 | 4 | 54.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1183 | 588 | 569 | 26 | 49.7% |
| Modern | 960 | 460 | 483 | 17 | 47.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 832 | 403 | 416 | 13 | 48.4% |
| Bishop's Opening | 567 | 281 | 273 | 13 | 49.6% |
| Australian Defense | 519 | 262 | 249 | 8 | 50.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 438 | 220 | 213 | 5 | 50.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 427 | 229 | 188 | 10 | 53.6% |
| French Defense | 415 | 226 | 179 | 10 | 54.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 397 | 203 | 180 | 14 | 51.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 305 | 155 | 149 | 1 | 50.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 25 | 12 | 13 | 0 | 48.0% |
| Bishop's Opening | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 52.9% |
| French Defense | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 1 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |