Esrosenberg: A Master of Many Faces
Esrosenberg’s chess journey is one of steady evolution and fierce competitiveness. Emerging on the scene in 2020 with a solid Blitz rating of 2309 and a Rapid rating of 2260, he quickly distinguished himself as a player who is equally at home in fast-paced blitz skirmishes, lightning‐fast bullet duels, and thoughtful rapid games. Over the years his ratings have steadily climbed—with his Blitz level peaking above 2370 and his Rapid score reaching 2414 in 2024—reflecting both dedication and resilience.
His playing style is a study in balance and adaptability. Esrosenberg is known for his love of deep endgames, as demonstrated by an endgame frequency exceeding 81%, and an average game length that shows a willingness to battle well into complex positions. His tactical awareness is exceptional: with a comeback rate of 86% and the rare feat of turning games around even after a material setback, he has earned a reputation for never giving up and for discovering resources in desperate situations.
Not merely a tactician, esrosenberg also excels in his psychological approach to the game. Maintaining a very low early resignation rate of 0.44% and a controlled tilt factor of 21, he has demonstrated that mental fortitude is as critical as board vision. His performance varies with the clock—peak win rates appear during the early morning and late evening hours—and his statistical edge as White (51.55%) over Black (46.49%) speaks to a nuanced approach to both initiative and defense.
Renowned for his well‐rounded opening repertoire, he has delved into classical systems, hypermodern ideas, and modern counter-attacking defenses alike. Whether facing familiar opponents or stepping into uncharted territory, esrosenberg’s study of opening theory and his ability to adapt mid‐game have helped him forge a career marked by consistent improvement and creative brilliance.
As his ratings have grown year by year—from his formative 2020 numbers to his impressive 2024 tallies—Esrosenberg’s journey reflects not only technical mastery but also a relentlessly determined spirit. His ability to transform adversity into opportunity, along with his balanced blend of rapid calculation and strategic planning, makes him a formidable and inspirational figure on the modern chess circuit.
Looking ahead, Esrosenberg continues to refine his craft, pushing the boundaries of his own limits and inspiring a new generation of chess enthusiasts with his innovative style and unyielding will to succeed.
Positive Aspects of Your Recent Blitz Games
Evan, it’s clear from your recent wins that you are strong in tactical awareness and endgame precision. You successfully leveraged your Colle System and showed good attacking play, especially when capitalizing on your opponent's weaknesses around the king. Your use of timely piece activity and sharp calculation helped you secure quick decisive victories. Also, your handling of the King’s Indian Defense: Larsen Variation shows solid familiarity—your win rate in this opening is quite strong, reflecting effective strategic plans in a complex dynamic setting.
- Strong tactical execution leading directly to checkmates or material gains.
- Good management of time, with well-paced moves that avoid time pressure.
- Effective use of openings you are comfortable with, like the Colle and King’s Indian Larsen.
- Ability to convert advantages reliably into wins in the late middlegame and endgame.
Areas to Improve
Your recent losses and draws suggest some key areas for growth to help you maintain and build on your solid foundations:
- Opening Diversity: While you excel in certain openings, your overall win rates hover around 50%. Introducing broader opening repertoire knowledge could prevent opponents from preparing against your favored lines.
- Handling Complex Positions: Some losses arose from middle-game complications where piece coordination and calculation could be sharpened, especially when facing stronger counterplay.
- Endgame Technique Under Pressure: Watch for moments when your clock dwindles. Improving practical endgame knowledge to handle pressure will translate into fewer losses on time and better results in complex endgames.
- Consistent Evaluation: Try to improve your assessment skills to avoid overly optimistic positions that lead to blunders or misjudgments under time constraints.
Strategic Recommendations for Improvement
To elevate your play and regain upward rating momentum, consider the following focused areas:
- Spend time reviewing your losses with an engine or coach to identify recurring tactical and strategic errors, particularly in the middle game transitions.
- Work on opening variation expansions, especially for less familiar responses your opponents often use. This will reduce early discomfort and put you in good positions more consistently.
- Practice time management drills in blitz to balance speed and accuracy, avoiding critical errors late in the clock.
- Study endgame fundamentals and practice converting minor advantages when low on time—key to improving your practical results in blitz.
- Utilize your strengths in tactical awareness by training tactics puzzles tailored around your typical opening structures and endgame motifs.
Rating and Performance Reflection
Your rating data shows a recent slight decline in rating, with a small negative change over the last month and three months, despite your high peak rating months ago. Your strength-adjusted win rate close to 50% reflects competitive performance but also room for improvement against peers of similar strength.
Focus on stabilizing your performance by minimizing losses and allowing your natural skill to translate into more wins. The positive rating trend slopes over six and twelve months suggest that with consistent training addressing the above points, you can regain and surpass your previous peaks.
Closing Encouragement
Your ability to win complicated games and maintain composure is impressive. By emphasizing practical training on openings, time management, and endgame technique, you will strengthen your blitz performance considerably. Keep up the hard work and maintain confidence in your solid chess fundamentals.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Pranav Senthilkumar | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Craig Clawitter | 5W / 0L / 0D | |
| Viktor Parfenov | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Amani Alazmi | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| colinfederer | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Eric Yuhan Li | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| Shiyam Thavandiran | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| kaisermafra | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| liusia | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| pizzalover2502 | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sleepless_knightmare | 20W / 21L / 8D | |
| goking321 | 29W / 14L / 2D | |
| apcom | 13W / 16L / 3D | |
| miso2211 | 10W / 18L / 3D | |
| Godswill Ogodogu | 14W / 14L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2492 | 2422 | ||
| 2024 | 2401 | 2374 | 2414 | 2119 |
| 2023 | 2265 | 2366 | 2289 | 2118 |
| 2022 | 2001 | 2299 | 2272 | 1880 |
| 2021 | 2209 | 2432 | 2333 | |
| 2020 | 2309 | 2260 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 70W / 59L / 14D | 49W / 74L / 15D | 81.9 |
| 2024 | 233W / 213L / 57D | 210W / 249L / 51D | 81.3 |
| 2023 | 917W / 685L / 168D | 842W / 762L / 190D | 80.8 |
| 2022 | 1221W / 908L / 265D | 1119W / 1044L / 299D | 82.3 |
| 2021 | 2391W / 1864L / 399D | 2210W / 2111L / 372D | 79.3 |
| 2020 | 1073W / 763L / 154D | 951W / 906L / 144D | 80.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 841 | 478 | 267 | 96 | 56.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 803 | 412 | 321 | 70 | 51.3% |
| Döry Defense | 681 | 338 | 291 | 52 | 49.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 651 | 315 | 261 | 75 | 48.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 464 | 226 | 194 | 44 | 48.7% |
| Réti Opening | 453 | 240 | 186 | 27 | 53.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 424 | 218 | 182 | 24 | 51.4% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 422 | 197 | 190 | 35 | 46.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 398 | 191 | 173 | 34 | 48.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 391 | 169 | 197 | 25 | 43.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 141 | 77 | 52 | 12 | 54.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 126 | 71 | 47 | 8 | 56.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 99 | 53 | 37 | 9 | 53.5% |
| Döry Defense | 66 | 25 | 33 | 8 | 37.9% |
| Australian Defense | 63 | 33 | 25 | 5 | 52.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 57 | 32 | 25 | 0 | 56.1% |
| Modern | 51 | 26 | 22 | 3 | 51.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 50 | 22 | 24 | 4 | 44.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 47 | 33 | 13 | 1 | 70.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 44 | 27 | 16 | 1 | 61.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 90 | 50 | 29 | 11 | 55.6% |
| Döry Defense | 49 | 24 | 15 | 10 | 49.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 48 | 25 | 18 | 5 | 52.1% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 45 | 18 | 19 | 8 | 40.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 43 | 26 | 10 | 7 | 60.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 42 | 25 | 11 | 6 | 59.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 36 | 22 | 9 | 5 | 61.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 35 | 14 | 15 | 6 | 40.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Berlin Wall | 30 | 12 | 13 | 5 | 40.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 29 | 16 | 9 | 4 | 55.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 28 | 0 |
| Losing | 21 | 0 |