Marcus Joseph - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Marcus Joseph, known in the realms of chess circles as essequamvideris, is not just your everyday chess player but a proud bearer of the FIDE Master title. If chess had a VIP lounge, Marcus would definitely have a reserved seat with a snack and a cheeky grin.
Journey Through the Ranks
Starting from modest beginnings with blitz ratings around 1400 in 2013, Marcus has steadily blitzed through the ranks, hitting a peak blitz rating of an impressive 2472 in November 2022. Bullet fans might have spotted Marcus with lightning-fast moves crowned by an astonishing peak bullet rating of 2616 in mid-2022. Not to be outdone, rapid games showcase a formidable peak of 2393 as recently as 2025. Clearly, Marcus can handle fire—whether it's a 1-minute bullet or a gruelling 60-minute battle.
Playing Style & Strengths
Known for their tactical prowess, Marcus has an exceptional 83.25% comeback rate, proving they are the ultimate chess phoenix. Endgames are a favorite battleground, with an impressive 71.99% endgame frequency and an average of 60 moves to victory—talk about stamina! Staying calm under pressure, Marcus’ tilt factor is a mere 14, which in chess terms is basically zen-level calmness. And for the insomniacs out there, 1 AM is prime time for Marcus to unleash some deadly moves.
Signature Openings & Challenges
Whether wielding the English Opening or dancing around the Modern Defense, Marcus maintains a solid win rate above 50%. Special shoutout to the Reti Opening Kingside Fianchetto Variation, where Marcus shines with a winning rate over 60%. But beware the Kings Indian Attack Sicilian Variation—a tricky nemesis where victory is a bit harder to come by.
Notable Stats & Opponents
- Total Blitz Wins: 6,394
- Total Bullet Wins: 5,312
- Total Rapid Wins: 62 (they're picky about the pace!)
- Longest Winning Streak: 55 games (someone call the Guinness folks!)
- Favorite Victim: goldentomato (181 battles fought!)
Recent Battles
In a recent encounter, Marcus dazzled with a strategic performance in the English Opening, edging out their opponent on time. If patience is a virtue, Marcus owns a trophy room full of it. On the flip side, every warrior faces setbacks: a recent loss by resignation in a King's Indian Attack shows even FIDE Masters have to respect an opponent’s clever tactics.
The Final Word
Marcus Joseph embodies the perfect blend of skill, patience, and a dash of cheeky resilience. Whether it’s bullet, blitz, rapid, or daily chess, Marcus keeps it classy and competitive. Just don’t expect them to resign early—unless it's to grab a snack or post a witty tweet about the latest chess drama.
Overall Performance & Rating Trends
Marcus, your recent performance in blitz games shows a solid foundation with your strength adjusted win rate just above 50%. Your 6 month rating improvement of 75 points indicates significant progress over that period, while a nearly flat 3 month rating change suggests you are stabilizing your skills. The upward slopes in your short term rating trends (1- and 3-month) reflect positive momentum lately, despite a slight 1-month rating decrease of 2 points and a modest decline over 12 months. Keep focusing on consistent play to convert your upward trends into lasting gains.
Positive Aspects from Recent Games
- Your tactical awareness shines, particularly in identifying and capitalizing on opponent weaknesses — as seen in your well-executed finishing combinations leading to checkmates.
- Good opening preparation and adapting to opponents’ responses effectively, such as strong use of the Alapin Sicilian Defense and Modern Defense approaches.
- Maintaining strong initiative in the mid and endgame phases helped you win complex positions against similarly rated opponents.
- Well-timed pawn breaks and piece activity increased pressure, demonstrated in your control of open files and central squares.
Areas to Improve
- Time management: Some losses resulted from deteriorating quickly in time pressure. Practice allocating your clock better to ensure thoughtful move calculation during critical moments.
- Defensive technique: In a few games, attempts to hold difficult positions faltered, especially against active piece play from your opponents. Focus on solidifying defense under pressure.
- Exploit endgame technique: In losses where material was approximately even, increasing your endgame knowledge and precision could convert close positions into wins or draws.
- Opening diversification: While your familiarity with certain openings is an asset, exploring variations or new lines can keep your opponents guessing and reduce predictability.
Recommended Focus for Coming Weeks
- Work on classic endgame fundamentals: king and pawn, rook endgames, and basic mating patterns.
- Time management drills using slow rapid or blitz formats with an emphasis on maintaining a steady pace.
- Analyze your recent losses, particularly those lost by resignation or on time, to pinpoint recurring tactical or strategic errors.
- Incorporate training puzzles based on tactical motifs you encountered and missed in your games.
- Continue to refine your favored openings but add at least one surprise weapon or alternative system.
Final Thoughts
Marcus, your steady improvements are encouraging, especially the substantial 6 month rating gain and positive recent trend slopes. Blitz is a fast-paced format that rewards both quick calculation and solid strategy. Keep honing your time usage and endgame skills, and you’ll continue climbing confidently. Remember to learn from both wins and losses by reviewing your games regularly. Stay motivated and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| goldentomato | 107W / 74L / 0D | |
| lemon | 123W / 33L / 0D | |
| humblespaceman | 41W / 53L / 2D | |
| 4pcg | 41W / 38L / 7D | |
| rrr12 | 33W / 39L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2331 | 2450 | 2404 | |
| 2024 | 2228 | 2374 | 2384 | |
| 2023 | 1854 | 1852 | ||
| 2022 | 1853 | 1839 | 2302 | |
| 2021 | 1647 | |||
| 2020 | 2441 | 1949 | ||
| 2019 | 2441 | |||
| 2018 | 2330 | |||
| 2017 | 2325 | 2274 | ||
| 2016 | 2202 | |||
| 2015 | 1985 | 1952 | 1867 | |
| 2014 | 1955 | 1822 | ||
| 2013 | 1810 | 1857 | ||
| 2012 | 1822 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 979W / 622L / 35D | 942W / 650L / 41D | 60.5 |
| 2024 | 1436W / 1194L / 95D | 1237W / 1366L / 123D | 67.7 |
| 2023 | 32W / 15L / 0D | 32W / 9L / 0D | 54.5 |
| 2022 | 2777W / 1981L / 189D | 2540W / 2315L / 134D | 68.8 |
| 2021 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 38.5 |
| 2020 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 102.8 |
| 2019 | 4W / 1L / 0D | 3W / 1L / 1D | 83.0 |
| 2018 | 50W / 32L / 2D | 38W / 44L / 1D | 69.7 |
| 2017 | 424W / 377L / 18D | 352W / 434L / 20D | 70.2 |
| 2016 | 27W / 15L / 2D | 25W / 16L / 3D | 69.1 |
| 2015 | 343W / 267L / 22D | 349W / 256L / 35D | 72.9 |
| 2014 | 309W / 289L / 20D | 316W / 284L / 26D | 69.7 |
| 2013 | 18W / 12L / 1D | 14W / 17L / 0D | 60.1 |
| 2012 | 8W / 7L / 2D | 13W / 4L / 1D | 66.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 1512 | 744 | 734 | 34 | 49.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1082 | 573 | 477 | 32 | 53.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 782 | 502 | 266 | 14 | 64.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 693 | 358 | 300 | 35 | 51.7% |
| Australian Defense | 647 | 305 | 329 | 13 | 47.1% |
| King's Indian Attack | 495 | 242 | 240 | 13 | 48.9% |
| French Defense | 409 | 338 | 69 | 2 | 82.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 351 | 266 | 84 | 1 | 75.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 307 | 154 | 143 | 10 | 50.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 268 | 137 | 125 | 6 | 51.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 1970 | 931 | 977 | 62 | 47.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 714 | 340 | 345 | 29 | 47.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 627 | 289 | 313 | 25 | 46.1% |
| Australian Defense | 469 | 242 | 219 | 8 | 51.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 444 | 343 | 93 | 8 | 77.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 443 | 250 | 178 | 15 | 56.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 406 | 195 | 193 | 18 | 48.0% |
| French Defense | 402 | 342 | 56 | 4 | 85.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 346 | 257 | 87 | 2 | 74.3% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 335 | 150 | 167 | 18 | 44.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 73.3% |
| Modern | 13 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 23.1% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Scotch Game | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 4.cxd5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 55 | 2 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |