Ilja Biriukov - International Master
Meet Ilja Biriukov, a chess enthusiast who has proudly earned the prestigious title of International Master from FIDE. Known among online circles as Ezov, Ilja's chess journey is as thrilling as a queen's gambit and as unpredictable as a knight on a wild spree.
Starting with modest blitz ratings back in 2017 barely above a casual club player, Ilja didn't just improve – they exploded onto the scene, soaring to a blitz peak over 2400 in 2020 and demonstrating a bullet mastery that turbocharged to a sizzling 2413 rating! They've accumulated over 2200 wins combined in Blitz, Bullet, and Rapid formats, proving that whether it's lightning-fast bullet or the more contemplative rapid, Ilja plays it with finesse — and occasionally a pinch of chaos.
Ilja’s playing style can be described as a dramatic chess film: an average win lasts 68 moves which implies they savor every moment on the board, and an impressive 84.5% comeback rate shows never counting them out, even when pieces mysteriously vanish from their side. Precision and resilience are their signature moves, partnered with an ironclad psychological makeup (although a tilt factor of 12 means sometimes the keyboard feels the heat).
Ilja shines brightest playing White, boasting a win rate north of 58%, while holding their ground solidly as Black too. Whether it’s during calm weekday mornings at 7 AM with a 67% win rate or the mysterious zone of 11 PM with an outstanding 83% win rate, Ilja seems virtually unstoppable.
Opponents beware: Ilja has bested some with a perfect 100% record, while others found the going tough against this Top Secret opening strategist. Collaborating patterns, swift maneuvering, and a dash of unpredictability keep Ilja’s adversaries on their toes.
Off the board, Ilja probably enjoys a hearty laugh about their chess escapades – because with stats this intense, what’s life without a little chessboard drama?
Feedback for Ilja Biriukov
Ilja, you've been showing steady progress in your games recently, and it's great to see your fighting spirit in complex positions. Here are some targeted observations and constructive suggestions based on your recent performance:
Strengths
- Opening Knowledge: You frequently employ solid openings like the Slav Defense, Queen’s Pawn structures, and English Defense, which give you a reliable basis to build on.
- Active Play and Initiative: Your games show good attempts to seize the initiative early, for example aggressive pawn pushes and timely piece activity (e.g., 12. e4 and 15. g4 in your wins), which puts your opponents on the back foot.
- Tactical Awareness: You’ve demonstrated the ability to exploit tactical motifs such as pins, captures, and timely sacrifices (example: 24. Bxf7+ followed by Bxe8 in one of your recent wins), which is a great asset.
Areas for Improvement
- Time Management: A pattern in some games suggests a tendency to run low on the clock and lose on time. Try to allocate your time more evenly, perhaps by practicing faster calculation without sacrificing accuracy.
- Endgame Technique: Some losses occur in close, technical endgames. Improving your endgame fundamentals, especially pawn structure and king activity, will help convert advantages more consistently.
- Positional Understanding: There are moments where exchanges or piece placements could be optimized. Focus on controlling key squares, coordinating your pieces harmoniously, and avoiding unnecessary exchanges that relieve opponent’s tension.
- Opening Depth: While your openings are solid, deepening your preparation in your favorite lines will allow you to stay ahead of your opponent early on and avoid passive positions.
Recommendations
- Review critical moments in your losses to understand the turning points — for example, study why the position after 20...Rxd5 led to difficulties, and how you could better respond in similar situations.
- Practice tactical puzzles regularly to sharpen your calculation and spotting opportunities in the heat of the game.
- Work on time control: use online training tools that mimic tournament time formats to build comfort managing your clock.
- Explore more endgame studies, focusing on common rook and minor piece endgames and king activity.
Overall, keep up the consistent effort, and remember each game—win or lose—is a valuable learning experience. Your proactive style is promising; channel that energy with improved strategic planning and time management to reach your next milestone.
Feel free to share more games or specific positions you'd like to analyze together!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| fkp37 | 124W / 28L / 2D | View Games |
| fforgottenage | 27W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| Tansel Turgut | 13W / 7L / 4D | View Games |
| zagrebov | 9W / 10L / 3D | View Games |
| vlatko bogdanovski | 9W / 11L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2187 | 1968 | ||
| 2023 | 2114 | 2160 | 1914 | |
| 2022 | 2413 | 2237 | ||
| 2021 | 2413 | 2399 | ||
| 2020 | 2413 | 2385 | ||
| 2019 | 1768 | 2392 | ||
| 2018 | 1792 | 2141 | ||
| 2017 | 1874 | 1410 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 12W / 23L / 0D | 10W / 21L / 1D | 69.2 |
| 2023 | 31W / 59L / 5D | 37W / 53L / 9D | 75.4 |
| 2022 | 29W / 32L / 12D | 30W / 38L / 4D | 67.2 |
| 2021 | 65W / 13L / 0D | 59W / 16L / 2D | 57.6 |
| 2020 | 62W / 38L / 16D | 57W / 56L / 15D | 75.6 |
| 2019 | 533W / 253L / 87D | 474W / 291L / 107D | 75.7 |
| 2018 | 40W / 15L / 5D | 29W / 31L / 1D | 72.3 |
| 2017 | 12W / 8L / 0D | 11W / 7L / 1D | 69.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 135 | 69 | 53 | 13 | 51.1% |
| Benko Gambit | 108 | 59 | 37 | 12 | 54.6% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed | 97 | 62 | 21 | 14 | 63.9% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 82 | 46 | 30 | 6 | 56.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 81 | 45 | 28 | 8 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 80 | 47 | 23 | 10 | 58.8% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 75 | 36 | 25 | 14 | 48.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 68 | 44 | 18 | 6 | 64.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 66 | 42 | 16 | 8 | 63.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 65 | 24 | 38 | 3 | 36.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Orthodox Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Modern Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Fianchetto Variation, Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 47 | 35 | 10 | 2 | 74.5% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 28 | 22 | 6 | 0 | 78.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 19 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 63.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Australian Defense | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| French Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 2 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |