Chess Player Profile: fla2021
Fla2021 has demonstrated remarkable resilience and consistent growth in the chess world since 2019. Starting with a modest Blitz rating of 1200 in October 2019, fla2021 has impressively scaled the competitive ranks to reach notable peaks over 2000 at different junctures. In terms of their Blitz games, they experienced rapid progress beginning in mid-2021, indicating a deepening understanding of complex patterns and strategies.
Game Formats and Ratings
The player's proficiency is reflected across various game formats:
- Blitz: Peaking at over 2000, fla2021 has mastered fast-paced decisions.
- Daily: While starting with lower ratings, they have shown determination in reaching a consistent level since 2021.
- Rapid: Fla2021's Rapid skills are highlighted by their peak periods in 2022.
- Bullet: A relatively newer journey in Bullet, fla2021 has quickly advanced over the course.
Streaks and Opponent Performance
Fla2021 holds a longest winning streak of 16 games, which is testament to their sustained focus and strategic proficiency. They have faced multiple opponents like danieldupler and Tkachenko3025, demonstrating a high win rate against frequent challengers.
Tactical Awareness and Playing Style
Characterized by a comeback rate of 72.37%, fla2021 excels at turning unfavorable positions around. Their win rate after losing a piece is a striking 100%, emphasizing a mental toughness that keeps them competitive under pressure. With an endgame frequency of more than 50%, they showcase a robust understanding of closing tactics. Fla2021’s win rates with white (68.15%) and black (63.32%) pieces reflect a balanced strategic capability.
Psychological and Strategic Insights
Having a tilt factor of 11, fla2021’s psychological resilience is noteworthy. They show their best performance around mid-morning, particularly at 10 a.m., where their win rate is optimal. Despite a difference in performance between rated and casual games, their drive remains consistent across formats.
Conclusion
Fla2021 exemplifies the quintessential journey of a chess player dedicated to continuous improvement. With substantial accomplishments in contextual gameplay, tactical intelligence, and psychological stability, they remain a formidable presence across diverse chess formats.
Hi Flavia! 👋 Here is some tailored feedback on your recent play.
1. Quick statistical snapshot
• Your current personal best in rapid stands at 2070 (2022-11-22).
• Activity peaks at certain hours – see
• Day-to-day consistency fluctuates; compare weekdays vs. week-end on .
2. What you are already doing well
- Keen eye for tactics. Your wins against greevanchuk and skulpta show accurate combinations like 17.Nf4! and 22.Nc7!! exploiting overloaded pieces.
- Fighting spirit in unclear positions. You often steer the game into dynamic play (e.g. Scandinavian Gambit lines) and succeed when the clock doesn’t intervene.
- Good practical choice of openings. 1…d5 versus 1.e4 and the Center-Game–style set-ups with White fit a tactical player and yield early imbalances.
3. Recurrent issues that cost you points
- Time management – five of the six listed live losses ended on time. Consider adopting a “move-every-10 seconds” rule in blitz and reserve the final minute for the endgame.
- Premature pawn storms around your own king. The pushes …g5 (vs Litocm) and h4-g4-h5 (vs bifteck77) weakened dark squares. Learn the idea of prophylaxis: ask “what will my opponent attack if I push this pawn?”
- Loose queen moves in the Center Game. In the loss to joramx you played 3.Qxd4 and 4.Qd3–h5–f3. Early queen excursions let Black gain tempi with …Nc6 …Nf6 …Bc5. Switching to 3.Nf3 or 3.exd4 Scandinavian-style may reduce this risk.
- Endgame conversion. Against emdener61 you reached a winning rook ending but missed the technical plan (activate king, cut the enemy king, push passed pawn) and flagged. Endgames reward method over inspiration; 10 minutes of daily study will pay off quickly.
4. Micro-lesson from your most recent win
Position after 5…h6 6.Bh4 (Nimzowitsch Defence)
r1bqkbnr/ppp1npp1/3p3p/3Pp3/4P2B/5N2/PPP2PPP/RN1QKB1R b KQkq - 1 6
Black’s last move 5…h6 weakens g6 and the dark squares. Instead of routine development, look for an immediate break: 6.Bb5+! c6 7.dxc6 bxc6 8.Bc4 and Black’s king is stuck in the center.
Spotting such intermezzo (Zwischenzug) opportunities will raise your ceiling. Train them via puzzle rush or the “Check, Capture, Threat” scan every move.
5. Action plan for the next two weeks
- Opening tightening (30 min). Replace 3.Qxd4 with 3.Nf3 in the Center Game lines; review one short YouTube clip or opening article and create a flash-card with your first 10 moves.
- Clock discipline drill (15 min daily). Play 3-minute games but force yourself to move within 5 seconds for the first 15 plies, no matter what. This builds automatic pattern recognition.
- Endgame habit (15 min daily). Work through 10 rook-endgame positions (e.g. “Lucena”, “Philidor”) until you can explain the plan out loud. Use the built-in drills or Chess.com endgame trainer.
- Post-game reflection (5 min each game). Immediately after finishing, ask:
What was the first move I didn’t fully evaluate?
Write it down; patterns will emerge.
6. Motivational closer
You have already demonstrated tactical sharpness and a fearless style. By adding stricter time discipline and a bit of defensive sobriety, crossing the 1200 daily and 2000 blitz thresholds is realistic in 2025. Keep the passion, keep analysing, and enjoy every move!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| stevebc | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| winnermindset_2003 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| inalelub | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| jojo10111011 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| hannibalbarcaofcarthage | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| keremitkotuhlev | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| starpaw | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| estking5 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| drcengiz116 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| 1708phone | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Dupler | 39W / 1L / 2D | |
| Tkachenko3025 | 22W / 2L / 2D | |
| Neil V | 16W / 2L / 0D | |
| edgecraftyt | 12W / 0L / 0D | |
| menlime | 7W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1865 | 2102 | 1181 | 1031 |
| 2024 | 1568 | 1980 | 1278 | 1115 |
| 2023 | 2031 | 1278 | 1009 | |
| 2022 | 1302 | 2023 | 1274 | 1100 |
| 2021 | 1935 | 1252 | 783 | |
| 2020 | 1623 | |||
| 2019 | 1900 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 47W / 26L / 2D | 48W / 23L / 3D | 59.9 |
| 2024 | 55W / 32L / 3D | 58W / 37L / 3D | 59.0 |
| 2023 | 44W / 7L / 2D | 37W / 7L / 6D | 55.0 |
| 2022 | 47W / 13L / 2D | 49W / 21L / 2D | 58.1 |
| 2021 | 14W / 10L / 2D | 15W / 12L / 0D | 54.9 |
| 2020 | 4W / 3L / 0D | 2W / 3L / 0D | 46.9 |
| 2019 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 72.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 26 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 65.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 36 | 19 | 17 | 0 | 52.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Modern | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 21 | 18 | 2 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 81.2% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 81.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Four Knights Game | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Petrov's Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 1 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |