Dan Herman (aka Flaccidmoves)
Dan Herman is a crafty National Master, a title that says, “Yes, I know my knights from my bishops... most of the time.” Nicknamed Flaccidmoves online (because who hasn't had a few questionable moves?), Dan has earned respect for a dynamic and resilient playing style.
Starting around 2016, Dan’s bullet rating soared from a humble 1401 to a blazing peak near 2600! Not bad for someone who occasionally contemplates if pushing a pawn really counts as a “move.” In blitz, Dan also flourished, reaching a high of 2590 in mid-2024, crushing opponents faster than you can say "Check!"
Dan’s games are a rollercoaster of brilliant tactics and stubborn defense. With a comeback rate over 68%, it's like watching a phoenix repeatedly rising from its own chessboard ashes. Dan wins nearly 55-60% of their games with both unknown and secret openings—because top-level secrecy is the best opening of all.
A strategist with patience, Dan’s endgame frequency is high and they average about 58 moves per win, showing games where even pawns earn their keep. On the psychological front, Dan has a tilt factor around 13, so let’s just say losing early doesn’t usually result in throwing the keyboard (though moments of keyboard-throwing remain unconfirmed).
Known for gaming best in the afternoon, around noon, Dan’s favorite times to strike tend to have a ~80% win rate, making them a formidable opponent when the sun is high and coffee is strong.
Playing Style
- Early Resignation Rate: 17.7% – Sometimes even Dan knows when the fish have jumped out of the frying pan.
- Endgame Frequency: 65% – Stick around, because that’s where Dan shines.
- White Pieces Win Rate: 57.4%
- Black Pieces Win Rate: 54.5%
Tactical Brilliance
Dan’s resilience is legendary with a 68.4% comeback rate and a solid 52.1% win rate even after losing a piece. In other words, don’t be too quick to cheer your material gains.
Notable Recent Game
In a 2025 bullet match against golobnjak, Dan employed the Modern Defense and won by resignation after a hard-fought 43-move battle, demonstrating Dan’s knack for squeezing opponents out in strategic endgames.
Opponent Highlights
Among frequent foes, Dan holds a slim but respectable edge against top regulars like termenoil (52.6% win rate) and dominates players such as interactivechess (nearly 89% wins). Yet, beware the quirky underdog, who might just sneak a surprising win from Dan now and then.
All in all, Dan Herman is your friendly neighborhood chess wizard: skilled, persistent, and always ready to outwit another opponent while keeping a sharp sense of humor about the chaotic battlefield known as the chessboard.
Follow Dan if you enjoy creative plays, tough endgames, and the occasional blunder that somehow leads to a comeback! Because in the end, chess is a game of learning—and laughs.
Overall Performance
Dan, your recent rapid games show a positive trend in performance with a strength adjusted win rate just above 52%. Your rating has steadily increased by 11 points in the last 6 months, reflecting consistent improvement. The positive rating trend slope also suggests you are on an upward path to strengthening your skills.
Opening Choices and Effectiveness
Your games feature a good variety of openings such as the Modern Defense Averbakh Variation, Queen's Gambit Accepted, and Sicilian Defense. You have been able to capitalize on these openings effectively, with notable wins achieved by applying thematic plans and pressure on your opponents. For example, aggressive pawn pushes have secured space advantage and attacking chances.
- Consider continuing to deepen your understanding of these favored openings, especially their middle game plans.
- Review critical moments where your opponent exploited weaknesses to strengthen your defensive setups.
Game Analysis - Key Strengths
- Strong positional play: You managed space gains and improved your piece activity effectively.
- Endgame skill: In multiple games, you converted material and positional advantages into winnings, showing good technique.
- Tactical alertness: Your ability to spot and execute tactics was evident, often increasing pressure leading to opponent resignations.
Areas for Improvement
- In some losses, your opponent gained initiative through subtle piece activity and pawn breaks; honing your opening defense against these ideas will be beneficial.
- Time management in a few games could be improved; ensure you keep some time buffer to think through critical moves later.
- Review complex positions where your evaluation may have been off, to avoid underestimating opponent plans.
Next Steps
To continue your progress, focus on:
- Studying typical plans in your main openings and understanding pawn structure nuances.
- Practicing tactical exercises regularly to maintain alertness in sharp positions.
- Analyzing your losses with the help of engine insights to understand turnaround moments.
- Playing consistent rapid games to convert your growing knowledge into practical strength.
Your progress is clear and steady. Keep up the focused training and enjoy your chess journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| termenoil | 110W / 87L / 12D | |
| Jonathan | 173W / 16L / 6D | |
| checkwondo | 77W / 58L / 2D | |
| nochewycandy | 29W / 96L / 3D | |
| Dennis Norman | 38W / 22L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2537 | 2442 | 2294 | |
| 2024 | 2553 | 2502 | 1866 | |
| 2023 | 2473 | 2407 | 2283 | 1864 |
| 2022 | 2552 | 2532 | 2148 | 1864 |
| 2021 | 2378 | 2356 | 2234 | 1864 |
| 2020 | 2318 | 2396 | 2277 | 1839 |
| 2019 | 2364 | 2349 | 1932 | 1692 |
| 2018 | 2253 | 2227 | 1905 | 1682 |
| 2017 | 2095 | 1969 | 1938 | 1511 |
| 2016 | 1924 | 2061 | 1158 | 1564 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 25W / 28L / 2D | 25W / 33L / 3D | 77.8 |
| 2024 | 305W / 250L / 57D | 269W / 283L / 47D | 83.7 |
| 2023 | 215W / 204L / 34D | 188W / 220L / 36D | 83.2 |
| 2022 | 701W / 413L / 79D | 645W / 448L / 102D | 77.0 |
| 2021 | 769W / 473L / 79D | 755W / 506L / 69D | 65.3 |
| 2020 | 783W / 467L / 40D | 710W / 498L / 64D | 34.8 |
| 2019 | 733W / 519L / 69D | 764W / 543L / 71D | 53.0 |
| 2018 | 1078W / 625L / 82D | 1045W / 666L / 95D | 71.9 |
| 2017 | 258W / 166L / 20D | 241W / 179L / 20D | 69.4 |
| 2016 | 167W / 129L / 7D | 160W / 120L / 20D | 59.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 318 | 176 | 130 | 12 | 55.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 241 | 127 | 102 | 12 | 52.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 221 | 123 | 91 | 7 | 55.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 164 | 87 | 70 | 7 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 140 | 89 | 45 | 6 | 63.6% |
| Modern | 134 | 66 | 61 | 7 | 49.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 133 | 59 | 67 | 7 | 44.4% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 110 | 58 | 47 | 5 | 52.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 106 | 46 | 52 | 8 | 43.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 102 | 52 | 44 | 6 | 51.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2947 | 1760 | 1170 | 17 | 59.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 360 | 206 | 126 | 28 | 57.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 326 | 162 | 143 | 21 | 49.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 322 | 179 | 118 | 25 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 307 | 182 | 111 | 14 | 59.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 291 | 164 | 111 | 16 | 56.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 285 | 190 | 82 | 13 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 263 | 154 | 95 | 14 | 58.6% |
| Modern | 252 | 127 | 108 | 17 | 50.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 241 | 131 | 90 | 20 | 54.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Czech Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 14 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 64.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 12.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 26 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |