Flora: A Journey of Strategic Brilliance
Flora’s chess career is a story of constant evolution and tactical ingenuity. She burst onto the scene with promising early results, establishing herself in diverse time controls—from rapid to blitz and even bullet. Over the years, her ratings have shown a steady, impressive climb, with her blitz and rapid play often nearing or surpassing 1900 and even 2100 points in peak periods. This progression reflects not only her natural talent but also a dedication to refining her skills against a broad spectrum of opponents.
Known for a balanced approach that combines both long-term strategic planning and acute tactical awareness, Flora has built her reputation on resilience and smart recovery. Her comeback rate exceeds 80%, and she frequently manages to consolidate positions despite early setbacks. Even when the game appears one-sided, Flora’s ability to claw back—often winning games after losing a piece—speaks volumes about her psychological strength and adaptability.
Her playing style is marked by an emphasis on the endgame, where her methodical planning comes to the forefront. With an average of just under 70 moves per win, Flora’s games reveal a chess mind that thrives on precision and an insightful understanding of both the opening and the later stages of play. Statistical trends from her career even show subtle shifts in performance depending on the time of day and day of the week, illustrating her nuanced adaptation to competitive pressures.
Beyond the numbers, Flora’s demeanor at the board is the hallmark of a true competitor—calm, focused, and unflappable under pressure. With a low tilt factor and a modest difference between her rated and casual results, she exemplifies the mental fortitude needed to excel in high-stakes tournaments. As Flora continues to test her limits in the chess arena, her journey remains an inspiring testament to hard work, perseverance, and the endless pursuit of strategic mastery.
Feedback for Hema Vikas
Hema, your recent games show promising understanding of pawn structures and piece activity, especially in your handling of the Modern Defense setups. Here are some personalized points to help you improve further:
- Opening Consistency: You consistently develop pieces logically and castle early, which is excellent. Keep working on specific opening lines, like the Modern Defense variations you play often, to gain deeper tactical and strategic understanding.
- Calculation & Tactics: In your wins, you demonstrated good patience and tactical alertness, such as well-timed pawn breaks and piece exchanges. Try to increase your calculation depth in complex positions to avoid missing tactical motifs, especially when your king safety is slightly compromised.
- Endgame Technique: Some losses indicate opportunities for better endgame technique. Studying basic endgames, like rook and pawn endings, will build confidence to convert advantages or hold difficult positions.
- Time Management: You handle your clock reasonably well, but in some games, sharper time usage could give you more room to evaluate critical moves and avoid rushed mistakes.
Overall, your progress is clear and steady. Focus on strengthening your tactical vision and on endgame fundamentals to complement your solid opening play.
Keep analyzing your games carefully — you can also revisit your winning games to see practical plans that worked well. For example, in your successful game against TimmyTaterTots, you executed strong pressure on the queenside and utilized your resources efficiently to gain a decisive advantage.
Well done and keep up the consistent training and playing!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| derpytom | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| krysthoffis | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| mchesspb | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| zako99 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| michaelo2009 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| juju_ky | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Rachmaforever | 1W / 4L / 1D | View |
| gm_garrykaratroxjr | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| chanhung1704 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| frankrod24 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| astonalex | 47W / 94L / 14D | View Games |
| Chloe Gaw | 40W / 83L / 11D | View Games |
| freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee | 41W / 59L / 13D | View Games |
| Kiren Vivek Nasta | 16W / 54L / 8D | View Games |
| vampiricpawn | 17W / 41L / 7D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2126 | 2239 | 2088 | |
| 2024 | 2108 | 2014 | 1898 | 1597 |
| 2023 | 1958 | 2011 | 1861 | 1431 |
| 2022 | 1988 | 1395 | 1897 | |
| 2021 | 1658 | 1556 | 1876 | |
| 2020 | 1134 | 1276 | 1483 | 1379 |
| 2019 | 1086 | 1189 | 1542 | 982 |
| 2018 | 1252 | 1169 | 1320 | 1096 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 493W / 600L / 85D | 455W / 634L / 95D | 77.1 |
| 2024 | 608W / 534L / 119D | 603W / 564L / 77D | 76.9 |
| 2023 | 565W / 568L / 81D | 542W / 557L / 91D | 73.0 |
| 2022 | 449W / 455L / 75D | 441W / 468L / 73D | 78.6 |
| 2021 | 249W / 146L / 18D | 216W / 152L / 22D | 69.5 |
| 2020 | 122W / 98L / 13D | 122W / 109L / 7D | 38.2 |
| 2019 | 44W / 30L / 4D | 46W / 32L / 2D | 57.2 |
| 2018 | 37W / 33L / 3D | 35W / 40L / 1D | 58.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 127 | 77 | 46 | 4 | 60.6% |
| French Defense | 43 | 19 | 18 | 6 | 44.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 43 | 22 | 18 | 3 | 51.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 30 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 28 | 12 | 13 | 3 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 24 | 13 | 8 | 3 | 54.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 23 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 52.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 21 | 5 | 15 | 1 | 23.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 18 | 8 | 8 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 414 | 255 | 158 | 1 | 61.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 87 | 42 | 34 | 11 | 48.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 84 | 35 | 40 | 9 | 41.7% |
| Modern | 70 | 33 | 34 | 3 | 47.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 62 | 30 | 25 | 7 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 49 | 24 | 20 | 5 | 49.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 46 | 23 | 20 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 42 | 16 | 22 | 4 | 38.1% |
| French Defense | 37 | 20 | 16 | 1 | 54.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 36 | 15 | 20 | 1 | 41.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1386 | 637 | 656 | 93 | 46.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 515 | 219 | 264 | 32 | 42.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 485 | 195 | 245 | 45 | 40.2% |
| Modern | 469 | 214 | 222 | 33 | 45.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 310 | 134 | 150 | 26 | 43.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 241 | 109 | 120 | 12 | 45.2% |
| Australian Defense | 216 | 97 | 100 | 19 | 44.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 197 | 87 | 96 | 14 | 44.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 197 | 79 | 103 | 15 | 40.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 179 | 91 | 76 | 12 | 50.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Neo-Modern Variation, Nyezhmetdinov Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Poisoned Pawn Accepted | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 1 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |