Meet S A aka "fork321"
S A, known online as fork321, is a dedicated and daring chess enthusiast whose journey through the 64 squares has been a saga of ups, downs, and tactical surprises. Starting with a modest blitz rating just over 1300 in 2012, fork321 quickly honed their skills and climbed steadily to a peak blitz rating of 2329 in January 2024—proving that every pawn push and knight fork counts.
Playing Style & Achievements
Like a calculated storm, fork321 combines solid strategies with a willingness to dive headfirst into complex middlegames, boasting an impressive White win rate of 50.54% and never shying away from the challenge when playing Black with a respectable 48.35% win rate. Their games tend to be long and thrilling, with an average of 70 moves per win, demonstrating stamina and deep endgame knowledge, as evidenced by an endgame frequency of over 71%.
When the heat is on, fork321 shines brightest. Their remarkable comeback rate of 84.49% and tactical acumen (almost half the time they win even after losing a piece!) reveal nerves of steel and a creative mind that won’t easily back down.
Opening Mystery
True to their username, fork321 keeps their opponents guessing with a repertoire labeled as "Top Secret", featuring nearly 14,000 blitz games. However, they also show a fondness for classic darlings such as the French Defense, Queen's Gambit Declined variations, and the King's Indian Defense Gligoric System, balancing solid foundations with strategic surprises.
Warrior of Speed
With thousands of games under their belt, fork321 plays across all time controls but is especially fierce in blitz, with over 7,000 wins. Bullet games? They've been there too, topping out at an impressive rating over 2300 and showcasing lightning-fast reflexes. Rapid and daily formats highlight their adaptability, hitting highs above 2200 too.
Recent Battles
Recent games tell tales of fierce contests and tactical brilliance. Their latest victory showcased sharp play in a Queen’s Pawn opening, concluding with a victorious sacrifice that left the audience wondering if it was genius or madness (spoiler: it was genius).
Of course, not every battle ends in glory; fork321 knows the taste of defeat, sometimes losing by time or facing opponents who just got the better end of those forks. But like every great player, they learn, adapt, and come back stronger—probably ready to ambush you next time.
Off the Board
When not commanding legions of pawns and knights, fork321 could be the mysterious figure lurking in the shadows of online chess forums or the hero of their local chess club. Whether strategizing at dawn or blitzing blunders at midnight, their tilt factor is commendably low, meaning they keep their cool better than many grandmasters!
Keep an eye on fork321 — because on the infinite battlefield of chess, they’re always ready with a fork, a pin, or a simply brilliant move that turns the tide.
Quick session recap
Good session — you converted sharp attacks into wins and created practical complications. A few games were lost by tactical oversights or by allowing queen infiltration and mating threats in time trouble. Overall your instincts for active play and piece activity are strong; tighten a couple of habits and you'll gain a lot in blitz.
What you did well
- Active piece play: you consistently bring rooks/queens into the attack and force your opponent to defend.
- Sharp tactical awareness when you have the initiative — you convert sacrifices and forcing sequences into concrete wins.
- Championing imbalances: you create and exploit open files and weakened enemy kings effectively.
- Resilience in complicated positions — you keep fighting instead of shying away from complications.
Key mistakes to fix
- Missed checks and back-rank tactics in time scrambles — these repeatedly decide games against you. Always scan for checks before capturing or advancing pawns near your king.
- Allowing queen/rook infiltration on the long diagonal or seventh rank after exchanges. When you trade into a position with an open file, consider incoming enemy queen/rook activity first.
- Clock management: you sometimes overthink early and rush critical moments later. Keep a time buffer for the last 10 moves in blitz.
- Over-committing to speculative sacrifices without concrete follow-up — be stricter about calculation depth in blitz-style sacrifices.
Concrete, plain-English examples
- Win vs mauricio5180 — you executed a clean kingside breakthrough and forced queen trades that left his king exposed. That’s textbook: pick a clear target, create threats, and exchange into a winning endgame.
- Loss vs alphagodel — you launched an attack but missed an enemy check / infiltration that swung the result. In those positions ask: “If I go forward, where can the enemy queen check me?”
Blitz checklist (use at the board)
- Before any capture: one quick scan — “Does the opponent have a forcing reply (check, fork, skewer)?”
- If you’re up material, simplify. Exchange pieces and avoid unnecessary complications.
- Watch move 10 and move 20: set a target remaining time (e.g., keep ~40–60 seconds for the final phase).
- When attacking, verify there is at least a 2-move concrete follow-up before committing a sacrifice.
4‑week targeted plan
- Daily (10–20 min): Tactics — 10 fast puzzles focusing on pins, forks and discovered checks. Train under a time limit.
- 3× weekly (20–30 min): Endgames — rook endgames, queen vs rook defense, and back-rank escape patterns.
- 2× weekly (30 min): Opening review — pick your main Sicilian/anti-Sicilian lines and study one model game per session; note typical piece posts and pawn breaks.
- Weekly: Play 5 blitz or 5+2 rapid games. Annotate 1 win and 1 loss immediately after each session — focus on the decisive moment.
Short tactical drills
- "Checks-only" drill: for 5 minutes solve positions but list all enemy checks before moving.
- 3-move verbalization: before you play, say opponent’s best reply out loud — forces you to see tactical resources.
- Back-rank series: do 10 positions where the goal is to avoid mate by creating luft or active counterplay.
Opening & repertoire advice
Your style thrives in sharp, unbalanced systems (e.g., the Sicilian Defense). Keep the aggressive lines you like but add one quieter anti-Sicilian to reach manageable middlegames when low on clock. Prepare one 8-move autopilot plan so you save time in the opening.
Immediate next steps (this week)
- Today: 15 tactical puzzles + 1 back-rank exercise (15–20 minutes).
- This week: review the loss vs alphagodel and the win vs mauricio5180 — annotate the turning point in each.
- Track one recurring mistake (e.g., missed checks) for the next 10 games and note improvement.
Final note
Your recent rating slope and wins show clear improvement. Focus on tactical discipline and simple time-management rules in blitz — those two changes will give you the best immediate increase in results. Keep the momentum.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| alphagodel | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| bpconti | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| hlv_chesstactics | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dvacetsekund | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| mauricio5180 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| dimoni64 | 4W / 2L / 1D | View |
| the-raghav | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| drunkenpriest291 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| arook123 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| ttttyttttt | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Girsh | 158W / 241L / 49D | View Games |
| conquester | 71W / 14L / 5D | View Games |
| johnlit | 0W / 35L / 0D | View Games |
| bubbys59 | 27W / 2L / 2D | View Games |
| ikeepchecking | 13W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2168 | 2276 | 2204 | 1775 |
| 2024 | 2180 | 2212 | 2244 | |
| 2023 | 2226 | 2218 | 2223 | |
| 2022 | 2144 | 2211 | 2153 | 1664 |
| 2021 | 2113 | 2138 | 2207 | 1594 |
| 2020 | 1831 | 2074 | 2270 | |
| 2019 | 1645 | 1912 | 1756 | 1513 |
| 2018 | 1739 | 1767 | 1536 | |
| 2017 | 1634 | 1822 | 1645 | 1965 |
| 2016 | 1370 | 1377 | 1414 | 1394 |
| 2015 | 1242 | 1402 | 1503 | 1649 |
| 2014 | 1375 | 1234 | 1517 | 1423 |
| 2013 | 1721 | 1178 | 1339 | |
| 2012 | 1318 | 1024 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 573W / 466L / 57D | 513W / 514L / 68D | 71.5 |
| 2024 | 537W / 452L / 61D | 515W / 467L / 62D | 75.4 |
| 2023 | 888W / 762L / 119D | 825W / 803L / 131D | 74.8 |
| 2022 | 641W / 550L / 94D | 600W / 602L / 76D | 74.2 |
| 2021 | 1216W / 1089L / 149D | 1190W / 1118L / 143D | 72.7 |
| 2020 | 358W / 288L / 38D | 348W / 310L / 32D | 68.4 |
| 2019 | 174W / 159L / 22D | 175W / 167L / 11D | 66.3 |
| 2018 | 166W / 139L / 26D | 152W / 166L / 14D | 67.9 |
| 2017 | 503W / 389L / 58D | 481W / 404L / 54D | 67.0 |
| 2016 | 197W / 157L / 14D | 178W / 182L / 10D | 67.7 |
| 2015 | 118W / 89L / 10D | 117W / 92L / 5D | 60.0 |
| 2014 | 66W / 89L / 7D | 67W / 95L / 2D | 61.9 |
| 2013 | 48W / 40L / 4D | 39W / 52L / 3D | 60.4 |
| 2012 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 44.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 766 | 387 | 341 | 38 | 50.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 753 | 363 | 347 | 43 | 48.2% |
| Australian Defense | 611 | 319 | 261 | 31 | 52.2% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 447 | 228 | 196 | 23 | 51.0% |
| French Defense: Guimard Variation, Thunderbunny Variation | 333 | 165 | 153 | 15 | 49.5% |
| Döry Defense | 298 | 152 | 134 | 12 | 51.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 292 | 151 | 121 | 20 | 51.7% |
| Modern | 283 | 143 | 125 | 15 | 50.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 282 | 127 | 134 | 21 | 45.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 255 | 113 | 124 | 18 | 44.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 38 | 20 | 17 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Philidor Defense | 28 | 13 | 15 | 0 | 46.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 26 | 16 | 9 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 25 | 8 | 15 | 2 | 32.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 24 | 11 | 13 | 0 | 45.8% |
| Australian Defense | 23 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 78.3% |
| Döry Defense | 20 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 55.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 20 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 19 | 5 | 14 | 0 | 26.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 18 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 244 | 119 | 113 | 12 | 48.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 206 | 96 | 97 | 13 | 46.6% |
| French Defense | 139 | 74 | 60 | 5 | 53.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 104 | 49 | 53 | 2 | 47.1% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 101 | 53 | 43 | 5 | 52.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 88 | 38 | 43 | 7 | 43.2% |
| Döry Defense | 88 | 34 | 50 | 4 | 38.6% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 82 | 53 | 26 | 3 | 64.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 80 | 51 | 28 | 1 | 63.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 77 | 34 | 40 | 3 | 44.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 25 | 20 | 4 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Benko Gambit | 25 | 13 | 12 | 0 | 52.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 24 | 8 | 15 | 1 | 33.3% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 19 | 12 | 6 | 1 | 63.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 19 | 16 | 1 | 2 | 84.2% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 18 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 72.2% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Döry Defense | 15 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 13 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 30.8% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 40 | 2 |