Frederik Svane
Grandmaster of the 64 Squares
Frederik Svane, a formidable Grandmaster bestowed with the official title by FIDE, has been steadily evolving his chess game since 2017. Known for his tactical "cellular" prowess on the board, Frederik's rating growth resembles a well-designed biological pathway — steadily efficient and impressively resilient under pressure.
Starting with a blitz rating of around 2150 back in 2017, Frederik has metabolized experience and hard work into a soar-worthy peak above 3100 in subsequent years — an evolution in rating that would make even the most adaptive enzyme envious! His tactical awareness is extraordinary, boasting a spectacular 90.97% comeback rate and a nearly perfect 98.57% win rate after losing a piece — talk about cellular regeneration!
Known for his endurance in long "endgame mitochondria," Frederik averages over 80 moves in his winning games, proving he’s no "pawn in their game." With a white pieces win rate of over 60% and a respectable 55.57% when playing black, he’s ambidextrous in his chess gene expression.
Frederik’s winning streak record is nothing short of a species survival success story, with a longest winning streak of 57 games and a current streak of 6— definitely some powerful genetic material for the heart of any chess cell.
When not busy synapsing through moves, Frederik seems to prefer operating at peak hours, with the highest win rates during late evenings—a rhythm clearly aligned with his internal circadian chess clock.
Whether facing off against longtime rivals or new opponents, Frederik masters the chessboard with the precision of a molecular biologist dissecting DNA. His performances inspire budding chess "cells" everywhere to replicate his success through dedication and strategic brilliance.
Recent Performance Overview
Frederik, you've shown impressive progress recently with a positive rating change of 46 points over the last month and an overall strong upward trend over six months (+104). Your strength adjusted win rate at approximately 50.4% reflects a solid performance against opponents of varying strengths.
It's notable that you sustain positive momentum, especially given the fluctuating trends seen in the 3-month rating slope (-32), indicating some volatility but strong recoveries.
Highlights from Recent Wins
- You effectively navigated strategic plans in openings such as the Indian Game London System and the Italian Game, showcasing strong positional understanding.
- Your ability to convert advantages in the middle and endgame stands out, often capitalizing on opponent inaccuracies or time scrambles, as seen in your rapid attacks and pressure on key squares.
- You demonstrated good opening preparation and adaptability, with sharp play leading to forced resignations in complicated positions.
- Consistent use of piece activity and control over open files helped you secure material and positional superiority.
Insights from Recent Losses
- Some of the losses involved complex pawn structures and tactical themes, especially in the Queen's Gambit Declined and defensive responses against aggressive lines.
- It appears that pressure in critical moments, including managing counterplay by opponents and handling endgame technique, could be areas to focus on.
- In a few games, timing and resource coordination (like piece coordination and king safety) were challenged by the opponent’s initiative.
- Addressing opening nuances, to avoid passive setups or falling behind in development, may improve resilience early in the game.
Recommendations for Improvement
- Opening Preparation: Continue refining your repertoire focusing on your successful lines, while also deepening understanding of your less comfortable or loss-prone openings.
- Tactical Awareness: Regularly practice tactics puzzles to stay sharp during blitz and improve spotting critical combinations, especially to counter your opponents' aggressive attempts.
- Endgame Technique: Invest time in studying fundamental endgames to enhance confidence in converting advantages and handling difficult positions under time pressure.
- Time Management: In blitz games, maintain active clock management to avoid rushed decisions, as some losses occurred when opponent pressure coincided with your time shortage.
- Post-Game Analysis: Review losses critically, focusing on the transition phases (opening to middlegame, middlegame to endgame) where control was lost.
Next Steps
Continue your streak by consolidating strengths highlighted in your recent wins, while approaching weaknesses methodically. Leverage your upward rating trends as motivation, remembering that consistent study and practice in targeted areas will elevate your blitz performance steadily.
Keep analyzing your games, perhaps focusing on complex middlegame positions where critical decisions make the difference. Stay confident and enjoy the play — your results reflect a dynamic and promising style.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sergey And. Korshunov | 7W / 1L / 0D | |
| James Mortimer | 9W / 10L / 0D | |
| Ivan Vihor Krsnik Cohar | 7W / 3L / 1D | |
| Andrey Gorovets | 2W / 2L / 1D | |
| MeroAghiad | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Nodar Lortkipanidze | 25W / 3L / 3D | |
| Vahap Sanal | 4W / 4L / 3D | |
| Shaaketh Sivakumar | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Ян Дьомін | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| zzdxer | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daniel Naroditsky | 93W / 161L / 22D | |
| Vincent Keymer | 44W / 104L / 20D | |
| Matthias Bluebaum | 56W / 77L / 14D | |
| Nihal Sarin | 30W / 100L / 10D | |
| David Paravyan | 30W / 55L / 24D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3026 | 3072 | 2708 | |
| 2024 | 3045 | 3007 | 2631 | |
| 2023 | 2915 | 3001 | 2606 | |
| 2022 | 2955 | 2880 | 2469 | |
| 2021 | 2783 | 2815 | 2338 | 2103 |
| 2020 | 2746 | 2746 | 2157 | 2084 |
| 2019 | 2388 | 2421 | 2185 | |
| 2018 | 1974 | 1725 | 1914 | 1800 |
| 2017 | 1918 | 2151 | 1978 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 832W / 400L / 105D | 798W / 368L / 163D | 92.9 |
| 2024 | 1266W / 574L / 191D | 1179W / 651L / 190D | 93.5 |
| 2023 | 1048W / 538L / 163D | 953W / 614L / 181D | 89.8 |
| 2022 | 542W / 236L / 71D | 507W / 259L / 70D | 83.3 |
| 2021 | 332W / 156L / 46D | 265W / 192L / 72D | 88.8 |
| 2020 | 590W / 386L / 116D | 538W / 411L / 134D | 90.8 |
| 2019 | 437W / 271L / 62D | 420W / 293L / 56D | 70.9 |
| 2018 | 51W / 45L / 7D | 52W / 55L / 2D | 44.8 |
| 2017 | 95W / 52L / 12D | 88W / 62L / 14D | 78.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 435 | 278 | 113 | 44 | 63.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 265 | 165 | 75 | 25 | 62.3% |
| Unknown | 253 | 134 | 118 | 1 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 248 | 136 | 79 | 33 | 54.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 246 | 139 | 73 | 34 | 56.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 232 | 141 | 74 | 17 | 60.8% |
| Döry Defense | 230 | 135 | 68 | 27 | 58.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 228 | 149 | 59 | 20 | 65.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 226 | 126 | 73 | 27 | 55.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 216 | 131 | 65 | 20 | 60.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 217 | 132 | 79 | 6 | 60.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 165 | 86 | 67 | 12 | 52.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 130 | 74 | 47 | 9 | 56.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 129 | 77 | 44 | 8 | 59.7% |
| King's Indian Attack | 128 | 68 | 54 | 6 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 122 | 75 | 38 | 9 | 61.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 118 | 81 | 31 | 6 | 68.6% |
| East Indian Defense | 116 | 70 | 41 | 5 | 60.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 115 | 64 | 46 | 5 | 55.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 114 | 57 | 51 | 6 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 21 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 76.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 18 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 94.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 11 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 70.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 8.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Chistyakov Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 57 | 3 |
| Losing | 23 | 0 |