Profile of Freude34
Meet freude34, a chess warrior whose journey on the 64 squares resembles a thrilling saga of tactical twists, endgame bravado, and a sprinkle of cheeky resilience. Since 2012, Freude34 has danced with countless opponents across bullet, blitz, rapid, and daily formats, steadily climbing the rating ladder with more ups than downs and an average win rate that hints at both skill and stamina.
Starting from a humble bullet rating around the low 1000s, Freude34 rapidly improved to a blistering peak bullet rating of over 2200 in 2020. Blitz prowess is equally impressive, boasting a max near 2110, with a style that favors sharp openings like the French Defense Exchange and the Sicilian Smith Morra Gambit—a combo that keeps adversaries on their toes and their bishops guessing.
Known for an endgame frequency of 76%, Freude34 embraces the long fights and relishes the grind, averaging about 61 moves per win—proof that patience is a virtue on this chessboard battlefield. Even when down a piece, this player’s comeback rate soars at over 81%, and they win every single game where they lose a piece but manage to turn the tide—a true phoenix on pawns and knights!
Although the occasional tilt factor strikes (at a modest 15), Freude34 keeps cool enough to maintain a roughly equal win rate playing White or Black, rarely resigning early and often outlasting opponents in complex positions. The psychological rollercoaster of chess finds a tough competitor who knows how to bounce back stronger.
The recent games tell a story too. Whether crushing an opponent with the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack or securing wins via the Alekhine’s Defense, Freude34 exhibits consistency and a taste for less traveled opening paths, much to the surprise of foes. Losses are few and far between, often by razor-thin margins or time, but never without a fight.
Off the board, Freude34's opening repertoire resembles a buffet of classics: French Defense, Scandinavian, Caro-Kann, and the spicy Sicilian Smith Morra Gambit—with over fifty percent win rates across these lines—so expect both strategy and surprises in every game played.
In short, Freude34 is the type of player who enjoys a good tussle, refuses to quit early, and loves to entertain on the chessboard with clever gambits and solid endgame technique. Whether blitzing or burning time in daily games, this username guarantees a chess experience seasoned with resilience, occasional mischief, and a hunger for victory.
Fun fact: Freude34 apparently wins every time they lose a piece... so if you find yourself ahead, watch out!
Recent performance context
Your latest rapid games show a strong knack for tactical calculation when you find the right forcing lines, and solid resilience in less clear positions. There are clear areas to tighten, especially around opening handling and king safety when facing sharp attacks. Below is constructive, move-by-move guidance to help you build on what’s working and address recurring gaps.
What you did well
- Win highlights sharp calculation and piece activity. You converted a promising initiative into a decisive finish by coordinating your queen and rooks along open lines and ending with a precise sequence. Keep looking for forcing moves a few steps ahead when you sense concrete targets.
- Defensive composure in tough moments. In the loss and draw, you demonstrated resilience and a willingness to navigate complex tactics, which is a good base for turning difficult positions into holdable games with the right simplifications.
- Openings that fit your style. Your use of active, aggressive setups (such as Bird Opening variants and related aggressive lines) allowed you to seize early momentum when your opponent isn’t perfectly prepared. Continue to cultivate understanding of typical middlegame plans that arise from these openings so you can convert early edges into winning chances.
What to improve
- Opening safety and king safety. In sharper lines and against dynamic responses, your king can become exposed if development isn’t solid. After the initial moves, ensure the king is safely tucked away or that you have a clear king-safety plan before launching aggressive pawn storms or piece activity.
- Structured planning in the middlegame. When you have initiative, it’s easy to get drawn into flashy tactical shots. Practice a simple two-step approach: (1) solidify king safety and connect major pieces, (2) identify a concrete plan on a chosen target file, diagonal, or piece maneuver and follow it for several moves.
- Trade decisions and simplifications. If you’re ahead, look for exchanges that reduce your opponent’s counterplay while keeping your winning chances. In sharp attacks from the opponent, consider safe simplifications to reduce the risk of a sudden tactical swing against you.
- Endgame readiness. Some games may head into rook or minor-piece endings. Build confidence by practicing basic rook endings and common endgame conversion techniques so you can close wins cleanly when tactical resources run out.
Opening performance at a glance
Your recent results point to strength in Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit and Slav Defense: Exchange Variation, Symmetrical Line, where you’ve achieved solid results. Other openings have limited data, so treat those results as directional rather than definitive. Consider deepening two openings you enjoy most, focusing on typical middlegame plans and common tactical motifs so you can consistently convert early activity into advantages.
Practical practice plan
- Choose two preferred openings and build a small repertoire of 6–8 typical middlegame ideas for each, focusing on piece activity, common pawn structures, and plan-based transitions.
- Daily tactical warm-up: 15–20 minutes solving puzzles that emphasize forcing moves and mate threats; review the solutions to spot any missed simpler continuation.
- After each game, write down one concrete plan that worked and one adjustment you would make next time, especially in the opening and early middlegame.
- Regular endgame practice: dedicate a short block to rook endings and basic king-and-pawn endings to improve conversion skills.
Next steps and offer to annotate
If you’d like, I can annotate a specific recent game move-by-move, pointing out pivotal decisions, alternative plans, and practical improvements for similar positions in the future. Just tell me which game you want reviewed.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| naturalprawnkiller | 4W / 0L / 0D | |
| irka_ovcharov | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| colonelguile | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| kazimdanis | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| svojne | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| hollownight1975 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| rademiovcic | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| mandolinguy | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| uwontlastlong | 73W / 58L / 3D | |
| jak777 | 28W / 58L / 1D | |
| darkeuropean66 | 56W / 10L / 1D | |
| Wagner Porto | 22W / 42L / 0D | |
| realtor82 | 46W / 11L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1879 | 1723 | 2038 | |
| 2023 | 2038 | |||
| 2022 | 2076 | |||
| 2021 | 2071 | |||
| 2020 | 2108 | 1952 | 2038 | |
| 2019 | 1653 | 1974 | 1722 | 2003 |
| 2018 | 1714 | 1904 | 1975 | |
| 2017 | 1555 | 1777 | 1813 | |
| 2016 | 1750 | 1723 | 1542 | |
| 2015 | 1691 | 1745 | ||
| 2014 | 1537 | 1732 | ||
| 2013 | 1551 | 1764 | 1090 | |
| 2012 | 1503 | 1615 | 1158 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 4W / 2L / 0D | 3W / 2L / 0D | 75.1 |
| 2023 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0.5 |
| 2022 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 92.0 |
| 2021 | 20W / 21L / 2D | 22W / 22L / 2D | 73.2 |
| 2020 | 1405W / 1171L / 94D | 1348W / 1223L / 106D | 71.3 |
| 2019 | 965W / 733L / 68D | 890W / 790L / 78D | 70.3 |
| 2018 | 3180W / 2286L / 192D | 2866W / 2488L / 220D | 64.5 |
| 2017 | 1360W / 1183L / 96D | 1258W / 1249L / 112D | 63.9 |
| 2016 | 1871W / 1713L / 138D | 1725W / 1799L / 144D | 64.8 |
| 2015 | 1063W / 992L / 81D | 951W / 1058L / 77D | 64.9 |
| 2014 | 1342W / 1302L / 94D | 1221W / 1330L / 110D | 66.5 |
| 2013 | 1022W / 944L / 49D | 839W / 1030L / 70D | 65.0 |
| 2012 | 386W / 331L / 12D | 362W / 348L / 23D | 63.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 4870 | 2507 | 2182 | 181 | 51.5% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2723 | 1495 | 1140 | 88 | 54.9% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 2690 | 1450 | 1166 | 74 | 53.9% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2633 | 1342 | 1182 | 109 | 51.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2573 | 1301 | 1151 | 121 | 50.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2480 | 1316 | 1066 | 98 | 53.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 1965 | 968 | 926 | 71 | 49.3% |
| Australian Defense | 1340 | 634 | 656 | 50 | 47.3% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1228 | 608 | 574 | 46 | 49.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 984 | 551 | 401 | 32 | 56.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 19 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 79.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 19 | 14 | 5 | 0 | 73.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 16 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| French Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Australian Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 246 | 121 | 112 | 13 | 49.2% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 246 | 137 | 97 | 12 | 55.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 191 | 109 | 76 | 6 | 57.1% |
| French Defense | 179 | 112 | 60 | 7 | 62.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 147 | 78 | 61 | 8 | 53.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 100 | 61 | 36 | 3 | 61.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 70 | 41 | 25 | 4 | 58.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 69 | 42 | 22 | 5 | 60.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 67 | 34 | 32 | 1 | 50.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 67 | 31 | 33 | 3 | 46.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Queen's Pawn Game: Torre Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 35 | 4 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |