Thomas Gempe, FIDE Master
Known online as "funbettor," Thomas Gempe is a FIDE Master whose chess journey is as dynamic and unpredictable as a Queen’s gambit, but with a bit more flair and humor. With a blitz rating that once soared above 2200 and daily games flirting with a 2500+ rating, Thomas has demonstrated mastery with both the clock ticking furiously and in the calm endurance of long games.
His style? Picture a player who rarely resigns early (only about 2%), savoring the endgame with a frequency near 69%, proving that he’s not just in it for quick thrills but loves to grind his opponents down with patient, strategic play. Thomas averages around 67 moves in his wins, meaning every match is quite the spectacle—definitely not a sprint, but rather a marathon with tactical fireworks along the way.
Ever the fighter, Thomas boasts a remarkable 84% comeback rate, and get this: he never loses after giving up a piece. Legend has it that when Thomas loses a piece, the opponent starts sweating. With a tilt factor at a surprisingly low 9, he keeps his cool better than most caffeinated chess players.
Online, Thomas’s dominance is no secret—his “Top Secret” opening repertoire has brought him over 50% win rates across all time controls, and a staggering 88% win rate in daily chess. Opponents beware: Thomas has defeated some of the toughest challengers multiple times, maintaining win rates at 100% against many recent opponents—clearly, “funbettor” is no fun for the competition.
When asked about his preferred time to play, Thomas’s peak performance occurs early in the morning and late at night (between 7AM and 1AM), possibly fueled by an endless supply of coffee and midnight snacks. His preferred days? Tuesdays and Mondays seem to bring out his best, likely an inspired post-weekend chess renaissance.
Beyond the board, Thomas is the epitome of a devoted chess enthusiast who combines talent with perseverance and a pinch of whimsy. Whether blitzing a bullet game or calmly unfolding a rapid strategy, Thomas Gempe's chess narrative continues to evolve, captivating fans and puzzling foes alike.
Overall Performance and Rating Progress
Thomas, you've made impressive progress recently with a 70-point rating increase over the last 1, 3, and 6 months. Your steady improvement is also reflected in a positive rating trend slope, signaling consistent growth and learning in your games.
Your strength adjusted win rate of approximately 51.6% reveals that you are performing at a solid competitive level relative to your opponents, maintaining a slight edge overall.
Recent Wins: What You're Doing Well
- Opening Preparation: Your use of common and solid openings—such as the Indian Game variations and Caro-Kann Defense—demonstrates good understanding of opening principles and comfort with your chosen repertoire.
- Endgame Technique: In several wins, you transitioned smoothly into the endgame with favorable material and positional advantages, effectively converting your lead.
- Time Management: Winning multiple games on time shows good clock awareness and ability to apply pressure during fast time controls like blitz and bullet.
- Active Piece Play: You often developed your pieces actively, putting pressure on your opponent’s position and creating attacking chances.
Areas for Improvement from Recent Losses
- Opening Defense: Some losses in Caro-Kann Defense lines suggest opportunities to deepen your understanding of key tactical threats and plans, especially when facing aggressive opening moves by your opponents.
- Early Tactical Awareness: In some games, early tactics from the opponent led to decisive material losses. Sharpening your tactical vision during the opening phase can help avoid falling into traps.
- Endgame Accuracy Under Pressure: A few losses happened in the later stages where precise calculation and patience are crucial. Practicing endgame fundamentals and recognizing opponent threats can reduce such mistakes.
- Positional Maneuvering: Consider reviewing moments in your losses where positional decisions could be improved, such as handling pawn structure weaknesses or piece exchanges.
Next Steps and Recommendations
- Continue to study and practice your favored openings to build confidence and handle tricky lines effectively.
- Incorporate tactical puzzles regularly to improve pattern recognition and speed in spotting critical moves, especially in the opening and early middlegame.
- Review your losses with a coach or engine focusing on key turning points to understand and prevent recurring mistakes.
- Work on endgame knowledge to enhance your ability to convert advantages and defend difficult positions.
- Maintain your strong time management skills to capitalize on opponents' time pressure in bullet and blitz games.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| carnica1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| dolfi112 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| tok111 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sjakkmagi | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| sasho2901 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| arntzmaister | 41W / 1L / 2D | |
| dave tan | 21W / 0L / 0D | |
| u0419202 | 14W / 2L / 1D | |
| alms31 | 7W / 4L / 0D | |
| noam_vitenberg | 6W / 2L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2056 | 2291 | 2345 | 2521 |
| 2024 | 1947 | 2124 | 2340 | |
| 2023 | 1842 | 2078 | 2340 | 2521 |
| 2022 | 1874 | 2037 | 2323 | 2488 |
| 2021 | 1888 | 2148 | 2290 | |
| 2020 | 1816 | 2148 | 2136 | 2404 |
| 2019 | 2158 | 2280 | ||
| 2018 | 2036 | 2230 | ||
| 2017 | 2004 | 2127 | ||
| 2016 | 1956 | 2215 | 2052 | |
| 2015 | 1621 | 1927 | 2128 | |
| 2014 | 1912 | 1965 | 1373 | 2157 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 96W / 65L / 6D | 87W / 70L / 10D | 67.5 |
| 2024 | 105W / 74L / 8D | 96W / 75L / 16D | 67.6 |
| 2023 | 254W / 166L / 21D | 221W / 195L / 18D | 65.8 |
| 2022 | 186W / 142L / 17D | 190W / 145L / 16D | 67.5 |
| 2021 | 113W / 63L / 17D | 87W / 85L / 12D | 72.3 |
| 2020 | 31W / 12L / 1D | 23W / 17L / 3D | 69.1 |
| 2019 | 13W / 10L / 1D | 13W / 7L / 4D | 74.8 |
| 2018 | 27W / 2L / 2D | 21W / 2L / 4D | 49.7 |
| 2017 | 18W / 0L / 1D | 17W / 1L / 2D | 51.5 |
| 2016 | 24W / 2L / 1D | 28W / 4L / 2D | 52.5 |
| 2015 | 42W / 35L / 7D | 38W / 34L / 8D | 70.7 |
| 2014 | 65W / 16L / 2D | 59W / 23L / 5D | 68.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 185 | 97 | 80 | 8 | 52.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 110 | 59 | 42 | 9 | 53.6% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 86 | 46 | 37 | 3 | 53.5% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 69 | 34 | 27 | 8 | 49.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 54 | 24 | 29 | 1 | 44.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 53 | 30 | 20 | 3 | 56.6% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 44 | 29 | 10 | 5 | 65.9% |
| Semi-Slav Defense Accepted | 44 | 25 | 17 | 2 | 56.8% |
| Modern | 43 | 24 | 15 | 4 | 55.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 43 | 15 | 28 | 0 | 34.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 58 | 32 | 24 | 2 | 55.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 27 | 15 | 10 | 2 | 55.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 18 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Czech Defense | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| QGA: 3.Nf3 Bg4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 2 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |