Fernando Viana da Costa - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Meet Fernando Viana da Costa, known in the chess world and on online boards as fviana, a formidable FIDE Master who has gracefully danced with the complexities of 64 squares and emerged victorious more often than not. Earning the respected title of FIDE Master, Fernando combines strategic mastery with a high level of commitment that any aspiring player would envy.
Fernando's chess journey is nothing short of remarkable. From a modest blitz rating of 1414 in 2016, this maestro has soared to impressive blitz peaks of over 2600, showcasing excellent growth and deep tactical intuition. With a blitz win count comfortably surpassing 5800 games, it’s safe to say Fernando knows how to bring the heat in fast-paced battlefields.
When it comes to bullet chess – because why not add one more adrenaline rush? – Fernando has reached peaks approaching 2759 rating points, reflecting sharp reflexes and profound opening knowledge that surely flummox opponents within seconds. And speaking of openings, Fernando da Costa favors a flavorful repertoire, excelling in various Sicilian Defense variations, the Trompowsky Attack, and a healthy dose of the Queens Gambit Declined among others.
Not merely a speed demon, Fernando also enjoys the theatrical production of longer games, averaging over 80 moves per win in blitz. This implies a love for intricate maneuvering and deep endgame battles—not to mention an impressive comeback rate nearing 90%, proving that giving up is never an option.
Off the board, Fernando might just be the perfect opponent for small talk – known for a tilt factor of 14, this player remarkably maintains composure better than most under pressure. And despite holding a slight edge when playing white, their overall win rates speak to adaptability and resilience.
To top it all off, Fernando's recent games, including a dazzling checkmate victory in the Caro-Kann Defense Exchange Rubinstein Variation at the 2025 chess calendar, are testament to a player who appreciates both style and substance. Whether outmaneuvering in blitz or strategizing in rapid, Fernando Viana da Costa is a name well worth remembering in chess circles.
Keep an eye on fviana—because when they play, the pieces don’t just move; they perform.
Progress snapshot
Your recent blitz performance shows positive momentum in the near term. To convert this into steadier results, focus on solid patterns, efficient decision making, and reducing avoidable mistakes in time pressure.
What you’re doing well
- You play active, dynamic positions and aren’t afraid to push for initiative when the situation allows.
- You handle sharp middlegames with practical resilience, keeping options open and looking for tactical chances.
- The pace of your play often puts opponents under pressure, encouraging mistakes in blitz time controls.
Key areas to improve
- Time management: in blitz, allocate a portion of your clock to evaluate critical moments and avoid rushing when the position is unclear. Aim to reach the midgame with at least a few minutes left for safe decisions.
- Opening consistency: build a compact, reliable repertoire for White and Black. This reduces decision fatigue and increases your confidence in the early middlegame.
- Blunder prevention: after a forcing line or tactical sequence, quickly verify material balance and threats before committing to a continuation.
- Endgame awareness: practice common endgame patterns (rook endings, minor piece vs. pawn structures) to convert advantages more reliably in shorter time controls.
- Pattern recognition: strengthen recognition of typical tactical motifs that arise in your preferred openings so you can spot candidates faster.
Opening choices and practical plan
You've had some openings that perform reasonably well in blitz. Consider two steps: (1) consolidate a small, dependable repertoire you can rely on under time pressure, and (2) prepare straightforward middlegame plans for these lines. For White, a solid system that leads to clear plans (such as a controlled d4 setup) can reduce early guesswork. For Black, pick 1-2 flexible defenses that you understand well and know the typical middlegame ideas behind them. This helps you avoid drifting into overcomplicated lines in blitz.
Two-week practice plan
- Daily: 10–15 minutes of tactical puzzles to sharpen quick pattern recognition.
- Blitz focus: 2 sessions per week dedicated to your chosen White and Black openings, with a simple, repeatable plan for the middlegame.
- Review after each game: write down one thing to keep (a good idea or plan you used) and one improvement (a recurring mistake or preference you should avoid).
- Endgames: 1 short endgame drill session (rook endings or king-and-pawn endings) twice a week.
Optional next steps
If you’d like, I can help you build a concise opening cheat sheet tailored to your preferred color and play style, or run a quick review of a recent game to identify recurring mistakes and concrete fixes.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| rickwilhelm1 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| grifo2003 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| knightmare_to_others | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| timmyboy554 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| dzejdoubles | 3W / 3L / 2D | View |
| Juan Sebastian Melian | 2W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Rix_pv | 2W / 2L / 1D | View |
| mi-espanol | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| siciliannajdorf3131 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| saqo25 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| labdalla | 92W / 80L / 5D | View Games |
| Tiago Pereira Rodrigues | 70W / 66L / 23D | View Games |
| Bernardo Vainzoff Sztokbant | 75W / 57L / 12D | View Games |
| terao90 | 65W / 48L / 10D | View Games |
| Leo Bispo | 52W / 37L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2638 | 2710 | 1869 | |
| 2024 | 2550 | 2617 | 1869 | 1173 |
| 2023 | 2561 | 2487 | 1201 | |
| 2022 | 2628 | 2613 | ||
| 2021 | 2674 | 2506 | ||
| 2020 | 2543 | 2457 | 1869 | 943 |
| 2019 | 2418 | 2444 | 1869 | |
| 2018 | 2100 | 2335 | ||
| 2016 | 1414 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 568W / 431L / 97D | 539W / 445L / 116D | 81.2 |
| 2024 | 606W / 384L / 84D | 531W / 438L / 94D | 86.2 |
| 2023 | 451W / 383L / 84D | 449W / 407L / 66D | 82.7 |
| 2022 | 656W / 599L / 125D | 593W / 629L / 138D | 84.0 |
| 2021 | 809W / 545L / 115D | 764W / 588L / 115D | 81.2 |
| 2020 | 625W / 521L / 115D | 601W / 573L / 113D | 81.5 |
| 2019 | 520W / 371L / 76D | 502W / 383L / 77D | 76.6 |
| 2018 | 199W / 121L / 14D | 158W / 117L / 27D | 56.4 |
| 2016 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 55.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 458 | 226 | 195 | 37 | 49.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 335 | 168 | 141 | 26 | 50.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 333 | 159 | 151 | 23 | 47.8% |
| Unknown | 314 | 159 | 152 | 3 | 50.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 301 | 147 | 134 | 20 | 48.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 292 | 159 | 109 | 24 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 278 | 136 | 96 | 46 | 48.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation | 266 | 136 | 101 | 29 | 51.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 264 | 120 | 124 | 20 | 45.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 244 | 115 | 101 | 28 | 47.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 256 | 121 | 114 | 21 | 47.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 251 | 130 | 103 | 18 | 51.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 158 | 81 | 69 | 8 | 51.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 148 | 72 | 66 | 10 | 48.6% |
| Modern | 127 | 57 | 61 | 9 | 44.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 113 | 62 | 47 | 4 | 54.9% |
| Australian Defense | 110 | 54 | 47 | 9 | 49.1% |
| Czech Defense | 97 | 46 | 44 | 7 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 84 | 46 | 34 | 4 | 54.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 81 | 43 | 37 | 1 | 53.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Capablanca Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 23 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |