Profile Summary: garicradomir
Garicradomir is an accomplished chess competitor renowned for his versatility and tactical insight across multiple time controls. Over the past several years he has steadily refined his play and built a solid reputation in fast-paced formats – excelling in both bullet and blitz while also demonstrating proficiency in rapid games.
His journey in competitive chess is marked by steady rating progression. In the early years around 2018 his bullet ratings were in the low 2200s, and as his career advanced his performances in blitz have climbed steadily into the 2400–2500 range, with rapid scores often hovering around the high 2200s to low 2300s. This upward trend reflects not only his ever–improving technique but also his ability to perform under pressure in intense, fast–paced conditions.
Garicradomir’s style is characterized by remarkable endgame prowess – with a high frequency of deep, strategic endgames that see him playing an above–average number of moves in wins and losses alike. His game statistics reveal a disciplined approach with a very low early resignation rate (just over 1%) and a comeback rate reaching nearly 90%, underscoring his resilience and mental fortitude.
Among his strengths is an acute tactical awareness, demonstrated by an impeccable win rate even in situations where he has been at a material disadvantage, and by a solid record of avoiding one–sided losses. His psychological steadiness is highlighted by a tilt factor of only 12 and relatively balanced performance between playing as White and as Black, delivering a slight edge when playing the initiative.
Garicradomir’s approach to the game is also influenced by his sense of timing. Analysis of his performances across days and hours shows that he adapts his play style to suit different moments of the day – with his win rate fluctuating according to the hour and the day of the week. Such versatility – along with his willingness to experiment with various openings, from the French Defense to the Nimzo–Indian and even specialized lines in the bullet arena – speaks to his constant drive toward improvement.
In summary, garicradomir is not only a fighter over the board but also a student of chess strategy and psychology. His impressive rating development over the years, combined with excellent performance metrics in critical situations and capacity for comebacks, positions him as a tenacious and ever–evolving competitor in today’s dynamic chess landscape.
Overview of your bullet play
Your bullet games show you are comfortable entering sharp positions and looking for active play. In a fast time control, a small miscalculation or a missed tactic can swing the result quickly. The recent results suggest you’re facing strong opponents in the quick format and there’s room to tighten decision making in the middlegame and in endgame conversion.
What you’re doing well
- You’re willing to enter dynamic, tactical lines, which is a good match for the bullet format where forcing moves often decide outcomes.
- Your opening choices show a readiness to fight for active piece activity and structural prospects, rather than simply defending passively.
- You maintain pressure in many positions, keeping opponents under practical difficulty even when you’re short on time.
Key improvements to target
- King safety and quick consolidation after the initial tactical phase. In fast games, it’s easy to neglect a safe king position when chasing a win. Verify king safety and simple recapture ideas before committing to tactical shots.
- Accurate calculation under time pressure. Practice quick line-checking patterns and prioritize forcing moves that clear the position or win material, rather than speculative sacrifices when you’re low on time.
- Endgame conversion in short games. When material or activity is equal, aim for simple, clear plans (such as trading to a favorable endgame or creating a zugzwang-like scenario) rather than chasing complex maneuvers.
- Time management. Develop a simple pre-move routine and allocate a small, fixed amount of time to each critical phase (opening setup, middlegame plan, and transition to endgame). Leave a cushion of seconds for the last few moves.
- Consistency across openings. Your openings show potential, but in bullet you’ll benefit from a narrower, well-practiced repertoire that leads to solid structures, minimizing the risk of getting lost in the complexity too early.
Opening and plan considerations
Your data indicates strengths in flexible, active openings. For bullet, consider two practical ideas:
- Adopt one or two reliable, straightforward setups for White that lead to clear plans (for example, a solid Queen’s Pawn structure with a plan to place pieces on natural squares and press on the kingside or center).
- Choose one solid defense for Black that you understand deeply, so you can respond quickly to common White setups without getting tangled in complex theory.
Focus on recognizing typical middlegame ideas after your chosen openings, rather than memorizing long tactical sequences. This helps you respond quickly and accurately when your opponent presses hard.
Tactical awareness and calculation discipline
- Build a short list of "must-check" tactical motifs to skim before each move in a bullet game (for example, back-rank threats, loose pieces, and tactical forks). This habit helps catch blunders you might miss in a hurry.
- Use a quick two-step check: first, is there a forcing move (check, capture, or threat)? second, what is the simplest continuation that improves my position or wins material?
Practice plan for the next 2 weeks
- Daily quick-solve routine: 15–20 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on common bullet themes (pins, forks, skewers, forced trades).
- Two short review sessions: after each bullet session, spend 10–15 minutes reviewing at least one game to identify one or two decision points you would handle differently next time.
- Reinforce endgames: practice a few 2–3 piece endgames that often arise after early trades in bullet, so you can convert advantages or salvage draws more reliably.
- Opening consolidation: pick two simple, solid lines for your main openings and study typical middlegame plans from those lines for quick reference during games.
Want a deeper look?
If you’d like, you can share one of your recent bullet games you’d like me to analyze in detail. I can pinpoint exact move choices, suggest improvements, and propose concrete alternatives for similar positions in the future.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| habilmente | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| luminous_maxima | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| turkish-lion | 7W / 3L / 0D | View |
| earlybird2012 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| elaisyon | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| cheiracanthium | 2W / 0L / 1D | View |
| needattention02 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Mikhael Garakov | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| fidiascyprus | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| sinisterknight8 | 1W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Luka Garic | 501W / 109L / 34D | View Games |
| Maurice Ashley | 53W / 36L / 6D | View Games |
| Dejan Dinev | 51W / 40L / 3D | View Games |
| JohnsonXi | 54W / 33L / 6D | View Games |
| Never_walk_alone | 44W / 44L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2237 | 2610 | ||
| 2024 | 2298 | 2497 | ||
| 2023 | 2231 | 2107 | 2303 | |
| 2022 | 2338 | 2342 | 2107 | |
| 2021 | 2375 | 2173 | 2277 | |
| 2020 | 2338 | 2290 | 2306 | |
| 2019 | 2405 | |||
| 2018 | 2185 | 2404 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 793W / 864L / 154D | 743W / 899L / 159D | 76.0 |
| 2024 | 1850W / 1419L / 242D | 1704W / 1599L / 230D | 75.4 |
| 2023 | 1614W / 1165L / 205D | 1423W / 1345L / 206D | 76.8 |
| 2022 | 2049W / 1612L / 235D | 1899W / 1755L / 234D | 76.7 |
| 2021 | 1217W / 945L / 95D | 1118W / 1009L / 108D | 77.0 |
| 2020 | 2065W / 1468L / 228D | 1864W / 1633L / 230D | 78.2 |
| 2019 | 1175W / 983L / 208D | 1149W / 1023L / 189D | 80.7 |
| 2018 | 848W / 600L / 68D | 781W / 672L / 71D | 77.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 4337 | 2399 | 1739 | 199 | 55.3% |
| Modern | 1482 | 741 | 671 | 70 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 890 | 487 | 349 | 54 | 54.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 851 | 429 | 389 | 33 | 50.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 793 | 418 | 344 | 31 | 52.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 723 | 360 | 329 | 34 | 49.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 687 | 367 | 284 | 36 | 53.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 593 | 319 | 248 | 26 | 53.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 573 | 308 | 242 | 23 | 53.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 562 | 287 | 238 | 37 | 51.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 1441 | 748 | 563 | 130 | 51.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 1155 | 552 | 520 | 83 | 47.8% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1128 | 522 | 505 | 101 | 46.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1083 | 515 | 464 | 104 | 47.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1019 | 452 | 482 | 85 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 948 | 438 | 417 | 93 | 46.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 827 | 423 | 342 | 62 | 51.1% |
| Döry Defense | 635 | 286 | 287 | 62 | 45.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 627 | 286 | 278 | 63 | 45.6% |
| Modern | 611 | 288 | 286 | 37 | 47.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |