Georgmeier – A Dynamic Chess Maverick
From his early days in 2013 with blitz ratings in the 2600s to his recent performances peaking at over 3000, Georgmeier has established himself as a formidable force across all time controls. Whether facing the rapid pressure of blitz or the lightning pace of bullet, his adaptability, depth of analysis, and aggressive yet resilient style have set him apart in the competitive chess arena.
Not only does his impressive rating trajectory speak to his continual improvement—increasing steadily over the years—Georgmeier’s record is also punctuated by an acute understanding of openings and an expansive theoretical repertoire. His performances in renowned systems, from the Indian Game variations to carefully chosen setups in the French Defense and English Opening, reveal a player who marries preparation with creative intuition. This strategic versatility is further highlighted by his remarkable tactical awareness, with exceptional comeback statistics and a nearly flawless win rate even after early setbacks on the board.
Apart from raw strength, his measured approach to psychology and time management plays a critical role in his success. With a tilt factor kept impressively low and consistently high win percentages across different phases of the game, Georgmeier’s calm calculation in both the opening and the endgame has earned him respect from peers and opponents alike. His career statistics, including long winning streaks and consistent performance in the endgame, testify to his mastery of both planning and execution.
Whether playing as White with a favorable win rate or adapting seamlessly on the Black side, his overall record is one of resilience and precision. The evolution of his ratings across blitz, bullet, and rapid formats not only highlights his dynamic style but also his ability to continuously refine his game in the face of world-class competition. As he faces a diverse array of opponents and pushes his limits in every match, Georgmeier’s chess biography remains a captivating story of passion, dedication, and relentless ambition.
This blend of rigorous preparation, psychological fortitude, and inventive play has ensured that Georgmeier’s name is synonymous with excellence in the modern chess world.
Constructive Feedback for Georg Meier
Georg, your recent games demonstrate a strong grasp of opening principles and active piece play, which has served you well in securing impressive victories. Here are some tailored observations and suggestions to help further elevate your performance:
Strengths
- Opening Preparation: You consistently adopt solid, flexible systems such as the Kings Indian Attack and various Queen's Pawn structures. Your choices put pressure on the opponent early and allow you to build a harmonious setup.
- Positional Understanding: You effectively improve your piece activity while maintaining king safety. In your wins, you leveraged your positional advantages well, such as strong control of central squares and timely exchanges.
- Endgame Technique: You show confidence converting slight advantages, as seen in your ability to capitalize on small material edges or positional weaknesses, converting them decisively.
Opportunities for Improvement
- Time Management: Some games show significant time pressure towards critical moments (for example moves played when your clock was very low). Improving pacing during the middlegame will help avoid rushed decisions under pressure. Consider allocating a conscious portion of time for key positions to maximize accuracy.
- Handling Aggressive Opponent Play: In your losses, you sometimes faced direct kingside attacks and tactical threats (often initiated by h4-h5 thrusts or aggressive piece placements). Make sure to double-check defensive resources earlier, perhaps with prophylactic moves, to blunt your opponent's initiative.
- Tactical Vigilance: While your strategy is strong, a few losses involved tactical oversights or missed defensive resources. Sharpening calculation, especially in sharp positions, will help prevent costly mistakes.
Game Suggestions
Review the following moments from your latest games to deepen your insights:
- Win vs. WhooopsIDidItAgain: Your queen exchange simplification on move 21 (21.Qxd5+ cxd5) was well-timed and paved the way for your passed pawns to do damage. Remember this technique of exchanging into favorable endgames when ahead.
- Loss vs. FGHSMN: Pay attention to how early misunderstandings in knight positioning and reply to opponent’s aggressive pawn pushes lead to a strong kingside attack. Practicing similar positions can build defensive instincts.
Keep up the excellent study of opening nuances and continue practicing calm, confident time management during your games. Your strong foundation and growing tactical awareness will serve as a powerful combination to raise your results.
Keep analyzing your games and stay curious about alternative ideas in critical positions. This will keep you dynamic and unpredictable as an opponent.
Bharath Subramaniyam.H Harishankkar WhooopsIDidItAgain🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Yaacov Norowitz | 405W / 275L / 86D | |
| Pranav Anand | 9W / 10L / 4D | |
| GZQSH07 | 4W / 3L / 1D | |
| Hakari | 5W / 1L / 0D | |
| Peter Michalik | 29W / 22L / 19D | |
| Antoni Kozak | 2W / 5L / 3D | |
| Nagata Nasata | 3W / 2L / 4D | |
| Maksym Dubnevych | 5W / 3L / 4D | |
| Sergey Sklokin | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| username1974 | 4W / 8L / 3D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Yaacov Norowitz | 405W / 275L / 86D | |
| Daniil Dubov | 133W / 208L / 39D | |
| Borya Ider | 175W / 78L / 34D | |
| Tuan Minh Le | 110W / 104L / 38D | |
| Daniel Naroditsky | 76W / 122L / 26D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3018 | 2595 | ||
| 2024 | 2761 | 2997 | 2598 | |
| 2023 | 2777 | 3041 | 2689 | |
| 2022 | 2749 | 2862 | 2589 | |
| 2021 | 2805 | 2932 | 2689 | |
| 2020 | 3006 | 2913 | 2651 | |
| 2019 | 2820 | 2934 | 2715 | |
| 2018 | 2865 | 2814 | 2651 | |
| 2017 | 2795 | 2759 | 2654 | |
| 2016 | 2865 | 2735 | ||
| 2015 | 2670 | 2629 | ||
| 2014 | 2660 | 2633 | ||
| 2013 | 2753 | 2598 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 232W / 220L / 83D | 192W / 249L / 90D | 93.1 |
| 2024 | 203W / 228L / 114D | 201W / 257L / 90D | 92.1 |
| 2023 | 117W / 67L / 35D | 109W / 80L / 33D | 88.7 |
| 2022 | 187W / 74L / 27D | 174W / 81L / 29D | 82.0 |
| 2021 | 316W / 154L / 78D | 271W / 176L / 104D | 84.4 |
| 2020 | 245W / 162L / 80D | 215W / 207L / 85D | 92.0 |
| 2019 | 389W / 186L / 119D | 378W / 209L / 105D | 86.9 |
| 2018 | 753W / 276L / 145D | 715W / 313L / 137D | 89.9 |
| 2017 | 349W / 222L / 78D | 308W / 232L / 107D | 96.1 |
| 2016 | 1038W / 553L / 193D | 910W / 700L / 182D | 92.5 |
| 2015 | 589W / 220L / 75D | 484W / 296L / 97D | 91.2 |
| 2014 | 277W / 157L / 41D | 256W / 172L / 45D | 93.6 |
| 2013 | 82W / 14L / 3D | 83W / 12L / 4D | 87.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 766 | 375 | 249 | 142 | 49.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 765 | 391 | 247 | 127 | 51.1% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 389 | 235 | 103 | 51 | 60.4% |
| Döry Defense | 355 | 171 | 131 | 53 | 48.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 350 | 179 | 97 | 74 | 51.1% |
| Australian Defense | 313 | 135 | 122 | 56 | 43.1% |
| French Defense | 310 | 166 | 106 | 38 | 53.5% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 279 | 138 | 89 | 52 | 49.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 271 | 121 | 95 | 55 | 44.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 235 | 123 | 65 | 47 | 52.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 573 | 382 | 148 | 43 | 66.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 571 | 337 | 186 | 48 | 59.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 502 | 303 | 154 | 45 | 60.4% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 413 | 242 | 139 | 32 | 58.6% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 366 | 229 | 99 | 38 | 62.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 322 | 173 | 119 | 30 | 53.7% |
| Döry Defense | 295 | 156 | 113 | 26 | 52.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 262 | 156 | 83 | 23 | 59.5% |
| French Defense | 240 | 133 | 93 | 14 | 55.4% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 202 | 136 | 58 | 8 | 67.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 41 | 22 | 7 | 12 | 53.7% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 37 | 12 | 10 | 15 | 32.4% |
| Australian Defense | 25 | 13 | 4 | 8 | 52.0% |
| Döry Defense | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 30.4% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 17 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 47.1% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 16 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 18.8% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 15 | 10 | 1 | 4 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 13 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 38.5% |
| Grünfeld Defense: Counterthrust Variation | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 40.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 35 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |