Biography
Clive Dziwomore, better known to his online friends as GMCLIVEDziwomore, is a chess player who specializes in speed and cunning. A Bullet aficionado by preference, he treats fast time controls as a playground where ideas collide, tactics flash, and endgames become grand finales. Since bursting onto the scene, he has carved a reputation for fearless raids, stubborn resilience, and streaks that keep opponents thinking long after the clock runs out.
In 2025 he logged heavy activity across Bullet and other fast formats, topping dozens of tournaments and racking up a personal peak of 2112 in Bullet on 2025-10-05, with a blistering 459 Bullet games in 2025 alone and 221 wins in that year. His daily play and rapid events have also showcased a versatile style, while his enduring Endgame Frequency sits around the high end, illustrating a love for long finishings when time is on the clock. For a glimpse into his journey, see his profile: Clive Dziwomore.
Playing Style
- Preferred time control: Bullet
- Endgame frequency: about 77%
- Strong endgame conversion and resilience under pressure
- Notable openings in fast formats include Amar Gambit, Scandinavian defenses, and the Italian Two Knights family, often reaching sharp, tactical skirmishes quickly
Career Highlights
- Longest winning streak: 15 games
- Peak Bullet rating: 2112 (2025-10-05)
- Bullet activity: 459 games in 2025 with 221 wins
- Top opening performance in Blitz includes Amar Gambit and multiple Scotch and Italian lines
- Profile link: Clive Dziwomore
Visuals & Mini-Highlights
Career trajectory in Bullet and other fast formats can be explored through a compact chart:
Peak ratings across formats include Blitz 1948 (2025-10-12), Rapid 1307 (2025-10-13), and Daily 1362 (2025-07-21). 2112 (2025-10-05)
Feedback on your recent bullet games
You’ve shown solid fight in fast games and a capacity to generate active play in sharp positions. The recent results suggest a positive trend over multiple months, with a noticeable rise in performance in the 3- to 6-month window. Your strength-adjusted win rate sits around 0.516, which means you are competitive with players of similar strength and have room to push above that with targeted improvements.
What you did well
- Active piece play and willingness to take space in the middlegame. When you found aggressive plans, you created practical chances to complicate the position for your opponent.
- Resilience in dynamic endings. In the winning line you maintained pressure and coordinated heavy pieces to convert the advantage, finishing with a decisive promotion sequence in a rook–queen endgame type of setup.
- Opening familiarity seems to suit you. Your performance with Scandinavian Defense and related sharp lines indicates you are comfortable entering unbalanced positions where you can dictate the pace of the game.
- Consistency across multiple time controls. Your rating history shows sustained improvement over 3– and 6–month windows, which points to solid study habits and practical decision-making under time pressure.
Key areas to improve
- Time management under bullet pressure. Several losses in fast games come from getting into long tactical sequences or missing simple threats when the clock runs low. Practice quicker decision-making for forcing moves and be mindful of opponent threats before the time hits the last minute.
- Pattern recognition for common tactical motifs. Strengthen instincts for forks, pins, skewers, and back-rank ideas so you can spot decisive tactics earlier rather than relying on heavy calculation in bullet time.
- Endgame conversion in practical positions. When you gain an edge, aim for concrete, repeatable plans (open files, active king, rook activity on favorable files) to avoid drifting into unclear endgames.
- Keep it simple when the board is chaotic. In bullet, if a sharp line isn’t clearly favorable within a few seconds, switch to a simpler, solid plan (develop, connect rooks, secure king safety) to reduce blunder risk.
Opening performance snapshot
Your openings show strong results in several aggressive and well-trodden lines. Highlights include:
- Scandinavian Defense: very active, with many wins and strong pressure in the center and on open files. This remains a solid base for fast games when you’re comfortable with the typical middlegame ideas.
- A number of other sharp choices (Amarr Gambit, Alekhine and related lines) also yield good results when you’re comfortable with the typical tactical themes and piece activity they invite.
Tip: keep a concise two-line reminder for your most-used openings to reduce decision time in bullet games.
Practical training plan to accelerate improvement
- Time-management drills (2–3 sessions per week): play 10–15 minute games with a focus on finishing within the first 6–7 moves of the middlegame. After each game, note one move where you could have saved 5–10 seconds.
- Pattern-focused tactics (5–10 minutes daily): practice puzzles that target forks, pins, skewers, back-rank ideas, and queen–rook coordination in quick-fire sequences.
- Endgame basics (3–4 sessions per week): rook endings and king activity in simplified positions. Practice converting a rook + pawn vs rook endgame and learn a few basic rules (activate the king, use the rook on the open file, win the zugzwang).
- Opening consolidation (weekly): review 2–3 lines from your main openings (especially Scandinavian themes) and note 2 key ideas for the early middlegame. Create a tiny cheat sheet you can glance at in the first 5–6 moves.
- Game review habit (after every bullet session): audit one win, one loss, and one draw with a short note on what worked, what felt risky, and what you would change next time.
Concrete next steps
- Allocate a daily 20–25 minute block for targeted practice (tactics + endgames + quick opening review).
- In your next few sessions, prioritize finishing games with clear, decisive plans rather than drifting into long tactical tangles unless you have a forced path to advantage.
- Track time usage more carefully in bullet; try to leave at least a small buffer on the clock after the critical middlegame decisions.
Want a quick, personalized review of a specific game? I can annotate the key moments from your latest win, loss, or draw in plain language. You can also share a short PGN excerpt and I’ll provide a focused, move-by-move commentary.
Profile snapshot: clivedziwomore
Example PGN review placeholder:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| doc_jag_adk | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| LonelyGoatCheese | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| romeo_sadia_iii | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| mestrejonas | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| lobillo19 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| razvan0903 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| bashkimi2010 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| shadow_forest01 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| vandesver | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| danshim917 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| tufuman | 21W / 14L / 1D | |
| pekingtiga | 11W / 18L / 0D | |
| logarifm_ua | 11W / 12L / 0D | |
| tafadzwa-tomu-1 | 14W / 8L / 0D | |
| demolisher05 | 4W / 14L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2152 | 1869 | 1307 | 1163 |
| 2024 | 1632 | 1581 | 1240 | |
| 2023 | 1644 | 1532 | 924 | |
| 2022 | 734 | 478 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 611W / 518L / 40D | 556W / 549L / 47D | 73.9 |
| 2024 | 186W / 159L / 9D | 167W / 169L / 16D | 72.0 |
| 2023 | 149W / 80L / 15D | 146W / 90L / 5D | 71.2 |
| 2022 | 16W / 7L / 0D | 10W / 11L / 0D | 43.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 68 | 38 | 27 | 3 | 55.9% |
| French Defense | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Bb4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Open Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 727 | 372 | 324 | 31 | 51.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 210 | 113 | 93 | 4 | 53.8% |
| French Defense | 156 | 77 | 76 | 3 | 49.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 129 | 69 | 55 | 5 | 53.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 101 | 54 | 46 | 1 | 53.5% |
| Modern | 92 | 49 | 40 | 3 | 53.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 91 | 48 | 38 | 5 | 52.8% |
| Czech Defense | 69 | 42 | 25 | 2 | 60.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 61 | 39 | 19 | 3 | 63.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 60 | 32 | 25 | 3 | 53.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 1 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |