Biography
Gohima is a rising chess player whose blitz battles are as sharp as their humor. Known for fearless tactical forays and resilient endgames, Gohima blends swift calculation with practical tenacity. A profile of Gohima can be explored further through their own Gohima page, where the journey from curious beginner to blitz regular unfolds with each fast, decisive duel.
Blitz Focus
Preferred time control is Blitz, and Gohima thrives in fast, high-pressure games where initiative and nerves of steel matter most.
Opening Repertoire
- Barnes Defense — a reliable Swiss-army-knife response that keeps opponents guessing.
- Center Game: Berger Variation — aggressive central play that tests early plans.
- Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit — sharp, dynamic lines for out-of-the-box play.
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — solid, flexible setups that transition to rich middlegames.
- Amar Gambit — direct, tactical choices when Gohima seeks initiative from the start.
Streaks
- Longest Winning Streak: 16 games
- Current Winning Streak: 4 games
- Longest Losing Streak: 15 games
Rivals and Opponents
Gohima has faced a wide array of opponents, with several rivals appearing frequently on the board. Notable frequent encounters include perdigao2 (70 games), pashafrmla (57), kiruha87 (49), uwS82 (47), and abdallahalkordi (45). You can explore profiles of select rivals or see summarized records in the profile section.
Peak Moments
Gohima has reached a peak Bullet rating of 2255 on 2025-07-08, reflecting a period of exceptional fast-play strength. 2255 (2025-07-08) Additionally, notable high marks include Blitz peak around 1851 in mid-2023 and Rapid peak near 1407 in 2020, signaling a well-rounded blitz-leaning talent. 1901 (2025-10-04)
Playing Style
- Endgame Frequency: about two-thirds of games reach a meaningful endgame, favoring technique and persistence.
- Comeback Potential: strong resilience with a ComebackRate of 74.61 after setbacks.
- One-Sided Losses: relatively low at 7.45%, indicating practical recovery in tough positions.
Personal Philosophy
Off the board, Gohima is as quick with a quip as with a tactic. On the board, they value practical chances and clever improvisations, especially in blitz where pressure reveals character. This playful yet focused mindset has helped translate rapid improvement into consistent results across time controls.
What went well in your recent blitz games
You showed strong attacking instincts in the most recent win, coordinating pieces well and finishing with a clean back-rank mate. Your willingness to use rooks actively on open files and to seek tactical opportunities is a solid strength in blitz where lines between survival and victory are tight.
Things to improve (practical steps)
- Reduce back-rank and king-safety risks. Action: after exchanges, quickly scan for back-rank threats and make sure your own king has escape squares or that your opponent cannot force a decisive back-rank attack.
- Improve accuracy in complex middlegames. Action: in similar tactical skirmishes, adopt a two-stage approach—first identify forcing ideas, then confirm the least risky continuation before committing.
- Strengthen endgame technique, especially rook endings. Action: study a few common rook endgames (e.g., rook and pawn vs rook) and practice clean technique to convert small advantages into wins or drawing chances.
- Enhance time management in blitz. Action: practice a quick opening plan for the first 8–12 moves, then reserve more time for the critical branching points. Use short 3+2 or 5+0 sessions to train pacing under pressure.
- Build pattern recognition with tactics. Action: commit to 15 minutes daily of focused puzzles (forks, forks with decoys, back-rank motifs) and note the typical defenses you miss so you recognize them faster in games.
Opening plan to deepen your understanding
Your openings show you can handle sharp, tactical lines. To gain consistency, deepen knowledge in a couple of strong options and learn the typical middlegame plans that follow.
- Center Game: Berger Variation — strong for active piece play. Focus on typical middlegame ideas and common replies you’ll face. Center Game: Berger Variation
- Barnes Defense — solid and flexible. Learn the typical pawn structures and how to convert initiative into advantage. Barnes Defense
- Amazon Attack — aggressive setup with tactical resources. Study how to handle typical counterplay and how to finish games when the opponent missteps. Amazon Attack
Two-week training plan (blitz-focused)
- Days 1–3: Tactics practice (15–20 minutes per day) focusing on forks, skewers, and back-rank ideas; note patterns you recognize quickly.
- Days 4–5: Opening study (about 1 hour per day) for your chosen lines in Center Game and Barnes Defense; play one blitz game applying the line you studied.
- Days 6–7: Endgame practice (rook endings, king activity) with short drills and review of typical maneuvers.
- Repeat the cycle, adjusting based on where you felt the most pressure in your recent games.
Quick practice tips for next games
- Before making a forcing move, ask: what does my opponent threaten next, and what are my forcing ideas? If unsure, switch to a safer, simpler plan.
- Keep an eye on the clock location of your opponent’s pieces; in blitz, the ability to spot a threat quickly is as important as the threat itself.
- After a mistake, stop, breathe, and identify the key turning point. Write one concrete improvement you will apply in the next game.
Notes on rating trend and progression
Blitz progress can wobble month to month. Use the trend as a cue to reinforce a steady practice routine, focusing on 2–3 areas per week and testing improvements in your games. When you sit down for the next training block, revisit your opening plans and endgame drills to keep your play resilient under time pressure.
Optional reference and enrichment
For quick refreshers, you can explore these topics as reminders of recurring ideas you want to master: Center Game, Barnes Defense, Amazon Attack
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| zendinho | 0W / 4L / 0D | |
| jatintanwar1735 | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| revnaut | 4W / 11L / 1D | |
| lolimasow | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| jorgealba1 | 4W / 4L / 0D | |
| allenwalker | 1W / 3L / 0D | |
| noob_boy15 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| crocodile2025 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| vgt187 | 3W / 2L / 0D | |
| bardom970 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| perdigao2 | 34W / 36L / 0D | |
| pashafrmla | 32W / 25L / 0D | |
| kiruha87 | 26W / 21L / 2D | |
| uws82 | 25W / 21L / 1D | |
| abdallahalkordi | 25W / 20L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2081 | 1854 | ||
| 2024 | 1982 | 1779 | 1368 | 1334 |
| 2023 | 1864 | 1755 | 1113 | 1280 |
| 2022 | 1535 | 1510 | 1261 | |
| 2021 | 1603 | 1378 | 1188 | 952 |
| 2020 | 1200 | 1064 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2898W / 2747L / 201D | 2963W / 2701L / 178D | 71.9 |
| 2024 | 4433W / 4073L / 204D | 4463W / 4042L / 202D | 67.3 |
| 2023 | 5462W / 5136L / 243D | 5445W / 5128L / 241D | 63.4 |
| 2022 | 4866W / 4590L / 146D | 4655W / 4712L / 181D | 60.6 |
| 2021 | 4585W / 4021L / 156D | 4162W / 4460L / 156D | 58.9 |
| 2020 | 10W / 14L / 2D | 9W / 14L / 2D | 50.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 19365 | 9796 | 9191 | 378 | 50.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 8480 | 4265 | 3989 | 226 | 50.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 6118 | 3217 | 2744 | 157 | 52.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 4753 | 2398 | 2261 | 94 | 50.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 4080 | 1913 | 2073 | 94 | 46.9% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 3569 | 1966 | 1549 | 54 | 55.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3196 | 1586 | 1521 | 89 | 49.6% |
| Czech Defense | 2721 | 1335 | 1323 | 63 | 49.1% |
| Indian Defense: Schnepper Gambit | 2304 | 1206 | 1031 | 67 | 52.3% |
| Modern | 2274 | 1084 | 1144 | 46 | 47.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 110 | 55 | 54 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 93 | 46 | 44 | 3 | 49.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 93 | 36 | 55 | 2 | 38.7% |
| Elephant Gambit | 69 | 35 | 32 | 2 | 50.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 58 | 32 | 24 | 2 | 55.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 57 | 26 | 28 | 3 | 45.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 52 | 27 | 25 | 0 | 51.9% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 40 | 23 | 16 | 1 | 57.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 38 | 26 | 12 | 0 | 68.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 34 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 55.9% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 258 | 139 | 112 | 7 | 53.9% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 133 | 77 | 53 | 3 | 57.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 106 | 51 | 48 | 7 | 48.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 99 | 53 | 40 | 6 | 53.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 67 | 36 | 31 | 0 | 53.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 51 | 30 | 19 | 2 | 58.8% |
| Center Game | 43 | 25 | 18 | 0 | 58.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 39 | 18 | 20 | 1 | 46.1% |
| Czech Defense | 35 | 18 | 15 | 2 | 51.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 35 | 18 | 14 | 3 | 51.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 87.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 2 |