Chess Profile: guineapig25
Since 2016, guineapig25 has immersed themselves in the chess world, tackling multiple time controls and steadily refining their play. Their dedication is evident across Daily, Rapid, Blitz, and Bullet formats, each presenting its own unique set of challenges.
Demonstrating a particular knack for fast-paced games, guineapig25 has achieved standout Bullet and Blitz ratings. Their Bullet rating soared to an impressive max of 2398 in 2024, while Blitz reached a peak of 2360 in 2023. Meanwhile, their Rapid play culminated in a strong 2110 peak, and on the Daily front they reached 1856 at their highest—a testament to their adaptability across varying speeds.
Known for their resilience, guineapig25 exhibits a high comeback rate (61.36%), often recovering even after losing material. They tend to bring games to a decisive finish, averaging around 54 moves per victory. Leveraging both White (46.61% win rate) and Black (43.57%) confidently, they frequently head into the endgame (appearing in nearly half of their matches).
From a day-to-day perspective, Saturdays see their best performance, while morning hours—especially around 6 AM—are where they shine brightest with notably high win percentages. Though they occasionally resign early (nearly 29% of the time), their willingness to fight on often sees them outlast opponents in tough positions.
Across the years, guineapig25’s playing style has become a blend of tactical awareness, spirited comebacks, and practical decision-making under time pressure. With a longest winning streak of 16 games, a solid record in all formats, and a never-say-die attitude, guineapig25 continues to refine their craft and push for even greater heights on the chessboard.
Recent Game Highlights
Brian, you've showcased solid strength in your recent blitz games, especially in your wins. You handle openings well like the French Defense and Sicilian Defense variations, where your win rates are above 45%, showing good familiarity and ability to capitalize on typical positions arising from these openings.
- Your win against LCalvary using French Defense King's Indian Attack setup highlights good control of the center and piece coordination.
- In your Sicilian Defense game against mmg1983, your aggressive play with timely exchanges gave you a strong initiative.
- Your losses often stem from difficult middle-game positions, particularly from opponents who exploit tactical weaknesses or create pressure on your king safety.
What You Are Doing Well
- Opens with Clarity: Your opening choices such as French Defense and Barnes Defense give you stable and flexible positions. Your win rates in these openings exceed 50%, indicating effectiveness.
- Active Piece Play: In your wins, you actively develop your knights and bishops early, supporting central control and pressure on opponent pieces.
- Positional Understanding: Your game flow shows awareness of when to exchange pieces and how to exploit open files and weak pawns.
- Tempo and Initiative: You’re good at maintaining initiative in mid-games, leveraging small advantages without rushing.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling Complex Tactics: Some losses come from missed tactical sequences or defensive oversights. Improvement in spotting tactical threats earlier could reduce these losses.
- King Safety: Especially in middle to late middlegame, focus more on safeguarding your king. Opponents sometimes create attacking chances that are hard to parry.
- Opening Consistency: Consider refining certain opening lines where your win rate is below 45%, like the Scandinavian and Closed Sicilian. This will help maintain solid positions against various opponents.
- Endgame Technique: Though not detailed here, improving endgame fundamentals can convert more close games from draws or losses into wins.
Development Suggestions
- Study tactical motifs regularly through puzzles to increase pattern recognition under blitz conditions.
- Review your losses focusing on moments where king safety or piece coordination faltered; identify recurring weaknesses.
- Explore deeper theory and plans in your preferred openings, especially to improve your play in less successful variations.
- Practice time management to balance speed and accuracy, since quicker moves still need reliable calculation for blitz success.
- Analyze games with a coach or engine to highlight missed opportunities or better plans in key positions.
Progress and Trends
Your overall rating trends are positive in the short term (up almost 20 points last month, with upward slopes for 1, 3, and 6 months). Though your 12-month slope shows a slight decline, this might reflect natural fluctuations or tougher competition. Keep focusing on steady improvement, and the upward trend should continue.
Your strength adjusted win rate around 50.6% indicates that you are performing well relative to your opponents' ratings. Maintaining this through consistent play and learning from recent losses is key.
With over 8,400 games played and a balanced approach across various openings, you have a strong foundation to improve further by focusing on identified weaknesses.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| canalito | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Christopher Woojin Yoo | 147W / 293L / 202D | View Games |
| Christopher Castellano | 68W / 208L / 27D | View Games |
| retro_gamez | 108W / 41L / 24D | View Games |
| biscuitandbob | 56W / 33L / 6D | View Games |
| Jason Liang | 15W / 65L / 7D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2305 | 1169 | ||
| 2024 | 2302 | 2292 | 1647 | |
| 2023 | 2378 | 2217 | 2048 | 1698 |
| 2022 | 2178 | 2241 | 1860 | |
| 2021 | 2150 | 2166 | 2048 | 1819 |
| 2020 | 2155 | 2290 | 1904 | 1862 |
| 2019 | 1432 | 2100 | 1884 | 1657 |
| 2018 | 1447 | 1889 | 1472 | 1584 |
| 2017 | 1092 | 1242 | 1248 | 1268 |
| 2016 | 1257 | 1143 | 852 | 1144 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 26W / 31L / 4D | 29W / 21L / 6D | 58.3 |
| 2024 | 86W / 59L / 14D | 61W / 77L / 11D | 44.7 |
| 2023 | 164W / 110L / 14D | 134W / 118L / 11D | 39.8 |
| 2022 | 309W / 272L / 42D | 276W / 303L / 42D | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 276W / 363L / 50D | 281W / 366L / 32D | 49.2 |
| 2020 | 382W / 427L / 69D | 370W / 406L / 71D | 48.7 |
| 2019 | 370W / 344L / 118D | 319W / 354L / 97D | 63.7 |
| 2018 | 306W / 255L / 43D | 299W / 271L / 30D | 53.1 |
| 2017 | 334W / 290L / 23D | 299W / 324L / 35D | 48.6 |
| 2016 | 569W / 562L / 35D | 515W / 606L / 38D | 39.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2079 | 872 | 1191 | 16 | 41.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 326 | 156 | 146 | 24 | 47.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 321 | 149 | 139 | 33 | 46.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 308 | 145 | 137 | 26 | 47.1% |
| French Defense | 253 | 130 | 110 | 13 | 51.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 240 | 102 | 115 | 23 | 42.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 183 | 83 | 89 | 11 | 45.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 153 | 73 | 72 | 8 | 47.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 142 | 59 | 75 | 8 | 41.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 141 | 75 | 56 | 10 | 53.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Opening* | 67 | 28 | 27 | 12 | 41.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 63 | 34 | 28 | 1 | 54.0% |
| Unknown | 51 | 38 | 12 | 1 | 74.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 44 | 16 | 26 | 2 | 36.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 37 | 23 | 14 | 0 | 62.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 32 | 24 | 8 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 25 | 13 | 8 | 4 | 52.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 22 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Scotch Game | 22 | 16 | 4 | 2 | 72.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 20 | 8 | 11 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 476 | 187 | 178 | 111 | 39.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 88 | 52 | 32 | 4 | 59.1% |
| French Defense | 86 | 42 | 37 | 7 | 48.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 60 | 32 | 22 | 6 | 53.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 57 | 26 | 30 | 1 | 45.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 47 | 17 | 29 | 1 | 36.2% |
| Czech Defense | 42 | 14 | 23 | 5 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 38 | 19 | 18 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 35 | 13 | 19 | 3 | 37.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 31 | 7 | 23 | 1 | 22.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 29 | 13 | 11 | 5 | 44.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 20 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 30.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 19 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 31.6% |
| Elephant Gambit | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Petrov's Defense | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 33.3% |
| French Defense | 11 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 36.4% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 1 |
| Losing | 23 | 0 |