Harald Schmidt - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Meet Harald Schmidt, a chess virtuoso known across the 64 squares as the ever-resilient FIDE Master. Harald isn’t just your average chess player; they have a flair for turning the tides and pulling off comebacks that would make Houdini jealous, boasting a staggering 87.21% comeback rate. Yes, if there’s hope on the board, Harald will sniff it out like a dog with a treat.
Rating and Style
With a peak Blitz rating soaring up to an impressive 2543 in November 2024, Harald has demonstrated sublime mastery in rapid tempo games. Though Blitz is their playground, they've dabbled in Bullet and Rapid formats too, flexing titles and skills without breaking a sweat. Their games tend to be marathons rather than sprints, averaging about 72 moves per win or loss with an obsession for endgames nearly 80% of the time.
Harald’s playing style includes a humble streak: they rarely resign early (0.82% early resignation rate), and are relatively unyielding, even when down a piece, winning half of those uphill battles. Both with the white pieces and the black, Harald maintains a respectable win rate over 50%, proving their mettle regardless of the color badge they wear.
Opening Repertoire - A Sicilian Love Affair
If openings were a dating profile, Harald’s would read something like: “Most serious commitment to Sicilian Defense variations.” From the Delayed Alapin to the Rossolimo Fianchetto, Harald has played hundreds of games with win rates tethered comfortably above 50%, showcasing a special knack for Sicilian strategies. They even flirt with the Pirc Defense and the Owens Defense, but the Sicilian reigns supreme.
Psychology and Peak Performance
Harald knows when to play and when to pause. The best win rates come during the wee hours of 3 AM, so if you want to challenge this master, be prepared for some nocturnal dueling. The “tilt factor” clocks in at a modest 13 – not immune to human slip-ups, but far from panic city. Their games are peppered with high drama, reflected in the intriguing mix of wins by resignation, checkmate, and even some stubborn timeouts.
Recent Battles in the Arena
Harald’s most recent victory was a classy stroke of strategic finesse against “taglit” in June 2025. The game saw Harald employing the Sicilian French Variation with expert timing, eventually winning by resignation after a well-crafted attack that left no room for the opponent to maneuver. In contrast, even greats stumble; a recent loss to “hardworkistalent” reminded us that every chess journey has its bumps.
In Summary
Harald Schmidt is a fierce and creative mind on the chessboard, blending tactical awareness, endgame mastery, and a love for Sicilian theory. Whether it’s grinding out long battles or snatching swift victories, Harald brings dedication and a touch of wizardry to every match. An unstoppable force? Maybe not always. But a formidable opponent and a respected FIDE Master? Absolutely.
In the world of chess, where kings fall and queens dance, Harald Schmidt holds their place with wisdom, wit, and a wicked sense of timing.
General Performance Overview
Harald, your current strength adjusted win rate is approximately 55%, which is a solid performance. Notably, your rating has improved significantly over the last one to three months with a positive slope of around 55, and even the six to twelve month trends indicate steady progress. This shows good overall growth in your bullet chess skills recently.
Recent Games Insights
- You have a strong record of finishing games with checkmate or forcing resignation, demonstrating good tactical awareness. For example, you executed swift mates in openings like the Slav Defense and successfully capitalized on opponent mistakes in aggressive lines such as the Alekhine's Defense.
- In your wins, you often show initiative early with active piece play and timely attacks, such as pushing pawns to gain space and exchanging pieces favorably.
- However, in losses particularly those ending by time, managing your clock better can help as several games you lost were due to running out of time rather than a purely positional disadvantage. Practicing quicker decision-making and familiarity with common positions under time pressure could improve these outcomes.
- Some losses happened in complex pawn structures and positional battles where your opponent managed small advantages well. Working on deeper strategic concepts in these positions could make a difference.
Opening Play
Your opening choices are varied and include lines such as the Caro-Kann Defense, King's Gambit Declined, and Queen's Pawn Openings. Your recent successes suggest solid understanding and preparation in these openings.
- To continue improving, consider deepening your knowledge of typical plans in each opening, focusing on critical middlegame themes and tactical motifs arising from them.
- Review your games where you conceded an early advantage and identify if opening inaccuracies led to difficult middlegame positions. Studying the yourself games and comparing with master games can provide helpful insights.
Time Management and Bullet Play Tips
- Work on refining instincts for common tactical patterns so you can respond quickly without much calculation.
- Practice pre-moving and recognizing safe swaps to save seconds on the clock.
- Review moments in recent games where time pressure affected your quality of moves and try simulating similar time constraints during practice.
Next Steps for Improvement
- Analyze losses to understand recurring mistakes or strategic weaknesses.
- Focus on improving your opening repertoire consistency and comfort with resulting middlegame plans.
- Consider dedicating time to endgame practice, as well-executed endgames can turn close games in your favor.
- Keep playing regularly to maintain and increase the positive momentum in your rating trend.
Summary
Your recent bullet games highlight your growing strength and sharp tactical skills. With continued focus on time management and strategy in complex positions, you are well positioned for further rating gains. Keep up the great work and enjoy the journey of improvement!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gunsberg | 21W / 26L / 4D | View Games |
| 123markopolo | 23W / 23L / 3D | View Games |
| Dusko Zmijanac | 17W / 27L / 2D | View Games |
| cruz29 | 24W / 18L / 2D | View Games |
| Dnk67 | 16W / 16L / 4D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2365 | |||
| 2024 | 2145 | 2326 | ||
| 2023 | 2016 | 2399 | ||
| 2022 | 2132 | 2275 | ||
| 2021 | 2132 | 2251 | ||
| 2020 | 2260 | |||
| 2019 | 2231 | 1266 | ||
| 2017 | 2249 | |||
| 2016 | 1853 | 2202 | ||
| 2015 | 1759 | 2100 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 228W / 155L / 31D | 202W / 182L / 26D | 75.7 |
| 2024 | 691W / 439L / 76D | 616W / 508L / 78D | 77.0 |
| 2023 | 180W / 139L / 19D | 168W / 166L / 12D | 74.2 |
| 2022 | 667W / 495L / 51D | 589W / 594L / 39D | 73.3 |
| 2021 | 867W / 615L / 96D | 784W / 735L / 68D | 73.7 |
| 2020 | 917W / 529L / 94D | 809W / 635L / 85D | 71.7 |
| 2019 | 136W / 91L / 13D | 133W / 94L / 16D | 69.1 |
| 2017 | 370W / 290L / 24D | 339W / 315L / 32D | 74.6 |
| 2016 | 887W / 678L / 74D | 823W / 706L / 90D | 75.7 |
| 2015 | 809W / 620L / 72D | 784W / 638L / 87D | 76.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 1046 | 575 | 419 | 52 | 55.0% |
| Czech Defense | 885 | 486 | 349 | 50 | 54.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 828 | 462 | 324 | 42 | 55.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 690 | 354 | 298 | 38 | 51.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 664 | 346 | 280 | 38 | 52.1% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 534 | 315 | 196 | 23 | 59.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 515 | 288 | 211 | 16 | 55.9% |
| Modern | 514 | 261 | 232 | 21 | 50.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 486 | 237 | 228 | 21 | 48.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 467 | 266 | 184 | 17 | 57.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Scotch Game | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dutch Defense: Blackmar's Second Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |