Hobbes Nadata
Meet Hobbes Nadata, a chess player who embodies resilience, tenacity, and a dash of unpredictable flair. Hobbes is the kind of player who, despite battling through ups and downs on the rating rollercoaster, never quits the fight on the 64 squares.
Starting out with rapid ratings swinging wildly between a humble 400s to a peak of 1055 in January 2022, Hobbes has shown a dogged determination to improve, managing over 500 wins in rapid games alone. His blitz prowess peaked spectacularly at 1167 late in 2021, proving he can make decisions faster than most can blink — or so he hopes. Bullet games pose more of a challenge, with a highest rating of 627, but many thrilling battles fought nonetheless.
Hobbes prefers the strategic dance of King's Pawn Openings and the solid, classical texture of the Petrovs Defense. He’s not shy about experimenting with gambits and defenses - from the fiery King's Gambit (where he boasts a 100% win rate in bullet!) to the trickier Philidor Defense, where the results are a bit more... educational.
Playing Style: Hobbes has been known to average around 47 moves per win, suggesting he enjoys a good, long strategic game rather than lightning finishes. Yet, when the going gets tough, this player is a master of comebacks, boasting a nearly 76% comeback success rate — a testament to mental toughness and stubbornness that could rival his namesake tiger philosopher. However, with an “early resignation rate” of almost 7%, sometimes Hobbes knows when to throw in the towel before making further blunders (or so he claims).
Chess is a 24/7 obsession for Hobbes, but his secret weapon? Playing in the dead hours around 4 AM, a time when his win rate skyrockets to 60% — presumably fueled by coffee, midnight snacks, or simply the despair of a sleep-deprived mind.
When facing opponents of higher rating, Hobbes holds his own with almost 29% wins — nothing to scoff at when you're the underdog. Against lower-rated foes, Hobbes closes the deal 75% of the time, proving he capitalizes well on opportunities.
Noteworthy recent triumphs include a gritty rapid victory by resignation against tough opponents, displaying Hobbes' strategic patience and knack for squeezing out wins even when the position looks dicey. Conversely, losses have come mostly by checkmate in hard-fought tactical battles, reminding us that even Hobbes isn't immune to the occasional blunder.
Outside the stats and numbers, Hobbes is the player who'll occasionally bumble a few openings, chuckle, and then launch one of those surprising counterattacks that make munchkins everywhere admire his cunning. A true warrior on the chessboard, Hobbes Nadata’s game tells a story of grit, growth, and just a pinch of chaos.
Because sometimes, in chess as in life, it's not about never falling, but how you pawn your one good piece and rise again.
Hi Hobbes Nadata!
You have good fighting spirit and a clear eye for tactics – many of your wins come from spotting forks, skewers and mating nets that your opponents overlook. Let’s build on those strengths while tightening a few recurring leaks.
What you are already doing well
- Tactical alertness. In the win vs Spinnif234 you found …
Nb4–c2+and later converted the extra material smoothly. Your pieces actively hunted the white king instead of trading down too early. - Open-file usage. In several victories you quickly doubled rooks or placed a heavy piece on the 7th rank once files opened (e.g. 31.Rxb8
+in the Caro-Kann game). - Staying calm in messy positions. You don’t resign after a blunder; instead you look for practical chances, and that resilience often pays off at your current rating range.
Key patterns to fix
-
Leaving the king in the centre too long when playing Black.
In your loss to gilhacker123 (QGD) you castled, but earlier games show centre-bound kings. Develop quickly, castle, then start pawn breaks. Try the “every move must help me castle or control the centre” litmus test in the first 10 moves. -
Early queen adventures.
Both of your most recent defeats came after grabbing pawns with the queen (17.Qxa8? / 12...Qxa1+) and then getting trapped.
Before capturing, run the “Three-Question Safety Check”:- Can my opponent chase the queen with tempo?
- Will I still be able to castle safely?
- Does the capture improve my worst-placed piece?
-
Under-estimating counterplay on the f and h-files.
In the Vienna Gambit loss to Orangecarrot47, Black’s queen and rook battery on g3/g2 decided the game. When you push flank pawns (…g5, …h6) be sure you are not weakening dark squares around your king. -
End-game conversion technique.
Even in wins you sometimes allow unnecessary counterplay. Practise the “two weaknesses” principle: fix one weakness in the opponent’s camp and open a second front before advancing passed pawns.
Targeted drills for the next two weeks
| Theme | Action |
|---|---|
| Safe development | Play 15 games where you promise yourself to castle by move 8. Review each game: did this help your middlegame? |
| Queen traps | Solve 20 puzzles filtered by the tag “Queen Trapped”. Aim for 80 % accuracy. |
| Minor-piece endings | Set up 4-pawn vs 4-pawn knight endgames in a board editor and practise converting with both colours. |
| Calculation | Every day, annotate one of your own games: stop at every capture and ask “what if the opposite side says no?”. Write the line; compare with engine later. |
Illustrative mini-lesson
The mating pattern that finished your QGD loss is worth memorising:
- White threatens mate on h8 the moment the queen lands on h7 supported by a dark-square bishop.
- When your opponent has bishop + queen eyeing h7/h2, keep a knight or pawn on f6/f3 or g7/g2 to blunt the battery.
Stats snapshot
Your current peak ratings:
• Blitz: 1167 (2021-11-03)• Rapid: 1070 (2025-08-01)
Activity overview:
Next steps
- Play two slow (15 + 10) games each week and annotate them deeply.
- Review one master game featuring the openings you like (English as Black, Caro-Kann as White) – focus on piece placement, not memorisation.
- Revisit this checklist monthly and update goals.
Stay curious and enjoy the board!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| orangecarrot47 | 1W / 7L / 1D | View Games |
| whynot101010 | 1W / 1L / 2D | View Games |
| brewmeisterj | 2W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| gilhacker123 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| mis_godoy | 2W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 525 | 1029 | ||
| 2024 | 547 | 403 | 936 | |
| 2023 | 377 | 973 | ||
| 2022 | 372 | 489 | 998 | 777 |
| 2021 | 314 | 1077 | 901 | 809 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 32W / 37L / 4D | 38W / 34L / 3D | 61.9 |
| 2024 | 32W / 36L / 2D | 31W / 38L / 2D | 56.0 |
| 2023 | 3W / 2L / 0D | 2W / 4L / 0D | 55.3 |
| 2022 | 89W / 81L / 10D | 85W / 81L / 7D | 57.2 |
| 2021 | 122W / 146L / 7D | 142W / 128L / 14D | 46.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elephant Gambit | 104 | 57 | 41 | 6 | 54.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 87 | 49 | 34 | 4 | 56.3% |
| Petrov's Defense | 76 | 37 | 36 | 3 | 48.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 51 | 21 | 28 | 2 | 41.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 49 | 22 | 26 | 1 | 44.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 40 | 24 | 14 | 2 | 60.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 39 | 21 | 16 | 2 | 53.9% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 38 | 15 | 21 | 2 | 39.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 37 | 16 | 21 | 0 | 43.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 30 | 16 | 13 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 52.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| KGA: Bishop's Gambit, Bledow, 4.Bxd5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 4.Bg5 Be7 5.cxd5 Nxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 11.1% |
| Elephant Gambit | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Petrov's Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| French Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 8 | 0 |
| Losing | 8 | 4 |