Mark Hoshor - National Master Extraordinaire
Mark Hoshor, known in the chess circles as hoshor, is a National Master with an enviable knack for blitz and bullet chess—think lightning-fast decisions paired with strategic brilliance. With a peak blitz rating of 2391 achieved in early 2022, Mark's chess journey could easily be mistaken for a thrilling roller coaster ride through the ranks, peppered with moments of triumph and the occasional humbling defeat.
Playing Style and Expertise
Mark’s chess style is a blend of dogged determination and tactical wizardry. Boasting an impressive come-back rate of 82.2%, this player knows how to turn a blunder into a blinder. Mark’s love for the endgame is clear, engaging in one of the highest endgame frequencies recorded among his contemporaries (over 84%). An average winning game lasts around 76 moves, so patience and stamina are definitely part of the package.
Quick to spot opportunities and not shy to resign early when the position looks grim (with an early resignation rate under 0.4%), Mark balances pragmatism and audacity with finesse.
Stats That Tell a Story
- Total blitz games: Over 25,000 with a solid taste for the Top Secret opening, leading to a 57% win rate in this favorite battlefield.
- Daily chess win rate: An enviable 74.2%, showing that when there's more time on the clock, Hoshor’s precision is on full display.
- Substantial experience with bullet chess; not for the faint of heart but certainly a domain where hoshor thrives with a peak bullet rating surpassing 2280.
- Longest winning streak: A staggering 38 games in a row, proving Mark knows how to build momentum and keep it.
- Favorite days and hours to play: Mondays and the morning hours (around 9 AM) seem to bring out Mark’s best moves — maybe fueled by coffee and fresh brain cells.
Tact and Tenacity in Action
Mark’s psychological resilience is noteworthy. Despite a tilt factor of 10 (that's fairly modest for a competitive player), their ability to maintain performance after losing a piece (winning over half the games after such setbacks) tells a tale of grit and resolve. If blitz chess were a battlefield, Mark’s the general who never surrenders without a fight — even when the chips are down.
Recent Chess Adventures
In one of his latest victories, Mark demonstrated masterful handling of the Sicilian Defense: Lasker-Dunne Attack, triumphing by resignation after an intense series of maneuvers. Always ready to seize the initiative, his opponents learn quickly that time pressure is their enemy as much as his skill.
Mark in a Nutshell
With a playful username like hoshor, one might expect a quiet player, but Mark defies stereotypes. A National Master who mixes striking openings with deep endgame knowledge, they combine solid game fundamentals with tactical fireworks. Expect a calculated pace, unexpected comebacks, and a friendly but fierce competitor right down to the last tick on the clock.
Chess fans and foes alike watch as hoshor continues to chase new peaks, proving that even in a game of sixty-four squares, there’s room for personality, humor, and unyielding passion.
Overall Performance Highlights
Mark, your recent games demonstrate solid skills with a strong win record and effective use of various openings. Your rating has shown a substantial climb over the last six months, which speaks to your improving strategic understanding and game execution. Your experience with aggressive openings like the Amar Gambit and Nimzo-Larsen Attack is a particular strength, contributing to more than 60% win rates in those lines.
Strengths in Recent Games
- Opening Preparation: You play a good variety of openings, and your win rates show confidence in lines such as the Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Bird Opening. Continuing to deepen your knowledge in these can keep enhancing your success.
- Attack and Initiative: Games like the victory using the Amar Gambit indicate your willingness to seize the initiative early, an excellent trait for blitz games.
- Endgame Technique: In your wins, the transition to endgame seems well handled, showing your ability to convert small advantages efficiently.
- Time Management: Despite losing some games on time, overall you have maintained good clock control, highlighting sound decision-making speed crucial in blitz.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling Defensive Positions: Some losses indicated difficulty in countering aggressive opponent strategies, particularly when under pressure. Strengthening defensive techniques and calculating forced lines can improve resilience.
- Time Pressure Management: A few losses were due to time exhaustion. Practicing to make quicker, reliable decisions in complex positions might reduce these losses.
- Positional Consistency: Focusing on positional play will balance your attacking style, giving you more tools to exploit weaknesses and avoid overextension.
- Draw and Loss Analysis: Review positions where games were drawn or lost, especially openings like the Modern and Czech Defense where your win rates are just above or below 50%. Analyzing these can reveal patterns and tactical improvements.
Training Recommendations
- Study classic games using your favored openings like Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Amar Gambit to understand plans and typical tactics deeply.
- Implement timed practice sessions where you deliberately focus on avoiding time trouble, improving calculation speed under pressure.
- Engage in endgame studies regularly to enhance precision when converting advantages.
- Analyze your recent losses with software or a coach to pinpoint missed opportunities in defensive and counterattacking scenarios.
- Balance your aggressive style with positional understanding exercises to maintain sustainability in tougher matches.
Next Steps
Keep focusing on your opening repertoire and take advantage of your recent rating incline. Review your recent games with a special eye on avoiding time trouble and improving defense. This will build on your current momentum. Given your solid base and continuous growth, small adjustments can lead to strong rating gains and more consistent success in blitz play.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| totho | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| cahndeso13 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| bddawuod | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ghis42 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| slavarus45 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| ancarmaran | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| krakenreleased | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| imlovingit | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| gdm89 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| alistowi | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gunsberg | 95W / 138L / 16D | |
| vakus | 124W / 65L / 12D | |
| novebg | 71W / 84L / 10D | |
| rainforest22 | 117W / 41L / 3D | |
| sant_chess | 65W / 24L / 18D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2196 | 2296 | 2205 | 2127 |
| 2024 | 2185 | 1790 | 2206 | 2167 |
| 2023 | 2105 | 2266 | 1893 | 2179 |
| 2022 | 2142 | 1947 | 1961 | 2157 |
| 2021 | 2069 | 1918 | 2254 | |
| 2020 | 2013 | 2211 | 2278 | |
| 2019 | 2017 | 2232 | 2045 | 2218 |
| 2018 | 2111 | 2129 | ||
| 2017 | 2120 | 2180 | 1999 | |
| 2016 | 2041 | 2203 | 2050 | |
| 2015 | 2104 | 2121 | 2001 | 2169 |
| 2014 | 2119 | 2177 | 2102 | |
| 2013 | 2016 | 2093 | 2056 | |
| 2012 | 1953 | 2189 | 1983 | |
| 2011 | 1960 | 2143 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1095W / 555L / 110D | 1047W / 636L / 93D | 79.6 |
| 2024 | 730W / 451L / 91D | 696W / 507L / 80D | 83.1 |
| 2023 | 183W / 80L / 21D | 198W / 68L / 17D | 79.2 |
| 2022 | 851W / 383L / 77D | 801W / 422L / 74D | 79.5 |
| 2021 | 737W / 360L / 74D | 721W / 384L / 70D | 80.1 |
| 2020 | 314W / 151L / 42D | 337W / 156L / 35D | 75.1 |
| 2019 | 1205W / 463L / 96D | 1145W / 541L / 103D | 77.0 |
| 2018 | 258W / 120L / 20D | 236W / 135L / 23D | 78.7 |
| 2017 | 126W / 83L / 12D | 119W / 80L / 16D | 82.9 |
| 2016 | 276W / 200L / 32D | 249W / 238L / 31D | 84.4 |
| 2015 | 753W / 663L / 140D | 734W / 688L / 120D | 85.4 |
| 2014 | 629W / 523L / 120D | 620W / 524L / 123D | 85.1 |
| 2013 | 570W / 403L / 96D | 567W / 444L / 73D | 83.4 |
| 2012 | 623W / 283L / 80D | 582W / 321L / 82D | 81.4 |
| 2011 | 149W / 49L / 14D | 150W / 52L / 8D | 71.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 4557 | 2929 | 1389 | 239 | 64.3% |
| Modern | 2966 | 1574 | 1207 | 185 | 53.1% |
| Australian Defense | 1829 | 1059 | 653 | 117 | 57.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1761 | 1152 | 514 | 95 | 65.4% |
| Czech Defense | 1349 | 719 | 549 | 81 | 53.3% |
| Modern Defense | 1206 | 599 | 498 | 109 | 49.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 1013 | 611 | 335 | 67 | 60.3% |
| Bird Opening | 762 | 514 | 206 | 42 | 67.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 723 | 418 | 253 | 52 | 57.8% |
| English Opening | 654 | 388 | 223 | 43 | 59.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 125 | 95 | 12 | 18 | 76.0% |
| Bird Opening | 87 | 52 | 19 | 16 | 59.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 78 | 58 | 12 | 8 | 74.4% |
| Australian Defense | 75 | 46 | 21 | 8 | 61.3% |
| Modern | 60 | 38 | 8 | 14 | 63.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 51 | 44 | 5 | 2 | 86.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 45 | 33 | 6 | 6 | 73.3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 34 | 24 | 3 | 7 | 70.6% |
| English Opening | 34 | 27 | 4 | 3 | 79.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 188 | 107 | 71 | 10 | 56.9% |
| Australian Defense | 117 | 69 | 41 | 7 | 59.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 107 | 65 | 38 | 4 | 60.8% |
| Czech Defense | 83 | 41 | 36 | 6 | 49.4% |
| Modern Defense | 80 | 37 | 33 | 10 | 46.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 34 | 19 | 14 | 1 | 55.9% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Leningrad Variation | 33 | 21 | 10 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Slav Defense | 31 | 19 | 12 | 0 | 61.3% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 29 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 58.6% |
| Benko Gambit | 22 | 13 | 8 | 1 | 59.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 12 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 20.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 38 | 9 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |