Lajos Istvandi (aka impapa) - International Master
Meet Lajos Istvandi, an International Master recognized by FIDE, whose chess prowess strikes like a well-aimed queen’s gambit — graceful, strategic, and occasionally leaving opponents wondering if they accidentally walked into a trap disguised as a friendly game.
Rating Rollercoaster & Notable Stats
Lajos’s chess rating journey is nothing short of exciting. Starting from modest beginnings in bullet chess, with a max rating of 1574 in 2014, Lajos rapidly (pun intended) ascended the ranks. By 2024, their bullet rating soared to an impressive 2243, and in rapid chess, the rating peaked at 2408 the same year. Blitz chess, Lajos’s playground of choice through the years, saw a top rating of 2408 in 2021.
With over 2,000 blitz games under their belt, a win record boasting more than 1,400 victories, and a seasoned tactician who boasts a comeback rate of 87.45%, Lajos has proven that resilience and sharp tactics go hand-in-hand. And hey, winning after losing a piece 100% of the time? That’s not just talent, that’s legendary grit... or sheer stubbornness.
Playing Style
Lajos shows a penchant for late-game drama, with an endgame frequency of 73.5%, meaning they rarely let games fizzle out prematurely. They average nearly 71 moves per win, demonstrating patience and precision (or possibly enjoying the mental marathon). The victory rates reveal a slight advantage when playing white with 53.46% winning games, showing the classic "first-move mojo." Black pieces? No problem, with a solid 50.11% win rate.
Opponent Dynamics & Streaks
Lajos’s opponents often find themselves staring at the backs of their king as he runs for safety. Famous for a longest winning streak of 15 games, this master is no stranger to momentum. The current winning streak at the time of profile stands strong at 3 games.
Facing the likes of “mkapho73” and “cruz29” repeatedly, Lajos keeps the rivalry spicy: from friendly victories to hard-fought battles. Interestingly, some opponents fall to Lajos every single time, which makes you wonder — are they just very unlucky, or has Lajos secretly installed chess bots disguised as humans?
A Byte-Sized Secret
Always ready with an early resignation rate of just 0.95%, Lajos doesn’t believe in giving up easily — only when the position screams checkmate louder than the coffee timer.
Off the Board
When Lajos isn’t conquering the 64 squares, they might be found amusingly predicting Friday evening’s win rate with an optimistic 54.95% or boldly playing blitz matches at 23:00 hours—when apparently, their win rate shoots up to a sizzling 71.43%. Late-night victory dance, anyone?
Summary
In short, Lajos Istvandi is a chess warrior with a brain wired for deep strategy, lightning-quick tactical shots, and an unwavering fighting spirit. Whether it’s bullet, blitz, or rapid, when you face Lajos, expect to fight for every move, because they’re far from your average next-door chess player—they’re a master of the dance between mind and might.
Hi Lajos!
Great work maintaining a strong blitz rating around 2408 (2021-12-11). Your games show dynamic attacking ideas and a good feel for initiative. Here is some personalised feedback, based on your latest streak of games.
What you are already doing well
- Active piece play. In many wins you activate rooks on the third rank (e.g. 23.Rh3–Rg3 in your win vs. hvdl) and find tactical blows such as 22.Bxg7 or 22.Rxf7+ against the Pirc.
- Opening versatility. You handle 1.e4 (Petroff, Sicilian) and 1.d4 (Benoni-type, Indian Game) with confidence, making you harder to prepare for.
- Practical calculation speed. Short time-control victories, often won with 30 – 40 seconds left, show solid tactical eyesight.
Key areas to focus on next
- Time management.
• Four of your last six losses were “lost on time” in roughly equal or winning positions.
• Aim to reach move 20 with ≥ 50 % of your initial clock. Try “touch, calculate once, play” for non-critical replies.
• Practise a 2-second scan routine: checks, captures, threats, every move. - Early pawn thrusts (h- & g-pawns).
• In several defeats (e.g. vs. Federico Gonzalez Gastellú and NguyenXuanVinh) the advance h4/g4 created weaknesses your opponent later exploited.
• Ask “What is my worst-placed piece?” before pushing wing pawns; often improving that piece is safer. - Conversion technique.
• From a pawn up against MiamiShark you still flagged. Converting +1 positions quickly (trading into simple endgames) will boost your score.
• Drill technical endings (rook + pawn vs. rook, basic bishop endings); 5-minute end-game studies can replace one tactics session per day. - Central counterplay as Black.
• In the Scotch loss to black_apalachi you allowed e4-e5 breaks while pieces were undeveloped. Against 1.e4 consider solidifying with …d5 in one go or switching to a repertoire that cuts early central tension (e.g. the Caro-Kann). - Pattern recognition: opposite-side castling.
• Your attacking intuition is strong, but sometimes you forget the opponent’s counterplay. Create a rule-of-thumb list (open files, tempo counts, king-hiding squares) and review after each opposite-side game.
Mini exercise
Replay the critical sequence from your recent loss and find an improvement for White on move 31:
Suggested study plan (weekly)
- 3×15 min: Clock discipline drills (play bullet with the sole goal of reaching move 30 above 30 s).
- 3×20 min: Endgame flashcards (rook endings & basic pawn structures).
- 2×30 min: Review one loss & one win; write a sentence on why each critical move was made.
- 1×30 min: Opening maintenance – pick one line you actually faced this week and update notes.
Progress trackers
Keep an eye on your activity graphs to spot fatigue patterns:
Keep up the attacking spirit, Lajos, but add a layer of clock control and end-game calm—you will see your rating climb fast. Feel free to send me any game you would like analysed in depth. Good luck!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mkapho73 | 6W / 8L / 0D | |
| cruz29 | 3W / 4L / 0D | |
| MI Carlos E. Burgos Figueroa | 1W / 6L / 0D | |
| joman_m | 3W / 4L / 0D | |
| ptirius | 6W / 1L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2243 | 2406 | ||
| 2023 | 2026 | 2328 | 2306 | |
| 2022 | 2097 | |||
| 2021 | 2231 | |||
| 2020 | 2317 | |||
| 2019 | 1956 | 2313 | ||
| 2018 | 1958 | 2015 | ||
| 2017 | 2036 | 2201 | ||
| 2016 | 2051 | 2242 | ||
| 2015 | 1967 | |||
| 2014 | 1556 | 1994 | ||
| 2011 | 1898 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 67W / 29L / 7D | 56W / 33L / 12D | 71.4 |
| 2023 | 162W / 118L / 13D | 151W / 126L / 9D | 67.6 |
| 2022 | 134W / 109L / 13D | 116W / 125L / 22D | 69.3 |
| 2021 | 17W / 16L / 4D | 15W / 16L / 3D | 67.2 |
| 2020 | 168W / 119L / 30D | 154W / 147L / 18D | 73.1 |
| 2019 | 95W / 64L / 8D | 93W / 57L / 13D | 70.4 |
| 2018 | 16W / 13L / 2D | 16W / 13L / 4D | 67.3 |
| 2017 | 28W / 13L / 3D | 20W / 24L / 2D | 72.0 |
| 2016 | 232W / 224L / 30D | 231W / 213L / 34D | 74.1 |
| 2015 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 98.0 |
| 2014 | 8W / 3L / 0D | 8W / 3L / 0D | 76.0 |
| 2011 | 22W / 5L / 1D | 22W / 4L / 0D | 50.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 24 | 13 | 9 | 2 | 54.2% |
| Australian Defense | 24 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 62.5% |
| Scotch Game | 23 | 17 | 6 | 0 | 73.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 23 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 56.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 19 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 47.4% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 19 | 8 | 10 | 1 | 42.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 19 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 57.9% |
| Döry Defense | 17 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 52.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 14 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 33.3% |
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 147 | 75 | 67 | 5 | 51.0% |
| Döry Defense | 117 | 64 | 47 | 6 | 54.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 112 | 53 | 57 | 2 | 47.3% |
| Indian Defense: Przepiorka Variation | 97 | 44 | 47 | 6 | 45.4% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 78 | 39 | 29 | 10 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 77 | 33 | 39 | 5 | 42.9% |
| Australian Defense | 57 | 28 | 23 | 6 | 49.1% |
| East Indian Defense | 53 | 31 | 20 | 2 | 58.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 50 | 26 | 20 | 4 | 52.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 45 | 31 | 12 | 2 | 68.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 3 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |