Pavel Ponkratov
Grandmaster of the 64 squares
Pavel Ponkratov is no ordinary chess player — he's a Grandmaster, a title bestowed upon those who have stared into the abyss of chess complexities and winked back. Born with a seemingly built-in chess radar, Pavel has dazzled opponents across rapid, blitz, and bullet formats, leaving behind a trail of brilliant moves and, occasionally, a few scratching heads.
Known in the online realms as Infernal_XaM, Pavel’s style embodies tactical brilliance and psychological resilience. His comeback rate after losing a piece is a staggering 86.7%, proving he's not just chess-smart, but also a master of grit and wit under pressure. If chess were a dance, Pavel would be the one leading with unexpected twirls and cheeky footwork.
Rating Highlights
- Peak Rapid rating: 2885 (July 2019)
- Peak Blitz rating: 3005 (July 2020) — yes, breaking through the 3000 barrier!
- Peak Bullet rating: 2994 (March 2023) — blink and you’ll miss those lightning moves.
Statistics Snapshot
Pavel's impressive record in blitz is a testament to his sharp reflexes and quick thinking, with over 2,000 wins logged. In bullet chess — where speed is king — he boasts a win rate north of 55%, making opponents wonder if he's secretly a chess robot in disguise.
With an average game lasting around 79 moves for victories, Pavel’s games are often marathons of mental endurance rather than quick sprints, showing his love for intricate endgames and strategic battles. His endgame frequency is a whopping 84.75%, so if you're facing him, be ready to fight until the very end!
Anecdote
Despite a tilt factor of 11 (which means sometimes things get spicy), Pavel’s best time to play is at 3 AM sharp — the witching hour where grandmasters awaken and calculate worlds ahead.
Whether he's grinding in rapid games or firing off bullets faster than you can say "checkmate," Pavel Ponkratov continues to push his limits, proving on and off the board that chess is not just a game, but a relentless adventure.
You can check out his latest crafty victory in English Opening Caro-Kann Defensive System — where after a precise sequence of moves, his opponent threw in the towel, acknowledging the grandmaster's inexorable pursuit of glory.
Hi Pavel!
First of all, congratulations on maintaining a 2500-level blitz performance and on the high rate of decisive games you produce. Below is a targeted, practical report based on your latest encounters.
Quick Strength Recap
- Dynamic play: your attacking instincts (e.g. 22.h6! vs vugarrasulov) often create practical pressure.
- Wide opening range: English, King’s Indian Attack, Najdorf, Caro–Kann Advance, QGD etc., making you hard to prepare for.
- Good conversion when you get a stable extra pawn; win vs Ihor Samunenkov is a textbook central breakthrough.
Priority Fixes
- King safety in “soft” structures
Twice you entered positions with queens on and a weakened king (losses vs Alexandr Predke and GOGIEFF). In both games you voluntarily played h3/h4 and opened dark-squares while queens were still on the board.
Action: Before playing pawn moves around your king, run a three-question blunder check: “What changes on the g3/c3 & f-files? Does it leave a hook? Can the opponent sacrifice to open lines?” A 5-second ritual will eliminate many crashes. - Critical moment calculation depth
In your most recent loss you missed 25…Rf5! and the follow-up …Rh4 which turned the game. The engine shows that after 25.Qb7 you had 25…Kf8 26.Rd1 to hold. You spent only 35 seconds on 25.Qb7.
Action: Each game contains ~2–3 “slow-down positions.” Use an extra 45 seconds there even in 3|2—your clock management statistics show you usually keep >1:30 unused at the end. - End-game conversion vs. stubborn defense
The marathon vs Remontada2017 reached a theoretically won rook+rook-pawn vs rook ending, yet slipped away. The technical win involves the “third-rank cut-off” manoeuvre (Rg3/Rg4 etc.).
Action: Spend 30 minutes with the drills “R+P vs R — side pawn” and “Lucena with checks” in Chess.com’s end-game trainer.
Opening Radar
| Colour | Repertoire note | Quick tip |
|---|---|---|
| White | English / KIA / 1.e4 sidelines | Against 1…c5 Najdorf you choose the early a4&Be2 plan; score −2 in last 5. Consider switching to the fashionable 9.g4 “modern English attack”. |
| Black | Caro–Kann & King’s Indian | You meet Exchange-KID with …a5/…b5 ideas nicely (win vs sokidze) but in Caro–Kann Advance 4.dxc5 you allowed the forcing line 5.Qg4 h5 6.Qg3 h4 leaving c5 and h4 weak. Review the quieter 5…Ne7!? systems. |
Illustrative Snippet
The critical tactical slip vs Predke:
Stopping here for 30 seconds to spot …Rf5 would have changed the result.
Training Block for the Next Two Weeks
- 15 puzzles/day rated 2500–2700; tag every miss (pin, zwischenzug, zugzwang etc.).
- 3 end-game drills/session: rook vs rook+f-/side pawn, and queen vs rook side checks.
- Play two 10|0 games focusing on no early pawn moves in front of your king. Annotate manually, then engine.
Stats & Motivation
Your historical peak: 3005 (2020-07-14) — within 20 points of GM mark!
Here’s a quick visual of when you score best:
(hint: your tactical vision seems sharper after 14:00 UTC).Final Word
You are already playing at a strong IM level. Fixing the single issue of pawn pushes around your king and polishing a handful of technical endings can easily yield +40 rating points. Stay disciplined in those critical moments and the results will follow.
Good luck, train hard, and keep the games sharp!
— Your Chess Coach
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| David Paravyan | 25W / 29L / 8D | |
| Sanan Sjugirov | 17W / 27L / 14D | |
| pKiLz5Rn9b | 19W / 29L / 8D | |
| Artur Gabrielian | 32W / 16L / 6D | |
| Sodoma Gomora | 29W / 20L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 2873 | 2544 | ||
| 2023 | 2925 | 2862 | 2511 | |
| 2022 | 2863 | 2595 | ||
| 2021 | 2817 | 2936 | ||
| 2020 | 2852 | 2815 | 2261 | |
| 2019 | 2729 | 2832 | 2691 | |
| 2018 | 2713 | 2859 | ||
| 2017 | 2660 | 2699 | ||
| 2016 | 2585 | 2662 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 9W / 8L / 7D | 7W / 9L / 6D | 97.5 |
| 2023 | 44W / 19L / 9D | 29W / 28L / 9D | 83.8 |
| 2022 | 69W / 44L / 19D | 56W / 52L / 22D | 94.7 |
| 2021 | 21W / 6L / 0D | 14W / 9L / 4D | 91.4 |
| 2020 | 281W / 128L / 52D | 243W / 177L / 43D | 84.2 |
| 2019 | 348W / 260L / 82D | 327W / 282L / 86D | 83.7 |
| 2018 | 349W / 224L / 60D | 301W / 250L / 67D | 81.9 |
| 2017 | 338W / 214L / 43D | 307W / 227L / 45D | 86.8 |
| 2016 | 139W / 48L / 13D | 143W / 41L / 13D | 83.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 14 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 42.9% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 42.9% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Petrov's Defense | 178 | 96 | 57 | 25 | 53.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 177 | 82 | 75 | 20 | 46.3% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense | 127 | 68 | 39 | 20 | 53.5% |
| Modern | 110 | 65 | 32 | 13 | 59.1% |
| Döry Defense | 91 | 47 | 29 | 15 | 51.6% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 74 | 35 | 27 | 12 | 47.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 73 | 37 | 27 | 9 | 50.7% |
| Slav Defense | 73 | 41 | 26 | 6 | 56.2% |
| Philidor Defense | 71 | 33 | 33 | 5 | 46.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 64 | 34 | 22 | 8 | 53.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 75 | 49 | 22 | 4 | 65.3% |
| Döry Defense | 58 | 30 | 23 | 5 | 51.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 51 | 34 | 14 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 42 | 22 | 17 | 3 | 52.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 39 | 21 | 18 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 33 | 17 | 15 | 1 | 51.5% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 31 | 17 | 12 | 2 | 54.8% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 28 | 15 | 11 | 2 | 53.6% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 27 | 13 | 10 | 4 | 48.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 26 | 18 | 7 | 1 | 69.2% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 25 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |