Avatar of Pavel Ponkratov

Pavel Ponkratov GM

Username: Infernal_XaM

Playing Since: 2016-06-08 (Inactive)

Wow Factor: ♟♟

Chess.com

Rapid: 2544
115W / 119L / 61D
Blitz: 2873
2081W / 1350L / 412D
Bullet: 2925
786W / 537L / 89D

Pavel Ponkratov

Grandmaster of the 64 squares

Pavel Ponkratov is no ordinary chess player — he's a Grandmaster, a title bestowed upon those who have stared into the abyss of chess complexities and winked back. Born with a seemingly built-in chess radar, Pavel has dazzled opponents across rapid, blitz, and bullet formats, leaving behind a trail of brilliant moves and, occasionally, a few scratching heads.

Known in the online realms as Infernal_XaM, Pavel’s style embodies tactical brilliance and psychological resilience. His comeback rate after losing a piece is a staggering 86.7%, proving he's not just chess-smart, but also a master of grit and wit under pressure. If chess were a dance, Pavel would be the one leading with unexpected twirls and cheeky footwork.

Rating Highlights

  • Peak Rapid rating: 2885 (July 2019)
  • Peak Blitz rating: 3005 (July 2020) — yes, breaking through the 3000 barrier!
  • Peak Bullet rating: 2994 (March 2023) — blink and you’ll miss those lightning moves.

Statistics Snapshot

Pavel's impressive record in blitz is a testament to his sharp reflexes and quick thinking, with over 2,000 wins logged. In bullet chess — where speed is king — he boasts a win rate north of 55%, making opponents wonder if he's secretly a chess robot in disguise.

With an average game lasting around 79 moves for victories, Pavel’s games are often marathons of mental endurance rather than quick sprints, showing his love for intricate endgames and strategic battles. His endgame frequency is a whopping 84.75%, so if you're facing him, be ready to fight until the very end!

Anecdote

Despite a tilt factor of 11 (which means sometimes things get spicy), Pavel’s best time to play is at 3 AM sharp — the witching hour where grandmasters awaken and calculate worlds ahead.

Whether he's grinding in rapid games or firing off bullets faster than you can say "checkmate," Pavel Ponkratov continues to push his limits, proving on and off the board that chess is not just a game, but a relentless adventure.

You can check out his latest crafty victory in English Opening Caro-Kann Defensive System — where after a precise sequence of moves, his opponent threw in the towel, acknowledging the grandmaster's inexorable pursuit of glory.

Proudly holding the Grandmaster title, Pavel Ponkratov is a force to be reckoned with, in chess and in wit. Beware, your king might just be the next to go down.

Coach's Avatar

Hi Pavel!

First of all, congratulations on maintaining a 2500-level blitz performance and on the high rate of decisive games you produce. Below is a targeted, practical report based on your latest encounters.

Quick Strength Recap

  • Dynamic play: your attacking instincts (e.g. 22.h6! vs vugarrasulov) often create practical pressure.
  • Wide opening range: English, King’s Indian Attack, Najdorf, Caro–Kann Advance, QGD etc., making you hard to prepare for.
  • Good conversion when you get a stable extra pawn; win vs Ihor Samunenkov is a textbook central breakthrough.

Priority Fixes

  1. King safety in “soft” structures
    Twice you entered positions with queens on and a weakened king (losses vs Alexandr Predke and GOGIEFF). In both games you voluntarily played h3/h4 and opened dark-squares while queens were still on the board.
    Action: Before playing pawn moves around your king, run a three-question blunder check: “What changes on the g3/c3 & f-files? Does it leave a hook? Can the opponent sacrifice to open lines?” A 5-second ritual will eliminate many crashes.
  2. Critical moment calculation depth
    In your most recent loss you missed 25…Rf5! and the follow-up …Rh4 which turned the game. The engine shows that after 25.Qb7 you had 25…Kf8 26.Rd1 to hold. You spent only 35 seconds on 25.Qb7.
    Action: Each game contains ~2–3 “slow-down positions.” Use an extra 45 seconds there even in 3|2—your clock management statistics show you usually keep >1:30 unused at the end.
  3. End-game conversion vs. stubborn defense
    The marathon vs Remontada2017 reached a theoretically won rook+rook-pawn vs rook ending, yet slipped away. The technical win involves the “third-rank cut-off” manoeuvre (Rg3/Rg4 etc.).
    Action: Spend 30 minutes with the drills “R+P vs R — side pawn” and “Lucena with checks” in Chess.com’s end-game trainer.

Opening Radar

ColourRepertoire noteQuick tip
WhiteEnglish / KIA / 1.e4 sidelinesAgainst 1…c5 Najdorf you choose the early a4&Be2 plan; score −2 in last 5. Consider switching to the fashionable 9.g4 “modern English attack”.
BlackCaro–Kann & King’s IndianYou meet Exchange-KID with …a5/…b5 ideas nicely (win vs sokidze) but in Caro–Kann Advance 4.dxc5 you allowed the forcing line 5.Qg4 h5 6.Qg3 h4 leaving c5 and h4 weak. Review the quieter 5…Ne7!? systems.

Illustrative Snippet

The critical tactical slip vs Predke:


Stopping here for 30 seconds to spot …Rf5 would have changed the result.

Training Block for the Next Two Weeks

  • 15 puzzles/day rated 2500–2700; tag every miss (pin, zwischenzug, zugzwang etc.).
  • 3 end-game drills/session: rook vs rook+f-/side pawn, and queen vs rook side checks.
  • Play two 10|0 games focusing on no early pawn moves in front of your king. Annotate manually, then engine.

Stats & Motivation

Your historical peak: 3005 (2020-07-14) — within 20 points of GM mark!

Here’s a quick visual of when you score best:

01234567891011121314151617181920212223100%0%Hour of Day
(hint: your tactical vision seems sharper after 14:00 UTC).

Final Word

You are already playing at a strong IM level. Fixing the single issue of pawn pushes around your king and polishing a handful of technical endings can easily yield +40 rating points. Stay disciplined in those critical moments and the results will follow.

Good luck, train hard, and keep the games sharp!

— Your Chess Coach



🆚 Opponent Insights

Most Played Opponents
David Paravyan 25W / 29L / 8D
Sanan Sjugirov 17W / 27L / 14D
pKiLz5Rn9b 19W / 29L / 8D
Artur Gabrielian 32W / 16L / 6D
Sodoma Gomora 29W / 20L / 5D

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2024 2873 2544
2023 2925 2862 2511
2022 2863 2595
2021 2817 2936
2020 2852 2815 2261
2019 2729 2832 2691
2018 2713 2859
2017 2660 2699
2016 2585 2662
Rating by Year20162017201820192020202120222023202429362261YearRatingBulletBlitzRapid

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2024 9W / 8L / 7D 7W / 9L / 6D 97.5
2023 44W / 19L / 9D 29W / 28L / 9D 83.8
2022 69W / 44L / 19D 56W / 52L / 22D 94.7
2021 21W / 6L / 0D 14W / 9L / 4D 91.4
2020 281W / 128L / 52D 243W / 177L / 43D 84.2
2019 348W / 260L / 82D 327W / 282L / 86D 83.7
2018 349W / 224L / 60D 301W / 250L / 67D 81.9
2017 338W / 214L / 43D 307W / 227L / 45D 86.8
2016 139W / 48L / 13D 143W / 41L / 13D 83.4

Openings: Most Played

Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Nimzo-Indian Defense 14 8 2 4 57.1%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 10 4 5 1 40.0%
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense 9 3 5 1 33.3%
Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 8 4 4 0 50.0%
Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation 7 3 1 3 42.9%
Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 7 3 2 2 42.9%
French Defense: Advance Variation 7 3 3 1 42.9%
English Opening: Symmetrical Variation 6 3 1 2 50.0%
Petrov's Defense 6 4 0 2 66.7%
Caro-Kann Defense 6 3 1 2 50.0%
Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Petrov's Defense 178 96 57 25 53.9%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 177 82 75 20 46.3%
Nimzo-Indian Defense 127 68 39 20 53.5%
Modern 110 65 32 13 59.1%
Döry Defense 91 47 29 15 51.6%
English Opening: Agincourt Defense 74 35 27 12 47.3%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 73 37 27 9 50.7%
Slav Defense 73 41 26 6 56.2%
Philidor Defense 71 33 33 5 46.5%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 64 34 22 8 53.1%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Modern 75 49 22 4 65.3%
Döry Defense 58 30 23 5 51.7%
Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack 51 34 14 3 66.7%
Australian Defense 42 22 17 3 52.4%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 39 21 18 0 53.9%
Amar Gambit 33 17 15 1 51.5%
English Opening: Agincourt Defense 31 17 12 2 54.8%
Nimzo-Larsen Attack 28 15 11 2 53.6%
English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense 27 13 10 4 48.1%
Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted 26 18 7 1 69.2%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 25 0
Losing 11 0