Profile: IntuitiveBlow
Meet IntuitiveBlow, a chess player whose handle promises sudden, clever strikes that leave opponents breathless and board positions completely upended. This is not just a username—it’s a lifestyle.
Rating and Style
Peaking at a blistering 2621 blitz rating in July 2024, IntuitiveBlow rockets through tactical melee like a storm on the chessboard. With a rapid peak of 2177 and bullet topping out at 2514, this player handles the clock pressure with enviable confidence, managing a lightning-fast game without losing an ounce of clarity.
The Stats
With over 5,800 blitz games under their belt, IntuitiveBlow shows a dogged persistence and a knack for comebacks, boasting an 82.45% comeback rate—because surrendering early is definitely not in their dictionary.
Win rates paint a vivid portrait: nearly 47% overall in blitz, and a jaw-dropping 92% in rapid games, where victory usually comes after outmaneuvering opponents with surgical precision. Bullet chess is no picnic either, fiercely contested with a solid 44% win rate.
Playing Style
Known for an average of 66 moves per win, IntuitiveBlow prefers the marathon over the sprint — mastering long endgames more often than not (72% endgame frequency!). Early resignations are rare, only around 2%, proving this player fights fiercely until the last piece falls.
Psychologically, a tilt factor of 15 confirms they’re human—but they bounce back quickly, often turning games around after losing pieces, showing a win rate of nearly 45% after such setbacks. The best time to catch IntuitiveBlow at peak form? 1 AM — apparently, the best ideas strike in the witching hour!
Recent Battles
The latest triumph came with a dazzling checkmate against BILLYKABRIT in a blitz game on April 22, 2025, showcasing flawless execution of the Sicilian Defense – Najdorf variation. Unfortunately, even legends have off days: a recent loss on time against FSBN serves as a reminder that chess is as much about endurance as brilliance.
Opponents Beware
IntuitiveBlow’s most frequent rival is resign-plz with 62 games played—their win rate hovers just above 50%, hinting at fierce back-and-forth battles. Against many other challengers, this player’s record is downright impressive, with numerous 100% win rates against various foes. Looks like IntuitiveBlow doesn’t do well with hesitation—opponents better bring their A-game or get ready to be swept off the board.
Fun Facts & Quirks
- Has drubbled certain opponents immunity-style: watch out sevenstar82, ufish, and krishnamurti3—each at a perfect 100% loss rate.
- An impressive longest winning streak of 66 games—seriously, do they ever sleep?
- Average losses are often longer than wins, which makes sense—losing with style is still an art.
- Sometimes games finish with a timely resignation rather than checkmate; no mercy, only strategy.
In sum, IntuitiveBlow is a chess virtuoso wielding the clock and pieces with breathtaking intuition and endurance. Whether you’re a casual player or a grandmaster, they promise a challenging dance on 64 squares, punctuated by unexpected blows and strategic brilliance.
Overview of your recent blitz games
You’ve shown willingness to dive into sharp, tactical positions and keep the momentum with active piece play. In your recent blitz set, you’ve been comfortable pushing pieces onto open files and ready to seize initiative when the position allows. There are clear signs of good calculation and willingness to complicate the game, which suits blitz well where heat of the moment decisions matter.
Two common themes surfaced in your recent opponent interactions: you sometimes initiate aggressive lines that rely on concrete tactical motifs, and you can be a touch optimistic about the compensation after a sacrifice. In fast time formats, that mix can yield nice tactical shots, but it can also backfire if the attack isn’t fully sound or if you overshoot the practical defense.
What you did well
- Active piece placement: you look to activate rooks and minor pieces, often creating pressure along open files or toward the enemy king.
- Resourceful attack attempts: when lines opened, you hunted for forcing sequences and trying to convert the initiative into tangible gains.
- Creative problem solving under pressure: you kept looking for dynamic ideas rather than settling into passive defense when under attack.
- Opening choices showing strength in certain lines: your Scotch-related structures and related dynamic setups have practical bite in blitz when you know the typical traps and motifs.
Key improvement areas
- Time management under pressure: aim to settle on a concrete plan earlier in the game and simplify when the position gets tangled. In blitz, a clear, executable plan often beats chasing deep tactics that aren’t sound.
- King safety and early development: ensure rapid development and safeguard the king, especially after initiating aggressive lines. Unsecured kingside or back rank weaknesses can be decisive when opponents counterattack.
- Evaluating sacrifices more critically: before committing to a tactical sacrifice, verify whether the compensation justifies the risk. When you’re behind in time, it’s easy to overvalue initiative; practice quick motif recognition to judge whether a line is sound.
- Endgame conversion mindset: when the board simplifies, keep a plan for how to convert (or how to hold) the resulting ending. Blitz endgames reward clear, simple plans and avoiding unnecessary material swings.
Opening choices and plan
Your opening data shows strong results in a few lines with solid, practical structures. In particular, the Scotch Game family stands out as a good fit for your style, offering clear plans and tactical opportunities. Other dynamic Sicilian lines can be exciting but may demand more precise knowledge to stay sound in blitz time controls.
- Consider leaning more into the Scotch Game and related ideas where you already perform well. Build a compact, well-drilled set of main lines and typical responses so you can play quickly and confidently.
- For Sicilian choices, pick 1-2 “safer” branches you’re comfortable with and study a few common replies. That helps you keep the initiative without getting tangled in depth you can’t fully calculate on the clock.
- Allocate a small study block to a couple of openings that historically give you trouble. Focus on the critical middlegame plans and typical tactical motifs in those lines, not every sideline.
Training plan for the next week
- Daily tactical drills: 15 minutes focusing on motifs that appeared in your blitz games (forks, pins, discovered attacks, and checkmating nets around the king).
- Blitz review: after every game, spend 5 minutes noting the first 2-3 critical decisions and whether you would choose the same plan again.
- Opening focus: devote 20 minutes to a single opening you like (e.g., Scotch Game). Learn the mainline plans and the typical middlegame ideas so you can play with confidence on the clock.
- Time management drill: play a 3+2 blitz game and practice sticking to a pre-commit plan for the first 15 moves, then reassess. Track whether you run low on time and why.
- Endgame basics: reserve 10 minutes to reinforce common endgame conversions and simple technique (king activity, passed pawns, and correct rook activity in simplified positions).
Next steps and practical ideas
- Identify two openings you enjoy (for example Scotch Game and Caro-Kann/other solid choice) and deepen your understanding of the typical plans in those lines. Practical knowledge beats deep theory in blitz.
- Practice quick pattern recognition: daily puzzles that emphasize tactical themes you’ve used in blitz. This helps you spot forcing lines faster under time pressure.
- In the moments you feel uncertain about a plan, switch to a simple, tested approach: develop pieces, castle safely, contest the center, and seek a single aggressive plan rather than multiple competing ideas.
- Review a recent loss to identify a single turning point where a safer approach could have preserved the position. Use that insight to craft a small “safety rule” for future games (e.g., if you’re down material, avoid overextension and look for consolidation moves).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| alik1262008 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| yerem | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| gm_szachowykocur | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| eirikaarnes | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| palalaw123 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sloanton | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| jo_jak | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| radjagoeks | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ajiteru | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| akbar_yousefii | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resign-Plz | 37W / 28L / 1D | |
| voorivex | 27W / 16L / 0D | |
| saitago | 13W / 11L / 1D | |
| chosroes | 14W / 9L / 1D | |
| Matein36 | 12W / 9L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2292 | |||
| 2024 | 2341 | 2366 | ||
| 2023 | 2330 | |||
| 2022 | 2400 | |||
| 2021 | 2444 | 2300 | 2137 | |
| 2020 | 2392 | 2520 | 2051 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 55W / 53L / 1D | 44W / 65L / 3D | 69.0 |
| 2024 | 174W / 163L / 11D | 163W / 173L / 16D | 69.8 |
| 2023 | 125W / 106L / 10D | 118W / 117L / 6D | 68.9 |
| 2022 | 200W / 168L / 14D | 174W / 184L / 19D | 72.2 |
| 2021 | 410W / 472L / 34D | 384W / 486L / 37D | 69.9 |
| 2020 | 834W / 746L / 52D | 707W / 862L / 56D | 67.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 416 | 177 | 222 | 17 | 42.5% |
| Scotch Game | 363 | 206 | 142 | 15 | 56.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 344 | 161 | 168 | 15 | 46.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 300 | 125 | 165 | 10 | 41.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 242 | 99 | 133 | 10 | 40.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 205 | 106 | 91 | 8 | 51.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 173 | 92 | 76 | 5 | 53.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 164 | 83 | 74 | 7 | 50.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 149 | 73 | 71 | 5 | 49.0% |
| Döry Defense | 138 | 64 | 69 | 5 | 46.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 67 | 27 | 36 | 4 | 40.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 58 | 25 | 31 | 2 | 43.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 56 | 23 | 31 | 2 | 41.1% |
| Scotch Game | 50 | 26 | 22 | 2 | 52.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 43 | 19 | 22 | 2 | 44.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 38 | 15 | 23 | 0 | 39.5% |
| Modern | 38 | 24 | 13 | 1 | 63.2% |
| Czech Defense | 38 | 20 | 17 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 36 | 14 | 21 | 1 | 38.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 34 | 15 | 18 | 1 | 44.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scotch Game | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 66 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 2 |