Profile: Ionlyplayb3
Meet Ionlyplayb3, a formidable chess enthusiast known for their tenacity and creative flair on the 64 squares. With a peak blitz rating soaring above 2180 and bullet games flirting with the 2150 mark, this player demonstrates a rare blend of speed and strategy.
Since 2023, Ionlyplayb3 has engaged in hundreds of Blitz and Bullet battles, accumulating over 400 wins in blitz and almost 800 victories in bullet chess alone. Their preferred opening repertoire is shrouded in secrecy — labeled intriguingly as "Top Secret" — which has netted nearly a 60% win rate in blitz and 59% in bullet games. Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack variations also spice up their game, boasting an impressive 80%+ win rate in blitz.
Known for patience and a love for the endgame (nearly 70% endgame frequency!), Ionlyplayb3 excels in grinding out wins with an average of 68 moves per victory. Early resignation is rare in their playstyle, proving they don’t give up easily (a low 4.46% resignation rate). Their resilience shows in an impressive 66.82% comeback rate after setbacks, turning unfavorable situations around like a magician.
Psychologically, Ionlyplayb3 likes to keep their cool – although a tilt factor of 8 reminds us they’re human after all, just with a poker face sharper than a queen’s diagonal! Their best chess hours are after dinner, shining brightest around 10 PM, proving that the night truly belongs to the bold… and the well-rested.
Off the board, their recent exploits include a beautiful checkmate with the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack and some crafty Chess960 shenanigans that ended with opponents either time forfeiting or resigning in frustration. However, even the strongest warriors face defeat — recent losses show there’s always room to grow and a new line to explore.
Fun fact
Judging by their username, one can only speculate if Ionlyplayb3 truly sticks to the classic “b3” move or if it’s a cheeky tip-off to opponents to beware! Either way, their varied opening strategies suggest they keep everyone guessing — especially when wielding “Top Secret” openings.
In the grand chess theatre, Ionlyplayb3 is a warrior with a clever mind, a strong strategic arsenal, and an endgame swagger that’s as reliable as the ticking chess clock. All hail the player who not only plays but plays to thrill!
Hi Ionlyplayb3!
Below is personalized, constructive feedback based on your recent games and overall style. Keep what already works, polish a few key areas, and you’ll climb quickly.
What you are already doing well
- Specialized repertoire. Your trademark 1.b3 (Nimzowitsch–Larsen Attack) and fianchetto-based systems with Black confuse many opponents and score well when they mis-handle the structure.
- Tactical alertness. Games such as 1.b3 g6 2.Bb2 f6 … 18.Nxg5! show you’re ready to cash in on loose kings.
- Initiative mindset. Fast pawn storms (f- and h-pawns) often put the question to the opponent instead of waiting passively.
- Conversion against weaker kings. When you get the attack, you rarely let go; e.g. 47.Qf8# in the Gishishishi game.
Biggest improvement levers
- King safety before pawn storms. Several losses stem from pushing flank pawns too early. In the loss vs. Knight_Mare_001 you played 9.f4 and 11.f5 before castling; the open g-file cut both your king and rook coordination.
- Central control and development. Against solid replies (…d5/…e5) your 1.b3 lines sometimes lag in center presence, letting Black seize space. Study model games where White follows up with c4 & d4 quickly, or transposes into Reti-type set-ups.
- Time management. You dropped two recent games on the clock. Add quick “checkpoint moments” (opening ⇨ early middlegame ⇨ critical tactics) to spend time where it matters and blitz the routine moves.
- Defensive calculation. The Chess960 loss ended after …Nf3+—a one-move shot that had been telegraphed for two moves. Train with 3-minute “find the opponent’s tactic” exercises to sharpen alertness when you are on the back foot.
- Endgame fundamentals. A few rook-and-pawn endings slipped. Add 10-15 minutes per session on basic rook activity, Lucena/Philidor positions, and converting extra pawns.
Typical mistake snapshot
Here is a critical fragment from the BestPiePie loss. White to move underestimated the …Nf3+ fork:
Antidote: whenever the opponent’s knight lands on an aggressive square (c4/e5/g4, etc.) ask, “What are the forcing follow-ups?” before playing the next move.
Action plan for the next two weeks
| Day(s) | Focus |
|---|---|
| Mon / Thu | 30 min tactic rush (sharp vs. quiet motifs) |
| Tue / Fri | 15 min endgame drill + review one model 1.b3 game |
| Wed | Play two 15 | 10 games, annotate without engine, then compare |
| Weekend | Experiment with 1.d4 or 1.e4 to broaden pattern library |
Track your progress
- Your current personal bests: 1999 (2025-09-07), 2183 (2025-05-19)
- See when you win most:
- Stay consistent:
Keep up the momentum!
You already have an above-average tactical nose and an opening niche that people hate to face. Add a dose of structural understanding and tighter clock discipline, and the 2200 blitz milestone will appear sooner than you think.
Good luck, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| qcrick57 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| zap334400 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| frmu | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| phil_nize | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| kct_2 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| emperorprasanna | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| victor1977062377 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| dadosa | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| spmethod2369 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| antoniofray | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexandra Prado | 64W / 25L / 6D | View Games |
| Jeffery Butt | 1W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
| osc0rp_inc | 8W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| xxcandykushxx | 5W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| Volen Dyulgerov | 1W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2040 | 2109 | 1997 | 1094 |
| 2024 | 1999 | 2059 | 1896 | 992 |
| 2023 | 1972 | 1954 | 1871 | 400 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 133W / 80L / 8D | 113W / 104L / 9D | 70.3 |
| 2024 | 208W / 132L / 7D | 181W / 142L / 12D | 66.7 |
| 2023 | 437W / 192L / 29D | 378W / 219L / 32D | 67.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 310 | 198 | 97 | 15 | 63.9% |
| Modern | 63 | 33 | 24 | 6 | 52.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 52 | 35 | 16 | 1 | 67.3% |
| Australian Defense | 37 | 18 | 17 | 2 | 48.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 30 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 73.3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 15 | 13 | 0 | 53.6% |
| Czech Defense | 21 | 15 | 5 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 17 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 52.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 15 | 6 | 8 | 1 | 40.0% |
| French Defense | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 551 | 341 | 192 | 18 | 61.9% |
| Modern | 198 | 121 | 70 | 7 | 61.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 105 | 65 | 35 | 5 | 61.9% |
| Australian Defense | 63 | 32 | 29 | 2 | 50.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 63 | 41 | 21 | 1 | 65.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 38 | 20 | 18 | 0 | 52.6% |
| French Defense | 33 | 22 | 11 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Modern Defense | 30 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 56.7% |
| Czech Defense | 29 | 11 | 17 | 1 | 37.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 24 | 13 | 10 | 1 | 54.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| KGD: Falkbeer, Marshall/Nimzowitsch, 4.dxc6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 116 | 83 | 29 | 4 | 71.5% |
| Modern | 28 | 17 | 10 | 1 | 60.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 81.2% |
| Czech Defense | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Australian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 26 | 4 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |