Biography
IsaacAbdulsalam, known in the online scene by his handle 12203726, is a chess player with a knack for turning fast games into epic battles. Active across multiple time controls since at least 2012, he carved a reputation as a Blitz specialist who loves long, strategic duels and the occasional cheeky tactical shot. His journey reads like a chess marathon: steady growth, surprising comebacks, and a smile when the clock hits zero. For those who want a quick snapshot, his profile is accessible here: IsaacAbdulsalam 12203726, and you can peek at a visual timeline with
.Playing Style
Isaac favors aggressive, endurance-focused play that shines in the endgame. He enjoys the grind of long games and often outlasts opponents who overestimate early pressure. His approach blends calculated risk with practical resilience, a combination that has helped him bounce back in difficult positions. Highlights from his style include:
- Endgame Frequency: about 79% of games reach an endgame phase.
- Comeback Rate after a setback: roughly 80.89%.
- Average moves per win: ~65.8; per loss: ~74.0.
- White win rate around 50%; Black win rate around 47% in his current activity window.
Career Highlights
Across a decade of competition, Isaac has demonstrated remarkable consistency and grit. Notable moments include:
- Longest winning streak: 18 games.
- Longest losing streak: 19 games.
- Peak Blitz rating reached 2331 (as of August 2025).
Openings and Performance
Isaac’s opening choices showcase a versatile, pragmatic mindset. In Blitz play, several openings stand out for their solid scoring and practical bite:
- Australian Defense — Blitz: 1,689 games, wins 865, losses 753, draws 71; win rate 51.21%
- French Defense — Blitz: 1,278 games, wins 638, losses 592, draws 48; win rate 49.92%
- Amar Gambit — Blitz: 976 games, wins 481, losses 470, draws 25; win rate 49.28%
In Rapid, he leans on sharp, tactical lines too—examples include a high success rate with Philidor-like structures and Amar Gambit variants. His daily play shows a balanced mix, with frequent use of dynamic systems that keep opponents guessing.
Time Controls and Notes
Preferred time control appears to be Blitz, where he has built a substantial track record and a peak rating in the 2300s. Daily play and Rapid rounds reflect his adaptability and willingness to contest complex positions over longer maneuvering battles. For quick reference, his Blitz peak stands at 2331 (Aug 2025).
Profile and Quick Access
Profile: IsaacAbdulsalam 12203726
What to focus on in your blitz play
You show a good sense for sharp, tactical positions and keep fighting until the end. Your pieces often become active quickly, and you look for concrete continuations rather than just developing slowly. On the flip side, blitz times can encourage risky decisions; streamlining early decisions and keeping a solid structure will help you convert more of those sharp moments into wins.
Recent game takeaways
- Win (against Noosh155): You entered a dynamic middlegame with active development and rooks aligned on open lines. You pressed well, coordinated your pieces, and pressed for the win when your opponent’s king and queen coordination loosened. Tip: after you gain the initiative, try to simplify only if it clearly helps you convert the advantage; avoid trades that reduce your attacking chances.
- Loss (against OneFromNone1973): Time pressure and a sharp sequence made the position unforgiving. Focus on keeping a solid pawn structure and avoiding speculative pawn breaks when the clock is tight. Practice a quick, safe routine in the opening to reach a stable middlegame, then look for clean, forcing moves rather than complex traps under time pressure.
- Draw/unclear (paladin_ll vs you): You demonstrated resilience and the ability to hold balance, but there were moments to push for a small improvement. In blitz, aim to identify 1-2 straightforward improvement moves each game that raise the position without increasing risk, so you can steadily nudge toward a win.
Opening performance and repertoire ideas
Your openings show solid results in several semi-closed structures. Consider focusing on 1-2 openings as your primary blitz weapons to build deeper plans and reduce surprise losses. Some openings that have been reasonably reliable for you include the Australian Defense, the Benoni Defense, Amar Gambit, and certain London System lines. You can explore these with quick reference notes or placeholders like:
- Australian Defense: Australian_Defense
- Benoni Defense: Benoni_Defense
- Amar Gambit: Amar_Gambit
- London System: London_System
Concrete training plan
- Short term (1–2 weeks): daily tactics practice (10–15 minutes) to sharpen calculation and pattern recognition; play 3–5 blitz games per day focusing on your core openings.
- Mid term (1–2 months): formalize a small opening repertoire, with clear plans for typical middlegames; review 5 annotated games per week to identify recurring mistakes and improve decision-making under time pressure.
- Time management: implement a simple cadence to monitor the clock (e.g., check time every 3–5 moves; aim for 30 seconds per non-critical move early, reserving 1–2 minutes for critical moments).
- Endgame improvement: practice fundamental endgames (king and pawn endings, rook endings) a few minutes on most training days to improve conversion chances in tight wins.
Small goals for the next period
- Choose 2 openings to own and study their typical middlegame plans over the next two weeks.
- Solve 15–20 tactical puzzles daily and review every mistake to understand the missed motif.
- Play 3 longer blitz games per week (for example 5+3 or 3+2) to build time management discipline and improve endgame technique.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Daulet Nurbolatov | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| larswass | 1W / 1L / 1D | |
| rayan-rahal | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| canfrans | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| tarovsky | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| jeffreyfliying | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| leopolis91 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| jony3099 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| yourtimeruns | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| torvpole | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| faiezco | 358W / 229L / 19D | |
| kakoot | 136W / 93L / 13D | |
| osmanhaddad | 178W / 29L / 9D | |
| motaz | 110W / 74L / 11D | |
| adammasoud | 79W / 104L / 8D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2123 | 2224 | 2038 | 2061 |
| 2024 | 1808 | 2112 | 2021 | 2059 |
| 2023 | 1736 | 2138 | 1952 | 2058 |
| 2022 | 1893 | 2100 | ||
| 2021 | 1929 | 2091 | ||
| 2020 | 1980 | 2000 | 1715 | 2083 |
| 2019 | 1656 | 2020 | 2021 | |
| 2018 | 1528 | 1957 | 1733 | 1969 |
| 2017 | 1703 | 2001 | 1665 | 1828 |
| 2016 | 1517 | 1907 | 1653 | 1790 |
| 2015 | 1276 | 1567 | 1621 | |
| 2014 | 1125 | 1560 | ||
| 2013 | 1038 | 905 | 1452 | 1200 |
| 2012 | 797 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 721W / 700L / 101D | 691W / 733L / 87D | 77.2 |
| 2024 | 1018W / 907L / 102D | 858W / 1065L / 103D | 75.4 |
| 2023 | 693W / 623L / 92D | 589W / 736L / 84D | 78.1 |
| 2022 | 331W / 307L / 30D | 287W / 352L / 38D | 76.9 |
| 2021 | 255W / 207L / 25D | 245W / 221L / 29D | 72.2 |
| 2020 | 909W / 765L / 70D | 809W / 842L / 77D | 75.7 |
| 2019 | 1910W / 1673L / 146D | 1815W / 1807L / 132D | 75.0 |
| 2018 | 2301W / 2090L / 131D | 2167W / 2268L / 119D | 72.6 |
| 2017 | 4466W / 4448L / 178D | 4510W / 4445L / 205D | 66.8 |
| 2016 | 2479W / 2316L / 121D | 2347W / 2472L / 153D | 69.5 |
| 2015 | 589W / 485L / 26D | 539W / 570L / 24D | 58.9 |
| 2014 | 56W / 38L / 0D | 41W / 48L / 2D | 59.4 |
| 2013 | 111W / 90L / 1D | 107W / 85L / 3D | 55.6 |
| 2012 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 4L / 0D | 34.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1710 | 874 | 764 | 72 | 51.1% |
| French Defense | 1278 | 638 | 592 | 48 | 49.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 983 | 485 | 473 | 25 | 49.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 959 | 444 | 477 | 38 | 46.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 932 | 455 | 434 | 43 | 48.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 918 | 451 | 422 | 45 | 49.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 799 | 341 | 397 | 61 | 42.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 760 | 365 | 364 | 31 | 48.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 718 | 364 | 320 | 34 | 50.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 717 | 322 | 360 | 35 | 44.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 2751 | 1327 | 1375 | 49 | 48.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 1888 | 936 | 918 | 34 | 49.6% |
| French Defense | 1390 | 720 | 649 | 21 | 51.8% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 918 | 456 | 434 | 28 | 49.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 741 | 377 | 354 | 10 | 50.9% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 620 | 305 | 300 | 15 | 49.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 614 | 288 | 312 | 14 | 46.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 582 | 273 | 296 | 13 | 46.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 574 | 275 | 290 | 9 | 47.9% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 443 | 245 | 192 | 6 | 55.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 21 | 9 | 12 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 21 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 20 | 16 | 4 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 71.4% |
| French Defense | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Elephant Gambit | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 17 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 88.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 14 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 92.9% |
| Czech Defense | 13 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 69.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 12 | 11 | 1 | 0 | 91.7% |
| QGD: Chigorin, 3.cxd5 | 11 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 72.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 0 |
| Losing | 19 | 1 |