Christopher Pace
National Master of Chess
Christopher Pace, known in the chess world as ItalianMachine, has danced their pieces across the board with the grace and precision of a seasoned National Master. Whether blitzing through rapid-fire matches or patiently strategizing in long daily games, Christopher’s chess journey is nothing short of a rollercoaster—sometimes soaring to dizzying rating heights, other times taking a breather to ponder the mysteries of Zugzwang.
Starting with a modest blitz rating of around 2200 back in 2010, Chris steadily climbed the ladder to reach an impressive peak blitz rating of 2557 in September 2023. Not to be outdone, their bullet games reached a zenith of 2476 in early 2024, proving that the fastest brain beats the clock. Their rapid and daily ratings also tell tales of a versatile warrior, with highs above 2400 and a penchant for seizing victory.
Winning isn't just a pastime—it’s a streak! Christopher boasts a personal longest winning streak of 31 games. They also know the tough taste of losing, but only after a mere 21-game losing streak, which is practically a warm-up in the battlefield of sixty-four squares.
Playing Style and Quirks
- Early Resignation Rate: A humble 0.88%, meaning Christopher hardly ever throws in the towel early—unless the opponent has just pulled off a preposterous gambit.
- Endgame Enthusiast: With a frequent endgame presence of over 74%, our National Master loves the long haul of slowly strangling opponents—think of it as chess’s way of slow cooking.
- Comeback Kid: An astounding 82.92% comeback rate after losing a piece shows resilience that would make Rocky Balboa proud.
- Time Preferences: Early birds catch the worm; for Chris, 8 AM is their shining hour when their brain's knights and bishops are firing on all cylinders.
Opening Lightsaber
Chris wields a mysterious "Top Secret" opening arsenal with a solid 56%+ win rate in blitz. When feeling adventurous, Chris dabbles in the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack and King's Indian Defense, sometimes winning over 75% of those battles. Honestly, it's like having a secret weapon that opponents can only guess at (and still lose).
A Recent Blast from the Board
Just last month, at a game on May 28, 2025, ItalianMachine triumphed over 2011KING in a thrilling exchange of Slav Defense moves, ending with the opponent’s resignation. The final moves were a testament to Christopher’s tactical prowess, showcasing strong pressure, creativity, and nerves of steel.
Records and Rivalries
Christopher's chess journey is filled with memorable battles against familiar foes. Their favorite opponent for grinding out wins? italian-stallion1, with a whopping 83% win rate in their 1,341 encounters. But watch out: some adversaries have managed to test the master’s mettle with near-zero success rates. Sometimes, even masters get stumped!
In Conclusion
Christopher Pace is not just a chess player; they’re a chess storyteller, weaving tales of sacrifice, strategy, and subtlety on the 64 squares. With a National Master title in hand and a hunger for improving their play, the chess world eagerly watches as ItalianMachine continues to surprise, conquer, and utterly baffle opponents around the globe.
Remember the name—at least until next game.
What You're Doing Well
Christopher, your recent games show a number of strengths in your blitz play:
- Strong opening repertoire: You have solid win rates in openings like the Scandinavian Defense (64.12%) and the Czech Defense (62.15%). This reflects well-preparedness and comfort in these lines.
- Aggressive play and tactical awareness: Your wins often involve active piece play, such as the sacrifices and attacking play seen in your recent victories.
- Good time management in complex positions: You generally maintain a good pace even in complicated middlegame positions, which is important in blitz.
- Consistency in playing strong lines: Your use of mainline and classical openings like the Italian Game and Caro-Kann Defense with high win rates indicates a consistent and reliable approach.
Areas to Improve
To continue advancing, here are some key improvement points to focus on:
- Endgame technique: Some recent games ended with you losing on time in endgame positions where you had winning chances. Improving precision and speed in endgames could yield more wins.
- Time pressure resilience: Losses and some draws have resulted when you were low on time. Practice managing your clock so you can maintain quality moves even under severe time constraints.
- Handling counterattacks: In a few losses, your opponents countered decisively after you committed to an attack. Work on recognizing and preparing for common countermeasures in your main openings.
- Minimizing unforced errors in the middlegame: Though aggressive, some positions show you could benefit from deeper calculation to avoid tactical oversights.
- Diversifying your opening choices: While you have favorites with good results, adding a few new lines could make you less predictable and help handle surprises effectively.
Strategic Recommendations
- Work on practicing rapid and blitz endgame drills focused on king and pawn endings, minor piece endings, and basic rook endgames to build speed and accuracy.
- Use online puzzles to hone tactical pattern recognition and calculation skills, especially to avoid simple blunders in critical moments.
- Try incorporating quick decision-making exercises to build your comfort in time trouble to keep the quality of moves up even late in the clock.
- Analyze your losses for recurring themes and typical opponent responses to your attacks—this will help you prepare targeted counter-strategies.
- Continue building on your strong openings but consider adding a surprise weapon or two to throw off prepared opponents.
Recent Performance Trends
Your rating has shown positive gains over the last month and six months, with a 21 point increase in one month and 15 points gain over six months. However, the three-month trend indicates some variance, and longer-term slopes show a slight downward move. This suggests you're on the right path but should keep focused on consistent improvement, especially in closing out games and time management.
Example Game Highlights
In your recent win against CM_UlaneoM, you played the Slav Defense and demonstrated excellent board control and tactical sharpness, especially by seizing the initiative with a knight sacrifice that led to a dominant endgame. You also showed good patience maneuvering your pieces effectively before delivering the final push.
On the flip side, in your loss to MangekyoVision in the Italian Game, time pressure and defensive inaccuracies in the endgame contributed to the defeat. Working on endgame speed and accuracy could prevent similar results.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alex Jian | 3W / 4L / 0D | |
| moistketchup | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| amitz8000 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| munashej1999 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ricardofagner | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| redos2 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| shimon0296 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| yari910 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| niksmbidkar | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| chessirca90 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| italian-stallion1 | 1095W / 187L / 39D | |
| the_great_jake | 319W / 68L / 31D | |
| super-villian | 226W / 56L / 18D | |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 50W / 158L / 6D | |
| Eduardo Ortiz | 81W / 42L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2384 | 2385 | 2360 | |
| 2024 | 2398 | 2349 | 2361 | 1626 |
| 2023 | 2322 | 2355 | 2211 | 1742 |
| 2022 | 2189 | 2314 | 2142 | 1834 |
| 2021 | 2330 | 2249 | 2240 | |
| 2020 | 2227 | 2277 | 2231 | |
| 2019 | 2099 | 2267 | 1748 | |
| 2018 | 2150 | 2323 | 1862 | |
| 2017 | 2277 | 2204 | 2104 | 2005 |
| 2016 | 2311 | 2256 | 2162 | 2051 |
| 2015 | 2185 | 2229 | 2186 | 2018 |
| 2014 | 2187 | 2123 | 2351 | 1949 |
| 2013 | 2200 | 2063 | 1909 | |
| 2012 | 2045 | 2041 | 1933 | |
| 2011 | 1199 | 2009 | 1795 | 1793 |
| 2010 | 1199 | 2212 | 1705 | |
| 2009 | 1490 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 344W / 160L / 36D | 314W / 196L / 32D | 68.1 |
| 2024 | 295W / 112L / 28D | 296W / 129L / 21D | 66.9 |
| 2023 | 481W / 280L / 53D | 452W / 280L / 71D | 68.4 |
| 2022 | 583W / 200L / 55D | 528W / 252L / 62D | 66.3 |
| 2021 | 137W / 46L / 14D | 129W / 53L / 16D | 66.7 |
| 2020 | 364W / 181L / 29D | 335W / 206L / 45D | 68.1 |
| 2019 | 475W / 207L / 30D | 462W / 220L / 36D | 68.5 |
| 2018 | 726W / 540L / 81D | 709W / 578L / 69D | 72.6 |
| 2017 | 707W / 470L / 57D | 670W / 497L / 51D | 70.8 |
| 2016 | 1243W / 862L / 103D | 1159W / 937L / 109D | 73.3 |
| 2015 | 1083W / 815L / 122D | 1077W / 849L / 121D | 76.3 |
| 2014 | 1135W / 701L / 110D | 1048W / 761L / 138D | 71.9 |
| 2013 | 869W / 404L / 53D | 838W / 415L / 67D | 70.8 |
| 2012 | 113W / 33L / 6D | 113W / 31L / 5D | 71.6 |
| 2011 | 18W / 17L / 3D | 36W / 14L / 1D | 32.9 |
| 2010 | 35W / 8L / 0D | 35W / 7L / 1D | 66.1 |
| 2009 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 3L / 0D | 31.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 990 | 571 | 373 | 46 | 57.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 674 | 380 | 260 | 34 | 56.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 592 | 326 | 235 | 31 | 55.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 492 | 315 | 141 | 36 | 64.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 449 | 270 | 152 | 27 | 60.1% |
| Scotch Game | 414 | 250 | 145 | 19 | 60.4% |
| Czech Defense | 367 | 230 | 126 | 11 | 62.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 364 | 212 | 133 | 19 | 58.2% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 363 | 212 | 137 | 14 | 58.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 362 | 215 | 126 | 21 | 59.4% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 306 | 203 | 92 | 11 | 66.3% |
| Modern | 215 | 142 | 62 | 11 | 66.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 188 | 121 | 54 | 13 | 64.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 162 | 79 | 79 | 4 | 48.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 155 | 94 | 55 | 6 | 60.6% |
| Australian Defense | 141 | 97 | 39 | 5 | 68.8% |
| French Defense | 135 | 87 | 42 | 6 | 64.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 132 | 93 | 34 | 5 | 70.5% |
| Czech Defense | 130 | 79 | 47 | 4 | 60.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 129 | 83 | 43 | 3 | 64.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 19 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 89.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 19 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 68.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 15 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 73.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% |
| Australian Defense | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 12 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% |
| Four Knights Game | 11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 81.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 11 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown Opening* | 36 | 26 | 10 | 0 | 72.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 19 | 15 | 2 | 2 | 79.0% |
| French Defense | 16 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 81.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 68.8% |
| Modern | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 15 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 14 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 61.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 41 | 2 |
| Losing | 18 | 0 |