Player Profile: J3sus589
Meet J3sus589 – a tireless chess gladiator whose journey through the 64 squares is nothing short of epic. With a peak bullet rating soaring beyond 2050 (yes, that’s quite a flex) and a blitz peak of over 2060, this player is no stranger to the adrenaline-fueled chaos of fast-paced games.
Whether it’s the bullet time control where J3sus589 has tangled with thousands of opponents or the more methodical rapid games, this player has showcased a dynamic style. Known for a 77% endgame frequency and an impressive comeback rate of 77%, J3sus589 never backs down—even when the chips (pawns) are down. Their average game length is a solid 75 moves, which suggests this is a thinker who loves a good, drawn-out battle... or maybe just really enjoys pressing that clock.
Opening repertoire? J3sus589 dips into classics and experimental lines alike, with a penchant for the Pirc Defense, Scandinavian Defense, and the mysterious Top Secret (probably involving a few sneaky bishops and an ill-timed sacrifice). The Van t Kruijs Opening stands out with a remarkable 60%+ win rate, proving that not all heroes keep to the beaten path!
Psychologically, this player has a manageable tilt factor (around 12) and a curious 5.61% early resignation rate—so there’s always a glimmer of hope, or perhaps occasional ‘phew!’ moments. J3sus589 loves grinding it out on Tuesdays and at 21:00 hours when win rates slightly peak, showing a strong preference for late-night strategic skirmishes.
While their record shows a few ups and downs—losing some and winning plenty—their resilience is palpable. They’ve battled rivals like jjtmchess2002 over 500 times (a true nemesis?), frequently faced off with ajedrezconmonchess, and have managed significant victories over a sea of players. If you’re brave enough, try your hand at J3sus589’s arena!
And for those who like a peek behind the curtain, here is a gem from a recent victory - a tactical showcase of patience against the Pirc Defense:
A brave soul who mixes strategy, magic, and just a touch of chaos to keep opponents guessing. Watch out for the warrior named J3sus589 on the battlefield of minds—he’s here to make you think twice before your next move!
What you’re doing well
You show a strong appetite for tactics and are capable of converting initiative into a decisive result. In the recent victory, you coordinated your pieces aggressively and executed a sharp sequence that culminated in a mating finish. That kind of calculation and willingness to execute complex ideas under time pressure is a valuable strength in blitz.
- You apply pressure on the opponent’s king and look for tactical motifs like piece sacrifices or forcing lines that open lines for rooks and queens.
- You maintain activity of your pieces in the middlegame, often placing knights and rooks on active, attacking squares.
- You show resilience in dynamic positions and don’t shy away from sharp, unbalanced games which can yield chances against aggressive opponents.
Areas to improve
- Be cautious with over-ambitious tactics. In some losses, the follow-up after a forcing line wasn’t clear. Before committing to a long tactical sequence, ensure you have a concrete plan for the next 2–3 moves and that your king safety isn’t in jeopardy if the attack stalls.
- Endgame conversion can be the difference between a win and a draw or loss in blitz. Work on practical simplifications when you’re ahead and practice rook endgames, king activity, and basic technique to convert advantages more reliably.
- Time management can influence decision quality. Aim to maintain a steady pace earlier in the game and reserve some thinking time for critical middlegame turning points, especially when your opponent’s structure begins to shift.
- When you’re in a position with multiple tactical ideas, quickly verify that you’re not missing a stronger defensive or counter-attacking resource for your opponent. A quick check for threats, captures, and checks can prevent blunders.
Opening and plan considerations
Your openings show you’re comfortable with dynamic, tactical contours as Black and you’re willing to engage in imbalanced middlegames. A practical approach would be to deepen two reliable lines you enjoy and build a simple plan for the transition to the middle game.
- Pick two main defenses you like (for example, a solid response and a tactical counter-option). Study key middlegame plans, typical pawn structures, and common piece maneuvers in those lines so you can translate early advantage into concrete play.
- Prepare a basic anti-counter plan for the main opponent responses you face. Knowing a couple of corrective moves to unusual replies helps keep your attack coherent rather than reactive.
Recommended practice plan (next 2 weeks)
- Opening study: dedicate 2 sessions per week to deepening 1–2 openings you use most. Create a simple 8–12 move plan for the typical middlegame you expect in those lines.
- Endgame drills: practice rook endings and basic king-activity concepts (building outside passed pawns, using the king actively, and targeting weak pawns).
- Post-game review routine: after each blitz game, write 2 key takeaways (one positive, one improvement) and add 1 concrete change you’ll try in the next game.
- Time-check practice: play with a modest time control (e.g., 3+2 or 5+0) to build consistency. Keep a small buffer of 1–2 minutes for the critical moments in the last 5–8 moves of a game.
Quick coaching notes you can apply now
- Before starting a tactical sequence, pause to articulate your intended plan for 2–4 moves ahead. If the plan isn’t clear, consider a safer continuation that maintains activity without overextending your pieces.
- In the transition to the middlegame, aim to place your rooks on open files and connect your queen with other heavy pieces. This reduces the risk of miscoordinated attacks.
- In the endgame, seek to keep the initiative by forcing your opponent to defend rather than you calculating. If winning chances aren’t clear, seek a concrete simplification that preserves your material edge or a lasting positional advantage.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| tae2416 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ttkkk | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| kicozula | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| ukg_knight_dance | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| naikenahs | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sindoseijo | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| uzzolhossain6 | 0W / 0L / 1D | |
| vanarp_2004 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| agustyasuniwinoto | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| efrianes | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Juan Tapia Mena | 265W / 315L / 35D | |
| Rodrigo Casares | 44W / 339L / 13D | |
| redilf2005 | 43W / 84L / 13D | |
| mitsuperu | 46W / 60L / 7D | |
| daniel8738 | 65W / 37L / 7D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2005 | 2004 | 2033 | |
| 2024 | 1800 | 2040 | 2031 | 1811 |
| 2023 | 1599 | 1810 | 1772 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1040W / 1215L / 138D | 1127W / 1125L / 149D | 81.4 |
| 2024 | 2469W / 2198L / 267D | 2372W / 2256L / 282D | 75.8 |
| 2023 | 1338W / 1178L / 174D | 1307W / 1245L / 186D | 75.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 1413 | 668 | 669 | 76 | 47.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 898 | 421 | 430 | 47 | 46.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 453 | 221 | 212 | 20 | 48.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 425 | 217 | 191 | 17 | 51.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 416 | 211 | 181 | 24 | 50.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 346 | 162 | 176 | 8 | 46.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 308 | 137 | 158 | 13 | 44.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 270 | 114 | 145 | 11 | 42.2% |
| French Defense | 267 | 130 | 125 | 12 | 48.7% |
| Australian Defense | 265 | 114 | 139 | 12 | 43.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 1159 | 589 | 493 | 77 | 50.8% |
| Unknown | 845 | 464 | 378 | 3 | 54.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 369 | 186 | 151 | 32 | 50.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 367 | 197 | 147 | 23 | 53.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 343 | 166 | 157 | 20 | 48.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 308 | 134 | 153 | 21 | 43.5% |
| French Defense | 248 | 138 | 93 | 17 | 55.6% |
| Alekhine Defense | 231 | 121 | 101 | 9 | 52.4% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 202 | 104 | 82 | 16 | 51.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 189 | 114 | 65 | 10 | 60.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 522 | 270 | 211 | 41 | 51.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 156 | 89 | 52 | 15 | 57.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 151 | 73 | 64 | 14 | 48.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 127 | 60 | 52 | 15 | 47.2% |
| French Defense | 96 | 44 | 39 | 13 | 45.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 83 | 44 | 29 | 10 | 53.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 82 | 38 | 36 | 8 | 46.3% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 73 | 37 | 31 | 5 | 50.7% |
| Four Knights Game | 62 | 26 | 30 | 6 | 41.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 57 | 24 | 29 | 4 | 42.1% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |