Player Profile: jairvd6
Meet jairvd6, the chess warrior who’s been battling on the 64-square battlefield since 2010, steadily climbing from a modest rapid rating of 909 to a blazing peak of 1685 in 2024. Known for embracing the King’s Indian Attack and the Pirc Defense like an old friend, Jairvd6 masterfully blends solid strategic play with occasional tactical fireworks.
Despite a humble bullet rating peak of 1595, this player’s persistence is remarkable—with over 13,959 bullet wins and nearly as many losses, sometimes the brunt of many blunders, but hey, who’s counting? Jairvd6 never quits early, boasting a low early resignation rate of just 2.2%, and knows how to fight back with an impressive 64.5% comeback rate after setbacks.
Favorite chess hours? Noon and mid-afternoon, when the mind is sharp and blunders are kept at bay (or so the stats say). Expect creative openings and a penchant for longer, intricate battles, with average winning games stretching over 66 moves. Playing white gives a slight edge with a 51.12% win rate, while black games are not too shabby either, maintaining a nearly balanced 47.45%.
Notable achievements:
- Mastery in the King’s Indian Attack Yugoslav Variation and the Reti Opening, boasting win rates above 53% in bullet.
- A recent spectacular checkmate victory against underscorethe employing a classic buildup with King’s Indian Attack motifs.
- Maintains emotional coolness with a tilt factor of 30 and rarely succumbs to one-sided losses.
Whether you’re a chess enthusiast or just here for the antics, join jairvd6 on their quest to turn the tides, one clever move and occasional blunder at a time. Because in the end, it’s not just about winning but making the opponent wonder what happened when they lost on time or got checkmated in style!
What went well in your recent rapid games
You’re showing steady progress and solid understanding in the middlegame, with good piece activity in several games. Your ability to keep pressure and create practical chances against different defenses is a strong sign of improving calculation and planning under time pressure.
- You have demonstrated resilience and the ability to convert favorable middlegame positions into decisive results when your plan comes together, especially in the longer sequences where piece coordination matters.
- Your opening selections often lead to solid, playable positions where you can dictate the flow of the middlegame rather than reacting passively.
- You’re comfortable navigating complex exchanges and trades that simplify into favorable endgames, which is a valuable strength in rapid events.
Areas to improve
- Time management: aim to keep a steady pace and avoid spending too long on non-critical moves. Build a habit of a quick, 30-second review before critical transitions to ensure you’re guiding the game rather than letting it slip into your opponent’s comfort zone.
- Pattern recognition in the middlegame: identify and practice themes you’ve encountered in losses, such as how tactical shots or piece activity from the opponent can tighten the squeeze. Regular tactic training that focuses on common motifs (back-rank ideas, overloaded pieces, and timely piece trades) will help you spot these sooner.
- Endgame technique: convert rook-and-pawn endings and other simplified endings more reliably. Practice common endgame rook maneuvers and pawn breakthroughs so you can press or hold wins in rapid time controls.
- Opening depth: while your high-performing lines show promise, Nimzo-Larsen Attack results are more variable. Consider consolidating two strong, repeatable openings (for example Colle System variation and a structured King’s Indian Attack approach) and learn their core plans, common middlegame ideas, and typical pawn breaks to reduce surprise responses.
Openings: quick snapshot and plan
Your data highlights two lines with strong performance: Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation and King’s Indian Attack family styles. Lean into a repeatable, well-understood plan for these lines: develop smoothly, castle safely, activate the central pawns through timely breaks, and keep your king well-protected. You also have valuable results with the King’s Indian Attack variants that resemble a flexible, solid setup; deepen familiarity with typical middlegame ideas from these structures.
Practice plan and weekly focus
- Weeks 1-2: Drill the main lines of Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation and King’s Indian Attack variants. Memorize key move orders and the typical pawn breaks that define the middlegame plans.
- Week 3: Tactics and endgames. Do 15-20 focused puzzles daily, emphasizing patterns that showed up in recent games. Practice rook endings with pawns and common king and rook maneuvers.
- Week 4: Review recent games with a critical eye. Identify one concrete improvement from each game and add a couple of backup ideas for tough defenses to your repertoire.
Recent game highlights (non-technical take)
From your latest results, your wins tend to come from clear middlegame plans and effective piece coordination, while losses often arise from sharp tactical responses that test your calculation under time pressure. Your draws show you can hold difficult positions when opponents push. The practical takeaway is to strengthen your middlegame planning and your ability to recognize and blunt tactical threats earlier in the game.
Next steps and short-term goals
- Choose two high-quality openings to rely on for the next 4-6 weeks and practice them with a clear, repeatable plan. Track results to confirm improvement.
- In every game, identify the opponent’s main threat by move 15 and respond with a simple, solid reply that keeps your king safe and develops a plan.
- Schedule a weekly game-review session to extract one concrete improvement from each game and one recurring pattern to reinforce.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mahdi00988 | 5W / 0L / 0D | View |
| oldvalerian | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| baokhang271 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| mkcovua | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| suhesh26 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| principiantembh | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| orenperetz11 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 9ashby | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| monkey12123 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| simsim164 | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mcconerfam1 | 16W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| nwanda_75 | 15W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| souzapintor | 10W / 9L / 0D | View Games |
| jeroendm | 13W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| jjd07 | 13W / 1L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1392 | 1424 | 1474 | 1665 |
| 2024 | 1361 | 1457 | 1634 | |
| 2023 | 1490 | 1378 | 1623 | |
| 2022 | 1313 | 1380 | 1388 | |
| 2021 | 1465 | 1345 | 1247 | |
| 2020 | 1451 | 1365 | 1321 | |
| 2019 | 1315 | 1324 | 1340 | 1522 |
| 2018 | 1047 | 1362 | 1493 | |
| 2017 | 870 | 1235 | 1266 | 1345 |
| 2010 | 909 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1285W / 1141L / 75D | 1159W / 1279L / 60D | 64.7 |
| 2024 | 819W / 780L / 55D | 811W / 805L / 44D | 65.6 |
| 2023 | 934W / 867L / 51D | 929W / 892L / 54D | 67.1 |
| 2022 | 1172W / 1049L / 56D | 1089W / 1138L / 57D | 65.5 |
| 2021 | 1095W / 972L / 70D | 1007W / 1075L / 77D | 66.7 |
| 2020 | 1666W / 1482L / 93D | 1524W / 1624L / 93D | 66.9 |
| 2019 | 1060W / 888L / 57D | 930W / 1013L / 53D | 62.5 |
| 2018 | 785W / 736L / 58D | 724W / 769L / 55D | 64.8 |
| 2017 | 650W / 591L / 36D | 612W / 637L / 38D | 64.6 |
| 2010 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 22.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 6782 | 3251 | 3360 | 171 | 47.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 6342 | 3209 | 2961 | 172 | 50.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 5654 | 2886 | 2602 | 166 | 51.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2015 | 983 | 975 | 57 | 48.8% |
| King's Indian Attack | 1509 | 766 | 706 | 37 | 50.8% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 1090 | 581 | 478 | 31 | 53.3% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 1015 | 442 | 545 | 28 | 43.5% |
| Modern Defense | 871 | 428 | 423 | 20 | 49.1% |
| King's Indian Defense | 642 | 316 | 297 | 29 | 49.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 424 | 215 | 201 | 8 | 50.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1018 | 537 | 449 | 32 | 52.8% |
| Czech Defense | 892 | 420 | 439 | 33 | 47.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 837 | 440 | 354 | 43 | 52.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 827 | 424 | 375 | 28 | 51.3% |
| Modern | 610 | 283 | 307 | 20 | 46.4% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 249 | 112 | 124 | 13 | 45.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 222 | 130 | 85 | 7 | 58.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 202 | 95 | 99 | 8 | 47.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 146 | 69 | 74 | 3 | 47.3% |
| Australian Defense | 128 | 70 | 55 | 3 | 54.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 19 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 68.4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 26.7% |
| Czech Defense | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 8 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 12.5% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Zagreb Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 210 | 96 | 109 | 5 | 45.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 135 | 65 | 63 | 7 | 48.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 70 | 35 | 31 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 57 | 29 | 26 | 2 | 50.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 46 | 20 | 23 | 3 | 43.5% |
| Modern Defense | 33 | 17 | 13 | 3 | 51.5% |
| King's Indian Attack | 33 | 16 | 15 | 2 | 48.5% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 27 | 17 | 9 | 1 | 63.0% |
| Modern | 21 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 47.6% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 5 |
| Losing | 30 | 0 |