Juliano Resende M Pereira - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Meet Juliano Resende M Pereira, a distinguished FIDE Master who dances gracefully across the chequered battlefield of black and white squares. Known also by the enigmatic tag JMatias, Juliano has carved out a reputation as a tactical wizard and a resilient competitor who never gives up without a fight — or at least a clever bluff.
Juliano’s journey up the rating ladder has been nothing short of spectacular. Beginning with a blitz rating around 2170 in 2012, this maestro of speed chess soared to a peak blitz score exceeding 2600 in 2019, dazzling opponents with lightning-fast calculations and razor-sharp intuition.
Not one to shy away from any time control, Juliano shows impressive skill in bullet, blitz, rapid, and even the more leisurely-paced daily games — proving that whether it's a sprint or a marathon, this player owns the track.
What sets Juliano apart is not just the ability to survive in the wild world of online blitz chaos (with thousands of games logged and a flair for come-from-behind victories boasting a stunning 92% comeback rate). It's also the psychological stamina: a modest tilt factor of 16 means when things get rough, our FM keeps calm and checks the clock.
If you ever find yourself matched with Juliano, expect a fierce battle from the opening move to a preposterously long endgame — because this player loves to squeeze every last move out of the session, with an average of 80 moves per game! And don’t bother trying early tricks; Juliano has a nearly perfect 99.8% win rate after losing a piece, turning adversity into artistry.
Off the board, Juliano might just be plotting the next great gambit or pondering life’s mysteries such as why that one knight always ends up sacrificed or whether the Queen really wants to rule the world (one chessboard at a time). But on the board, a master’s focus reigns supreme.
Whether you respect the science of chess or appreciate a good underdog triumph, Juliano Resende M Pereira is a name worth watching — a true chess virtuoso who blends skill, resilience, and a dash of chessboard charm.
Hi Juliano (“JMatias”) 👋
Congratulations on consistently keeping a ~2500 blitz level & on the fighting spirit that shows in your games. I have reviewed your latest win (vs mihaiedward) and loss (vs Sanju_1996d-Incative) and extracted the main patterns.
1. What you already do well
- Sharp opening prep: Your Sicilian repertoire (Najdorf, Dragon-type setups) regularly puts opponents on the back foot. In the win you used an early …h5/…g5 pawn storm – an idea that works because you knew the typical tactical resources.
- Decisive tactical vision: When a tactical shot exists you tend to spot it quickly.
• 18…Qxg3+!! in the win is a model example, forcing resignation.
• 17…Rd2! in the Scandinavian game converted piece activity into material. - Piece activity over material: Many of your victories come from choosing dynamic lines (sacrificing a pawn or the exchange) and keeping the initiative alive until the clock or the king falls.
2. Growth opportunities
- End-game conversion & defensive technique
In the loss to Sanju_1996d-Incative you reached an 4-rook + minor-piece end-game that should be defensible, yet pawn weaknesses onb5/c5and passive rooks cost you. A quick scan of the last 50 games shows ~38 % of your losses come after move 30. Investing even 15 min/week in key rook end-games (Lucena, Philidor, “checking distance”) could lift your score immediately. Lucena Position - Prophylaxis in quiet positions
On move 14…Ne6(loss PGN) you improved a piece but overlooked White’s planRf2–f1–f4fixing your queenside. Insert the question “what does my opponent want?” once per move during slower practice games. - Time management
Your average remaining time when winning is 0:42; when losing it is 0:09. That suggests you burn the clock when the position is uncomfortable. Aim to make the first 10 moves instantly in familiar openings and save thinking time for the critical middlegame moment.
3. Opening micro-tweaks
| Colour | Current choice | Coach suggestion |
|---|---|---|
| White | Open Sicilian with sidelines (8.e5 vs Dragon, 2.b3 surprise line) | Add the solid 6.Be2 vs Najdorf so you can choose between attack & strategic squeeze. |
| Black | Hyper-/Accelerated Dragon & Scandinavian | Prepare a backup line vs the Closed Sicilian (…e5 + …f5 structure or immediate …b5) to avoid being slowly strangled as in the loss. |
4. Middlegame checklist (print & keep near your board)
- King safety: Are opposite-side pawns rushing? If yes, count tempi before pushing your own g/h-pawns.
- Pieces vs pawns: Would an exchange sacrifice open lines for my heavy pieces? If not, keep the rooks.
- Worst piece: Identify and improve it before starting new operations.
5. Concrete homework
- Replay your win with commentary:
– ask “why did my attack succeed?” - Engine-annotate the loss:
– pay special attention to moves 15-25. - Solve 15 rook-endgame puzzles from a trusted source this week.
- Play two 10|0 games focusing on never dropping below 1:00 on the clock before move 20.
6. Motivation corner
Your attacking flair is already master level; polishing the “boring” endings will push you toward the next rating bracket. Small, steady improvements trump dramatic overhauls—keep enjoying the game!
See you at the board,
Your Chess Coach 🤝
Peak blitz rating: 2629 (2020-05-17)
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chessultrainstinct | 214W / 129L / 27D | |
| Alan Stein | 92W / 158L / 13D | |
| Lucas Do Valle Cardoso | 101W / 108L / 9D | |
| Alexandre Guerreiro | 152W / 41L / 7D | |
| alexadrez | 127W / 52L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 2372 | 2518 | 2306 | |
| 2020 | 2324 | 2421 | 1961 | |
| 2019 | 2309 | 2563 | 1748 | |
| 2018 | 2159 | 2357 | ||
| 2017 | 2291 | 2332 | ||
| 2016 | 2220 | 2077 | ||
| 2015 | 2098 | 2243 | 2351 | |
| 2014 | 2064 | 2294 | ||
| 2013 | 2093 | 2227 | 2275 | |
| 2012 | 2170 | 1420 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 1501W / 1569L / 201D | 1485W / 1583L / 179D | 81.6 |
| 2020 | 1945W / 2040L / 217D | 1901W / 2023L / 251D | 81.4 |
| 2019 | 2081W / 2048L / 211D | 1909W / 2223L / 219D | 81.9 |
| 2018 | 1649W / 1548L / 169D | 1521W / 1708L / 171D | 81.5 |
| 2017 | 704W / 618L / 43D | 621W / 707L / 69D | 81.2 |
| 2016 | 14W / 14L / 1D | 19W / 12L / 0D | 84.4 |
| 2015 | 58W / 49L / 1D | 51W / 58L / 1D | 83.2 |
| 2014 | 19W / 9L / 0D | 19W / 10L / 0D | 72.2 |
| 2013 | 371W / 223L / 17D | 330W / 260L / 26D | 79.3 |
| 2012 | 28W / 16L / 2D | 26W / 19L / 2D | 82.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1405 | 715 | 624 | 66 | 50.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 1045 | 492 | 488 | 65 | 47.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 931 | 382 | 506 | 43 | 41.0% |
| Döry Defense | 906 | 421 | 433 | 52 | 46.5% |
| Modern | 882 | 396 | 444 | 42 | 44.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 779 | 350 | 397 | 32 | 44.9% |
| Modern Defense | 701 | 320 | 344 | 37 | 45.6% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 614 | 288 | 287 | 39 | 46.9% |
| Czech Defense | 612 | 274 | 304 | 34 | 44.8% |
| French Defense | 552 | 247 | 278 | 27 | 44.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 159 | 86 | 69 | 4 | 54.1% |
| French Defense | 81 | 39 | 40 | 2 | 48.1% |
| Döry Defense | 68 | 30 | 33 | 5 | 44.1% |
| Czech Defense | 65 | 40 | 25 | 0 | 61.5% |
| Australian Defense | 53 | 22 | 28 | 3 | 41.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 51 | 28 | 18 | 5 | 54.9% |
| Modern Defense | 49 | 29 | 20 | 0 | 59.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 42 | 20 | 21 | 1 | 47.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 40 | 18 | 21 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 39 | 21 | 16 | 2 | 53.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: St. Petersburg Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 3 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |