Biography
Milos Milosevic is a chess International Master whose fighting spirit fits neatly into a compact, binge-worthy game. Known for practical, tenacious defense and sharp endgames, he treats every position as a puzzle to be solved with calm humor and relentless calculation. In the world of rapid-fire chess, Milos is a stalwart presence who proves that patience and bite can share the same move order.
Career Highlights
- FIDE International Master (IM) title holder.
- Preferred time control appears to be Rapid, with strong showings in blitz and rapid events.
- Peak blitz performance reached impressive levels, illustrating his tactical sharpness and resilience.
- Vast and versatile opening repertoire, including Nimzo-Larsen Attack, Amar Gambit, and Colle System variations.
For a quick glimpse of his rapid performance trajectory, see
.Playing Style and Openings
Milosevic thrives in complex, dynamic games where the position stays lively. His endgame technique is a particular strength, often turning small advantages into durable results. His repertoire features:
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack
- Amar Gambit
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation
- Colle System and related flexible setups
These choices reflect a pragmatic, fight-to-the-last-piece approach that fans enjoy. Learn more about his journey in Milos Milosevic’s profile milosmilosevic.
Profile
Read Milos Milosevic's full profile and career notes here: milosmilosevic.
Overview
Milos Milosevic has shown solid talking points in rapid games with a wide opening repertoire and active piece play. You’ve had crisp wins from dynamic positions and some tough losses where accuracy and endgame conversion were the deciding factors. The focus now is on converting advantages more consistently and tightening decision-making in the middlegame and endgame.
Strengths demonstrated
- Engaging, tactical play: You create practical problems for your opponent by coordinating pieces actively and seeking sharp, dynamic chances when the position allows.
- Opening versatility: You handle a broad set of defenses with confidence, including Scandinavian-style structures and aggressive center play, which gives you varied practical chances against different opponents.
- Energy in the middlegame: Your pieces often harmonize well when you press the center and open lines, generating pressure on f- and c- files and on key squares around the king.
Key areas to improve
- Endgame conversion: After obtaining an advantage, focus on converting it into a win rather than easing into exchanges that reduce pressure. Practice common endgames you encounter in your openings, especially rook endings and queen endings with pawns on opposite wings.
- Time management: In rapid games, allocate time for critical turning points and avoid long, uncertain sequences late in the game. Build in a short pause to re-check key tactics before committing to a plan.
- Plan clarity after the opening: Identify a concrete middlegame plan early—such as a specific pawn break or targeted piece maneuver—and stick to it instead of trading pieces too quickly or drifting into passive lines.
- Selection pressure: When you have an initiative, look for forcing moves or clear tactical motifs to maintain momentum and prevent the opponent from equalizing comfortably.
Opening and middlegame recommendations
Your opening performance shows strength in several lines, notably the Scandinavian Defense and the Center Game variants, with strong win rates. Consider consolidating 1-2 openings as your main toolkit to increase consistency, while keeping a couple of surprise options for opponents who are well prepared.
- Scandinavian Defense: Maintain your active approach but study typical middle game plans that arise after the first deviations. Focus on key knight and bishop placements that keep you ahead in development.
- Center Game variants: Build on early central control and look for the right moment to push the central pawn breaks that unlock lines for your rooks and queen.
- French Defense lines you've used: Learn the critical pawn breaks and typical piece routes to avoid getting into passive endgames; practice common tactical motifs that arise in these structures.
Practice plan for the next two weeks
- Focus on two openings: Scandinavian Defense and Center Game. Study 3-4 model games for each and annotate the point where you gained or could have gained the advantage.
- Endgame drills: Practice rook endings and simple queen + rook endings from positions that commonly occur in your games.
- Tactical training: 20-30 minutes daily of puzzles that emphasize attacking patterns, discovered attacks, and typical motifs seen in your middlegame plans.
- Time management work: Play a set of 20+2 rapid games with a rule to pause for a quick tactical check at move 15 or 20, then continue to the end.
Tracking progress
Maintain a simple log of each rapid game with notes on what you did well and where you could improve, especially focusing on conversion in the middlegame and the resulting endgame. After two weeks, review the entries to adjust your study plan.
Want to review a specific game or open a personalized study plan? milosmilosevic
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| playfaster260 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| benchess18 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| iuriipleskach | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| majorian_i | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| fernandes_25 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| notablebasefound | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| comeverduras | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| filipereti | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| eran148 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Orlando Husbands | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| samael_mr | 32W / 45L / 4D | View Games |
| davidovac | 35W / 31L / 9D | View Games |
| kapablanka05 | 43W / 27L / 4D | View Games |
| LudiRadovan | 19W / 33L / 9D | View Games |
| wintercurse96 | 21W / 19L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2344 | 2474 | 2400 | |
| 2024 | 2437 | 2323 | 2400 | |
| 2023 | 2641 | 2425 | 2400 | 1772 |
| 2022 | 2599 | 2653 | 2279 | 1757 |
| 2021 | 2530 | 2403 | 2110 | |
| 2020 | 2222 | 2387 | 2109 | 1534 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 306W / 238L / 37D | 266W / 275L / 31D | 72.0 |
| 2024 | 188W / 196L / 21D | 179W / 195L / 31D | 76.0 |
| 2023 | 359W / 322L / 58D | 310W / 384L / 41D | 77.5 |
| 2022 | 622W / 600L / 106D | 634W / 619L / 83D | 79.4 |
| 2021 | 308W / 279L / 32D | 283W / 294L / 43D | 76.3 |
| 2020 | 164W / 150L / 21D | 148W / 166L / 22D | 64.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 209 | 107 | 90 | 12 | 51.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 201 | 83 | 100 | 18 | 41.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 196 | 105 | 80 | 11 | 53.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 149 | 67 | 71 | 11 | 45.0% |
| Modern | 136 | 59 | 74 | 3 | 43.4% |
| Czech Defense | 132 | 61 | 59 | 12 | 46.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 125 | 63 | 58 | 4 | 50.4% |
| Australian Defense | 123 | 58 | 56 | 9 | 47.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 118 | 59 | 50 | 9 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 118 | 56 | 52 | 10 | 47.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 291 | 153 | 118 | 20 | 52.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 163 | 86 | 65 | 12 | 52.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 132 | 71 | 57 | 4 | 53.8% |
| Australian Defense | 128 | 52 | 72 | 4 | 40.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 89 | 42 | 45 | 2 | 47.2% |
| Modern | 88 | 45 | 36 | 7 | 51.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 74 | 30 | 40 | 4 | 40.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 66 | 34 | 29 | 3 | 51.5% |
| Czech Defense | 66 | 29 | 33 | 4 | 43.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 60 | 32 | 27 | 1 | 53.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slav Defense: Alekhine Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game: Spanish Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 1 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |